@article{Hassler2006, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {A Fala : normalizaci{\´o}n tard{\´i}a e identidad cultural}, year = {2006}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2011, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Acknowlegements}, isbn = {978-90-272-4606-6}, year = {2011}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2021, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Adverbal expression of aspectuality and interaction with perfective and imperfective verbs}, series = {Russian Grammar: System - Usus - Variation/Русская грамматика: Cистема - узус - варьирование}, journal = {Russian Grammar: System - Usus - Variation/Русская грамматика: Cистема - узус - варьирование}, publisher = {Lang}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-631-87748-7}, pages = {219 -- 234}, year = {2021}, abstract = {This paper intends to explore the interaction between aspect and lexical means, in this case temporal adverbials, in the bounding of representations of situations. First, the theoretical basis is outlined, followed by the results of a corpus analysis of coccurrences with adverbs that limit situations. The term situation encompasses all representable processes, states, events, or actions. Finally, some theoretical conclusions are drawn concerning the cognitive category of bounding, using the example of aspectuality. The imperfective verb forms maintain their aspectuality in delimiting connections with adverbs, resulting in a complex, multi-dimensional aspectuality. In nongrammaticalized forms, such as lexical markers, the speaker is free to make a temporal localization or an aspectual perspective. Lexical expressions can make temporal and aspect markings even more precisely and clearly than tenses. They can also limit or extend situations and thus express aspect. Aspectuality thus presents itself as a compositional category, in which external bounding and the internal representation of a course of action or development can interact.}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2007, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Analogy : the history of a concept and a term from the 17th to the 19th century}, isbn = {978-90-272-4603-5}, year = {2007}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2001, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Crosslinguistic and diachronic remarks on the grammaticalization of aspect in Romance languages : location and motion verbs}, year = {2001}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler1999, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Diversity of human languages and universals of thougth : an eigteenth-century debate in the Berlin Academy}, isbn = {90-272-4583-5}, year = {1999}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2010, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Epistemic modality and evidentiality and their determination on a deictic basis}, isbn = {978-3-11-023433-6}, year = {2010}, abstract = {It has often been pointed out that there is some overlap between epistemic modality and evidentiality (Chafe \& Nichols 1986, Cornillie 2007, De Haan 1999, Dendale \& Tasmowski 2001, Plungian 2001, Squartini 2004). In this paper I would like to offer several reflections about the necessity of drawing a boundary between modality and evidentiality. Starting from the typological category of evidentiality - extended here for use in pragmatic studies - I will then explore demarcation problems in Romance languages, which lack grammaticalized forms for expressing evidentiality. The underlying premise of this paper is that evidentiality as marker of the origin of the speaker's knowledge stands in relation to the speaker's pragmatic stance. Because the perspective of the speaker is thus incorporated into the utterance, it seems appropriate to analyse the applicability of the deictic category. Finally, under the aspect of deixis, I shall attempt a demarcation between evidentiality and modality.}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2010, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Epistemic modality and evidentiality and their determination on a deictic basis : the case of Romance languages}, isbn = {978-3-11-022396-5}, year = {2010}, abstract = {In recent years the category of evidentiality has come into use also for the description of Romance languages. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. In the following we will first describe the theoretical framework in which we use the category of evidentiality for the description of Romance languages. A key question to be elucidated here will be the determination of evidentiality as a deictic phenomenon. This will also be the basis for discussing the distinction between evidentiality and epistemic modality.}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2003, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Epistemic modality revisited: evidential functions of lexical and grammatical forms in Romance languages}, isbn = {80-8673221-5}, year = {2003}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2018, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Evidential and epistemic sentence adverbs in Romance languages}, series = {Linguistik online}, volume = {92}, journal = {Linguistik online}, number = {5}, issn = {1615-3014}, doi = {10.13092/lo.92.4506}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-421822}, pages = {82 -- 98}, year = {2018}, abstract = {In this paper evidential and modal adverbs will be studied, such as French apparemment, {\´e}videmment, visiblement, Italian apparentemente, evidentemente, ovviamente, and Spanish aparentemente, evidentemente and visiblemente. The development of their signification will be discussed, including German adverbs like offensichtlich. In these means of expression, the functional-semantic categories evidentiality and epistemic modality seem to overlap: on the one hand, they are used if the state of affairs talked about cannot be verified, that is, if there is still a moment of insecurity concerning the transmitted information. Then adverbials with a special structure (preposition + article + nominal form of a verb) will be analysed, and we will examine if they behave in the same way.}, language = {en} }