@book{HoltmannHoltmannGoerletal.2004,
  author    = {Holtmann, Dieter and Holtmann, Elisabeth and G{\"o}rl, Tilo and Goltz, Elke and Fischer, Ulrike and Janeczka, Ines and Jacobi, Lena and Otto, Christian and Klauß, Christian and Hoffmann, Juliane and Tinsner, Karen and Patzwald, Claudia and Buchheister, Claudia and Bsdok, Ursula and Christ, Mirja and Elsner, Anne and Hagenm{\"u}ller, Jan-Peter and Kellner, Andreas},
  title     = {Gewalt und Fremdenfeindlichkeit : Erkl{\"a}rungsfaktoren sowie Handlungsempfehlungen zu den kriminalpr{\"a}ventiven und zivilgesellschaftlichen Potentialen},
  publisher = {Landespr{\"a}ventionsrat Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  pages     = {76 S.},
  year      = {2004},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HenrichsElsnerElsneretal.2012,
  author    = {Henrichs, Ivanina and Elsner, Claudia and Elsner, Birgit and Gredeback, Gustaf},
  title     = {Goal salience affects infants' goal-directed gaze shifts},
  series = {Frontiers in psychology},
  volume    = {3},
  journal   = {Frontiers in psychology},
  publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00391},
  pages     = {7},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Around their first year of life, infants are able to anticipate the goal of others' ongoing actions. For instance, 12-month-olds anticipate the goal of everyday feeding actions and manual actions such as reaching and grasping. However, little is known whether the salience of the goal influences infants' online assessment of others' actions. The aim of the current eye-tracking study was to elucidate infants' ability to anticipate reaching actions depending on the visual salience of the goal object. In Experiment 1, 12-month-old infants' goal-directed gaze shifts were recorded as they observed a hand reaching for and grasping either a large (high-salience condition) or a small (low-salience condition) goal object. Infants exhibited predictive gaze shifts significantly earlier when the observed hand reached for the large goal object compared to when it reached for the small goal object. In addition, findings revealed rapid learning over the course of trials in the high-salience condition and no learning in the low-salience condition. Experiment 2 demonstrated that the results could not be simply attributed to the different grip aperture of the hand used when reaching for small and large objects. Together, our data indicate that by the end of their first year of life, infants rely on information about the goal salience to make inferences about the action goal.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HenrichsElsnerElsneretal.2014,
  author    = {Henrichs, Ivanina and Elsner, Claudia and Elsner, Birgit and Wilkinson, Nick and Gredeback, Gustaf},
  title     = {Goal certainty modulates infants' goal-directed gaze shifts},
  series = {Developmental psychology},
  volume    = {50},
  journal   = {Developmental psychology},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {American Psychological Association},
  address   = {Washington},
  issn      = {0012-1649},
  doi       = {10.1037/a0032664},
  pages     = {100 -- 107},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {We investigated whether 12-month-old infants rely on information about the certainty of goal selection in order to predict observed reaching actions. Infants' goal-directed gaze shifts were recorded as they observed action sequences in a multiple-goals design. We found that 12-month-old infants exhibited gaze shifts significantly earlier when the observed hand reached for the same goal object in all trials (frequent condition) compared with when the observed hand reached for different goal objects across trials (nonfrequent condition). Infants in the frequent condition were significantly more accurate at predicting the action goal than infants in the nonfrequent condition. In addition, findings revealed rapid learning in the case of certainty and no learning in the case of uncertainty of goal selection over the course of trials. Together, our data indicate that by the end of their first year of life, infants rely on information about the certainty of goal selection to make inferences about others' action goals.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{AdamReitenbachPapenmeieretal.2016,
  author    = {Adam, Maurits and Reitenbach, Ivanina and Papenmeier, Frank and Gredeb{\"a}ck, Gustaf and Elsner, Claudia and Elsner, Birgit},
  title     = {actions, but not for mechanical claws},
  series = {Meteoritics \& planetary science : journal of the Meteoritical Society},
  volume    = {44},
  journal   = {Meteoritics \& planetary science : journal of the Meteoritical Society},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {0163-6383},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.05.001},
  pages     = {29 -- 37},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Previous research indicates that infants' prediction of the goals of observed actions is influenced by own experience with the type of agent performing the action (i.e., human hand vs. non-human agent) as well as by action-relevant features of goal objects (e.g., object size). The present study investigated the combined effects of these factors on 12-month-olds' action prediction. Infants' (N = 49) goal-directed gaze shifts were recorded as they observed 14 trials in which either a human hand or a mechanical claw reached for a small goal area (low-saliency goal) or a large goal area (high-saliency goal). Only infants who had observed the human hand reaching for a high-saliency goal fixated the goal object ahead of time, and they rapidly learned to predict the action goal across trials. By contrast, infants in all other conditions did not track the observed action in a predictive manner, and their gaze shifts to the action goal did not change systematically across trials. Thus, high-saliency goals seem to boost infants' predictive gaze shifts during the observation of human manual actions, but not of actions performed by a mechanical device. This supports the assumption that infants' action predictions are based on interactive effects of action-relevant object features (e.g., size) and own action experience.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{ZimmermannHornConradScholzetal.2020,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Matthias and Horn-Conrad, Antje and Scholz, Jana and Elsner, Birgit and Schubarth, Wilfried and Engel, Silke and Blaum, Niels and R{\"o}ßling, Claudia and Mikulla, Stefanie},
  title     = {Portal - Spezial 2020: Corona},
  number    = {Spezial 2020},
  organization    = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam, Referat f{\"u}r Presse- und {\"O}ffentlichkeitsarbeit},
  issn      = {1618-6893},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-48143},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-481430},
  pages     = {58},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Corona. Schon mal geh{\"o}rt? Noch Weihnachten 2019 h{\"a}tten viele ahnungslos geantwortet: „N{\"o}." Besser Informierte h{\"a}tten zur{\"u}ckgefragt: „Meinst du die Korona - den Hof um die Sonne?" Und ganz Schlaue h{\"a}tten gesagt: „Klar, trink ich gern." Doch sp{\"a}testens seit Februar beherrscht das Virus die Nachrichten, seit M{\"a}rz auch unser Leben. Nach und nach mussten wir alle lernen, uns (wieder) richtig die H{\"a}nde zu waschen und die „Niesetikette" zu befolgen, Abstand zu halten, zu Hause zu arbeiten oder zu lernen, Masken zu tragen oder gar zu n{\"a}hen - und {\"u}berhaupt: uns mit dem Ausnahmezustand, der zum Dauerzustand zu werden droht, zu arrangieren. Aber wie macht das eine ganze Universit{\"a}t - mit 21.000 Studierenden, mehr als 4.500 Besch{\"a}ftigten, Tausenden Kursen, Praktika, Pr{\"u}fungen und Forschungsprojekten? Wie h{\"a}lt man einen Tanker an - in voller Fahrt - und r{\"u}stet ihn um f{\"u}r einen pandemiesicheren Betrieb? Die zur{\"u}ckliegenden Wochen haben gezeigt: Es geht. Inzwischen l{\"a}uft mit dem Sommersemester 2020 das erste Online-Semester der Hochschulgeschichte. Auch das h{\"a}tte Ende 2019 niemand f{\"u}r m{\"o}glich gehalten, schon gar nicht so bald. Das Referat f{\"u}r Presse- und {\"O}ffentlichkeitsarbeit musste wie alle Unibereiche lernen, mit den ungew{\"o}hnlichen Umst{\"a}nden umzugehen, die mal bedrohlich, mal l{\"a}stig, mal erm{\"u}dend und mal eben einfach nur umst{\"a}ndlich wirkten. Wir haben uns bem{\"u}ht, so gut es ging, zu informieren - dar{\"u}ber was sich tat, was getan werden musste und konnte. Und was kommt. Doch wir wollten noch mehr wissen: Was sagen die Potsdamer Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler zur Corona- Pandemie, ihren Auswirkungen und Folgen, aber auch dazu, was sich dagegen tun l{\"a}sst? Wie genau funktioniert eine Universit{\"a}t unter den besonderen Umst{\"a}nden? Wie wird gearbeitet, studiert, geforscht? Wie verlagert man ein ganzes Semester in den Online-Betrieb? Auf der Suche nach Antworten auf diese und viele weitere Fragen ist eine Vielzahl von Texten entstanden, die wir nach und nach auf der Webseite der UP ver{\"o}ffentlicht haben als „Beitr{\"a}ge aus der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam zur Corona-Pandemie".* Eine gek{\"u}rzte Auswahl dieser Texte haben wir f{\"u}r diese „Portal Spezial" zusammengestellt. Nicht, weil wir {\"u}ber nichts anderes als den Corona-Virus mehr reden wollen, sondern weil wir dokumentieren wollen, dass die Universit{\"a}t Potsdam durch die Pandemie keineswegs in einen Dornr{\"o}schenschlaf versetzt wurde. Vielmehr entstanden durch das Engagement vieler Forschender, Studierender und Besch{\"a}ftigter zahlreiche Initiativen, Ideen, Projekte, Strukturen und Neuerungen, die zeigen: Die Universit{\"a}t Potsdam l{\"a}sst sich nicht unterkriegen! Deshalb hoffen wir, dass die Lekt{\"u}re des Heftes Ihnen trotz der weiterhin herausfordernden Umst{\"a}nde Freude und Mut macht. (Die Texte entstanden alle im M{\"a}rz/April 2020, als viele Entwicklungen noch am Anfang standen und ihr Verlauf nicht absehbar war. Wir haben sie dennoch unver{\"a}ndert aufgenommen, um diese Phase und die Reaktion der Wissenschaft darauf zu dokumentieren.)},
  language  = {de}
}