@misc{FrenkenAlacidBergeretal.2017, author = {Frenken, Thijs and Alacid, Elisabet and Berger, Stella A. and Bourne, Elizabeth Charlotte and Gerphagnon, Melanie and Großart, Hans-Peter and Gsell, Alena S. and Ibelings, Bas W. and Kagami, Maiko and Kupper, Frithjof C. and Letcher, Peter M. and Loyau, Adeline and Miki, Takeshi and Nejstgaard, Jens C. and Rasconi, Serena and Rene, Albert and Rohrlack, Thomas and Rojas-Jimenez, Keilor and Schmeller, Dirk S. and Scholz, Bettina and Seto, Kensuke and Sime-Ngando, Telesphore and Sukenik, Assaf and Van de Waal, Dedmer B. and Van den Wyngaert, Silke and Van Donk, Ellen and Wolinska, Justyna and Wurzbacher, Christian and Agha, Ramsy}, title = {Integrating chytrid fungal parasites into plankton ecology: research gaps and needs}, series = {Environmental microbiology}, volume = {19}, journal = {Environmental microbiology}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {1462-2912}, doi = {10.1111/1462-2920.13827}, pages = {3802 -- 3822}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Chytridiomycota, often referred to as chytrids, can be virulent parasites with the potential to inflict mass mortalities on hosts, causing e.g. changes in phytoplankton size distributions and succession, and the delay or suppression of bloom events. Molecular environmental surveys have revealed an unexpectedly large diversity of chytrids across a wide range of aquatic ecosystems worldwide. As a result, scientific interest towards fungal parasites of phytoplankton has been gaining momentum in the past few years. Yet, we still know little about the ecology of chytrids, their life cycles, phylogeny, host specificity and range. Information on the contribution of chytrids to trophic interactions, as well as co-evolutionary feedbacks of fungal parasitism on host populations is also limited. This paper synthesizes ideas stressing the multifaceted biological relevance of phytoplankton chytridiomycosis, resulting from discussions among an international team of chytrid researchers. It presents our view on the most pressing research needs for promoting the integration of chytrid fungi into aquatic ecology.}, language = {en} } @misc{VanDonkIanoraVos2011, author = {Van Donk, Ellen and Ianora, Adrianna and Vos, Matthijs}, title = {Induced defences in marine and freshwater phytoplankton}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {881}, issn = {1866-8372}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-43513}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-435130}, pages = {19}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Many organisms have developed defences to avoid predation by species at higher trophic levels. The capability of primary producers to defend themselves against herbivores affects their own survival, can modulate the strength of trophic cascades and changes rates of competitive exclusion in aquatic communities. Algal species are highly flexible in their morphology, growth form, biochemical composition and production of toxic and deterrent compounds. Several of these variable traits in phytoplankton have been interpreted as defence mechanisms against grazing. Zooplankton feed with differing success on various phytoplankton species, depending primarily on size, shape, cell wall structure and the production of toxins and deterrents. Chemical cues associated with (i) mechanical damage, (ii) herbivore presence and (iii) grazing are the main factors triggering induced defences in both marine and freshwater phytoplankton, but most studies have failed to disentangle the exact mechanism(s) governing defence induction in any particular species. Induced defences in phytoplankton include changes in morphology (e.g. the formation of spines, colonies and thicker cell walls), biochemistry (such as production of toxins, repellents) and in life history characteristics (formation of cysts, reduced recruitment rate). Our categorization of inducible defences in terms of the responsible induction mechanism provides guidance for future work, as hardly any of the available studies on marine or freshwater plankton have performed all the treatments that are required to pinpoint the actual cue(s) for induction. We discuss the ecology of inducible defences in marine and freshwater phytoplankton with a special focus on the mechanisms of induction, the types of defences, their costs and benefits, and their consequences at the community level.}, language = {en} } @misc{VanDonkIanoraVos2011, author = {Van Donk, Ellen and Ianora, Adrianna and Vos, Matthijs}, title = {Induced defences in marine and freshwater phytoplankton a review}, series = {Hydrobiologia : acta hydrobiologica, hydrographica, limnologica et protistologica}, volume = {668}, journal = {Hydrobiologia : acta hydrobiologica, hydrographica, limnologica et protistologica}, number = {1}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Dordrecht}, issn = {0018-8158}, doi = {10.1007/s10750-010-0395-4}, pages = {3 -- 19}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Many organisms have developed defences to avoid predation by species at higher trophic levels. The capability of primary producers to defend themselves against herbivores affects their own survival, can modulate the strength of trophic cascades and changes rates of competitive exclusion in aquatic communities. Algal species are highly flexible in their morphology, growth form, biochemical composition and production of toxic and deterrent compounds. Several of these variable traits in phytoplankton have been interpreted as defence mechanisms against grazing. Zooplankton feed with differing success on various phytoplankton species, depending primarily on size, shape, cell wall structure and the production of toxins and deterrents. Chemical cues associated with (i) mechanical damage, (ii) herbivore presence and (iii) grazing are the main factors triggering induced defences in both marine and freshwater phytoplankton, but most studies have failed to disentangle the exact mechanism(s) governing defence induction in any particular species. Induced defences in phytoplankton include changes in morphology (e.g. the formation of spines, colonies and thicker cell walls), biochemistry (such as production of toxins, repellents) and in life history characteristics (formation of cysts, reduced recruitment rate). Our categorization of inducible defences in terms of the responsible induction mechanism provides guidance for future work, as hardly any of the available studies on marine or freshwater plankton have performed all the treatments that are required to pinpoint the actual cue(s) for induction. We discuss the ecology of inducible defences in marine and freshwater phytoplankton with a special focus on the mechanisms of induction, the types of defences, their costs and benefits, and their consequences at the community level.}, language = {en} } @misc{SommerAdrianDomisetal.2012, author = {Sommer, Ulrich and Adrian, Rita and Domis, Lisette Nicole de Senerpont and Elser, James J. and Gaedke, Ursula and Ibelings, Bas and Jeppesen, Erik and Lurling, Miquel and Molinero, Juan Carlos and Mooij, Wolf M. and van Donk, Ellen and Winder, Monika}, title = {Beyond the Plankton Ecology Group (PEG) Model mechanisms driving plankton succession}, series = {Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics}, volume = {43}, journal = {Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics}, number = {2-4}, editor = {Futuyma, DJ}, publisher = {Annual Reviews}, address = {Palo Alto}, isbn = {978-0-8243-1443-9}, issn = {1543-592X}, doi = {10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160251}, pages = {429 -- 448}, year = {2012}, abstract = {The seasonal succession of plankton is an annually repeated process of community assembly during which all major external factors and internal interactions shaping communities can be studied. A quarter of a century ago, the state of this understanding was described by the verbal plankton ecology group (PEG) model. It emphasized the role of physical factors, grazing and nutrient limitation for phytoplankton, and the role of food limitation and fish predation for zooplankton. Although originally targeted at lake ecosystems, it was also adopted by marine plankton ecologists. Since then, a suite of ecological interactions previously underestimated in importance have become research foci: overwintering of key organisms, the microbial food web, parasitism, and food quality as a limiting factor and an extended role of higher order predators. A review of the impact of these novel interactions on plankton seasonal succession reveals limited effects on gross seasonal biomass patterns, but strong effects on species replacements.}, language = {en} }