@article{LaiMischkeMadsen2014,
  author    = {Lai, ZhongPing and Mischke, Steffen and Madsen, David},
  title     = {Paleoenvironmental implications of new OSL dates on the formation of the "Shell Bar" in the Qaidam Basin, northeastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau},
  series = {Journal of paleolimnolog},
  volume    = {51},
  journal   = {Journal of paleolimnolog},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Dordrecht},
  issn      = {0921-2728},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10933-013-9710-1},
  pages     = {197 -- 210},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {A geological feature in the Qaidam Basin known as the "Shell Bar" contains millions of freshwater clam shells buried in situ. Since the 1980s, this feature in the now hyper-arid basin has been interpreted to be lake deposits that provide evidence for a warmer and more humid climate than present during late marine isotope stage 3 (MIS 3). Global climate during late MIS 3 and the last glacial maximum, however, was cold and dry, with much lower sea levels. We re-investigated the feature geomorphologically and sedimentologically, and employed optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating to verify the chronology of the sediments. We interpret the Shell Bar to be a remnant of a river channel formed by a stream that ran across an exposed lake bed during a regressive lake phase. Deflation of the surrounding older, fine-grained lacustrine deposits has left the fluvial channel sediments topographically inverted, indicating the erosive nature of the landscape. Luminescence ages place the formation of the Shell Bar in MIS 5 (similar to 113-99 ka), much older than previous radiocarbon ages of < 40 ka BP, but place the paleoclimatic inferences more in accord with other regional and global climate proxy records. We present a brief review of the age differences derived from C-14 and OSL dating of some critical sections that were thought to represent a warmer and more humid climate than present during late MIS 3. We attribute the differences to underestimation of C-14 ages. We suggest that C-14 ages older than similar to 25 ka BP may require re-investigation, especially dates on samples from arid regions.},
  language  = {en}
}
@unpublished{MischkeMadsenZhangetal.2015,
  author    = {Mischke, Steffen and Madsen, David and Zhang, Chengjun and Lai, Zhongping},
  title     = {Reply to comment by Zhang (2014): The Shell Bar in the Qaidam Basin: fluvial or lake deposit, and OSL versus C-14 age data},
  series = {Journal of paleolimnolog},
  volume    = {53},
  journal   = {Journal of paleolimnolog},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Dordrecht},
  issn      = {0921-2728},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10933-014-9817-z},
  pages     = {335 -- 344},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{McHuronAdamczakArnouldetal.2022,
  author    = {McHuron, Elizabeth A. and Adamczak, Stephanie and Arnould, John P. Y. and Ashe, Erin and Booth, Cormac and Bowen, W. Don and Christiansen, Fredrik and Chudzinska, Magda and Costa, Daniel P. and Fahlman, Andreas and Farmer, Nicholas A. and Fortune, Sarah M. E. and Gallagher, Cara A. and Keen, Kelly A. and Madsen, Peter T. and McMahon, Clive R. and Nabe-Nielsen, Jacob and Noren, Dawn P. and Noren, Shawn R. and Pirotta, Enrico and Rosen, David A. S. and Speakman, Cassie N. and Villegas-Amtmann, Stella and Williams, Rob},
  title     = {Key questions in marine mammal bioenergetics},
  series = {Conservation physiology},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Conservation physiology},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {2051-1434},
  doi       = {10.1093/conphys/coac055},
  pages     = {17},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Bioenergetic approaches are increasingly used to understand how marine mammal populations could be affected by a changing and disturbed aquatic environment. There remain considerable gaps in our knowledge of marine mammal bioenergetics, which hinder the application of bioenergetic studies to inform policy decisions. We conducted a priority-setting exercise to identify high-priority unanswered questions in marine mammal bioenergetics, with an emphasis on questions relevant to conservation and management. Electronic communication and a virtual workshop were used to solicit and collate potential research questions from the marine mammal bioenergetic community. From a final list of 39 questions, 11 were identified as 'key'questions because they received votes from at least 50\% of survey participants. Key questions included those related to energy intake (prey landscapes, exposure to human activities) and expenditure (field metabolic rate, exposure to human activities, lactation, time-activity budgets), energy allocation priorities, metrics of body condition and relationships with survival and reproductive success and extrapolation of data from one species to another. Existing tools to address key questions include labelled water, animal-borne sensors, mark-resight data from long-term research programs, environmental DNA and unmanned vehicles. Further validation of existing approaches and development of new methodologies are needed to comprehensively address some key questions, particularly for cetaceans. The identification of these key questions can provide a guiding framework to set research priorities, which ultimately may yield more accurate information to inform policies and better conserve marine mammal populations.},
  language  = {en}
}