@article{ChipmanFerrierBrenaetal.2014,
  author    = {Chipman, Ariel D. and Ferrier, David E. K. and Brena, Carlo and Qu, Jiaxin and Hughes, Daniel S. T. and Schroeder, Reinhard and Torres-Oliva, Montserrat and Znassi, Nadia and Jiang, Huaiyang and Almeida, Francisca C. and Alonso, Claudio R. and Apostolou, Zivkos and Aqrawi, Peshtewani and Arthur, Wallace and Barna, Jennifer C. J. and Blankenburg, Kerstin P. and Brites, Daniela and Capella-Gutierrez, Salvador and Coyle, Marcus and Dearden, Peter K. and Du Pasquier, Louis and Duncan, Elizabeth J. and Ebert, Dieter and Eibner, Cornelius and Erikson, Galina and Evans, Peter D. and Extavour, Cassandra G. and Francisco, Liezl and Gabaldon, Toni and Gillis, William J. and Goodwin-Horn, Elizabeth A. and Green, Jack E. and Griffiths-Jones, Sam and Grimmelikhuijzen, Cornelis J. P. and Gubbala, Sai and Guigo, Roderic and Han, Yi and Hauser, Frank and Havlak, Paul and Hayden, Luke and Helbing, Sophie and Holder, Michael and Hui, Jerome H. L. and Hunn, Julia P. and Hunnekuhl, Vera S. and Jackson, LaRonda and Javaid, Mehwish and Jhangiani, Shalini N. and Jiggins, Francis M. and Jones, Tamsin E. and Kaiser, Tobias S. and Kalra, Divya and Kenny, Nathan J. and Korchina, Viktoriya and Kovar, Christie L. and Kraus, F. Bernhard and Lapraz, Francois and Lee, Sandra L. and Lv, Jie and Mandapat, Christigale and Manning, Gerard and Mariotti, Marco and Mata, Robert and Mathew, Tittu and Neumann, Tobias and Newsham, Irene and Ngo, Dinh N. and Ninova, Maria and Okwuonu, Geoffrey and Ongeri, Fiona and Palmer, William J. and Patil, Shobha and Patraquim, Pedro and Pham, Christopher and Pu, Ling-Ling and Putman, Nicholas H. and Rabouille, Catherine and Ramos, Olivia Mendivil and Rhodes, Adelaide C. and Robertson, Helen E. and Robertson, Hugh M. and Ronshaugen, Matthew and Rozas, Julio and Saada, Nehad and Sanchez-Gracia, Alejandro and Scherer, Steven E. and Schurko, Andrew M. and Siggens, Kenneth W. and Simmons, DeNard and Stief, Anna and Stolle, Eckart and Telford, Maximilian J. and Tessmar-Raible, Kristin and Thornton, Rebecca and van der Zee, Maurijn and von Haeseler, Arndt and Williams, James M. and Willis, Judith H. and Wu, Yuanqing and Zou, Xiaoyan and Lawson, Daniel and Muzny, Donna M. and Worley, Kim C. and Gibbs, Richard A. and Akam, Michael and Richards, Stephen},
  title     = {The first myriapod genome sequence reveals conservative arthropod gene content and genome organisation in the centipede Strigamia maritima},
  series = {PLoS biology},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {PLoS biology},
  number    = {11},
  publisher = {PLoS},
  address   = {San Fransisco},
  issn      = {1545-7885},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pbio.1002005},
  pages     = {24},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Myriapods (e. g., centipedes and millipedes) display a simple homonomous body plan relative to other arthropods. All members of the class are terrestrial, but they attained terrestriality independently of insects. Myriapoda is the only arthropod class not represented by a sequenced genome. We present an analysis of the genome of the centipede Strigamia maritima. It retains a compact genome that has undergone less gene loss and shuffling than previously sequenced arthropods, and many orthologues of genes conserved from the bilaterian ancestor that have been lost in insects. Our analysis locates many genes in conserved macro-synteny contexts, and many small-scale examples of gene clustering. We describe several examples where S. maritima shows different solutions from insects to similar problems. The insect olfactory receptor gene family is absent from S. maritima, and olfaction in air is likely effected by expansion of other receptor gene families. For some genes S. maritima has evolved paralogues to generate coding sequence diversity, where insects use alternate splicing. This is most striking for the Dscam gene, which in Drosophila generates more than 100,000 alternate splice forms, but in S. maritima is encoded by over 100 paralogues. We see an intriguing linkage between the absence of any known photosensory proteins in a blind organism and the additional absence of canonical circadian clock genes. The phylogenetic position of myriapods allows us to identify where in arthropod phylogeny several particular molecular mechanisms and traits emerged. For example, we conclude that juvenile hormone signalling evolved with the emergence of the exoskeleton in the arthropods and that RR-1 containing cuticle proteins evolved in the lineage leading to Mandibulata. We also identify when various gene expansions and losses occurred. The genome of S. maritima offers us a unique glimpse into the ancestral arthropod genome, while also displaying many adaptations to its specific life history.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{NeumannBrandtWardenbergBrodowskyetal.2008,
  author    = {Neumann, Martin and Brandt-Wardenberg, Henriette and Brodowsky, Kristin and Ebert, Daniel and Hose, Susanne and Junge, Katrin and Kappler, Anna and Karges, Melanie and Lehnert, Annette and Richter, Olivia and Schirrmeister, Sebastian and Solich, Raphaela and Thaele, Liisa and Trenkner, Christina and Tsch{\"o}pel, Sebastian and Unger, Katharina and Winkler, Anja and Zimmermann, Steven and Kirschke, Andreas and Ladusch, Manfred},
  title     = {Sorben (Wenden) - Eine Brandenburger Minderheit und ihre Thematisierung im Unterricht : Teil III: Krabat - Aspekte einer sorbischen Sage},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-27315},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {Die vorliegende Publikation f{\"a}llt ein wenig aus dem Rahmen der Reihe „Sorben (Wenden) - Eine Brandenburger Minderheit und ihre Thematisierung im Unterricht". Im Gegensatz zu den anderen Teilen widmet sie sich nur einem Gegenstand - dem Stoff der Krabat-Sagen. Damit richtet sie sich haupts{\"a}chlich an Lehrkr{\"a}fte im Fach Deutsch, wobei auch fach{\"u}bergreifende und F{\"a}cher verbindende Aspekte ber{\"u}cksichtigt werden. Die Krabat-Sage z{\"a}hlt vor allem in der Bearbeitung von Preußler zu den bekanntesten sorbischen Stoffen. Diese sorbischen Wurzeln werden allerdings nur selten thematisiert. Daher sind viele der vorliegenden Betrachtungen zu ausgew{\"a}hlten Aspekten auch als Anregungen zu verstehen, unter welchen Gesichtspunkten Krabat behandelt oder gar neu interpretiert und weiterentwickelt werden k{\"o}nnte. Diese Handreichung ist so konzipiert, dass sie je nach Interesse ausschnittweise gelesen werden kann: Auf einen {\"U}berblick {\"u}ber verschiedene Krabat-Bearbeitungen folgen Betrachtungen sorbischer Aspekte als auch M{\"o}glichkeiten einer Thematisierung {\"u}ber den Deutsch-Unterricht hinaus. Dabei wird auf M{\"o}glichkeiten einer Exkursion in die historische Krabat-Region in der Lausitz eingegangen. Es folgen Texte zu ausgew{\"a}hlten Einzelaspekten. Zudem enth{\"a}lt diese Publikation eine Zusammenstellung von verschiedenen Krabat-Materialien und Hinweise auf Unterrichtsprojekte zur Anregung, weiteren Vertiefung bzw. f{\"u}r den eigenen Unterrichtseinsatz.},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{RehseRiemerMeijeretal.2020,
  author    = {Rehse, Jessica and Riemer, Nathanael and Meijer, Saskia and Neumann, Helmuth Emanuel and Gottschalk, Matthias and Buttig, Steve and Gander, Heiko and West, Thomas and Gustavs, Jakob and Lehr, Moritz and Tobe, Mascha and Wendorf, Daniel and Bach-Sliwinski, Greta C{\"a}cilie and Ernst, Sebastian and Meier, Jan-Niklas},
  title     = {„Wir alle treffen Entscheidungen im Leben, aber letztendlich treffen unsere Entscheidungen uns."},
  editor    = {Rehse, Jessica and Riemer, Nathanael},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-489-0},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-46846},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-468467},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {424},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {„Wir alle treffen Entscheidungen im Leben, aber letztendlich treffen unsere Entscheidungen uns." So erging es den Herausgebern, nachdem sie sich dazu entschlossen hatten, Lehrveranstaltungen an der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam anzubieten, die sich mit dem Medium „Computerspiel" besch{\"a}ftigen sollten - und damit auf {\"u}berraschend große Resonanz stießen. Das Resultat ist vorliegendes Handbuch. Es m{\"o}chte Eltern, LehrerInnen und MultiplikatorInnen exemplarische Einblicke in die vielschichtigen Welten dieses Ph{\"a}nomens vermitteln. Bei den AutorInnen der Beitr{\"a}ge handelt es sich um EnthusiastInnen aus der Computerspielbranche sowie um videospielbegeisterte SozialarbeiterInnen, KulturwissenschaftlerInnen und LehrerInnen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{NeumannTiberiusBiendarra2022,
  author    = {Neumann, Daniel and Tiberius, Victor and Biendarra, Florin},
  title     = {Adopting wearables to customize health insurance contributions: a ranking-type Delphi},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {153},
  issn      = {1867-5808},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-56672},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-566723},
  pages     = {7},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background Wearables, as small portable computer systems worn on the body, can track user fitness and health data, which can be used to customize health insurance contributions individually. In particular, insured individuals with a healthy lifestyle can receive a reduction of their contributions to be paid. However, this potential is hardly used in practice. Objective This study aims to identify which barrier factors impede the usage of wearables for assessing individual risk scores for health insurances, despite its technological feasibility, and to rank these barriers according to their relevance. Methods To reach these goals, we conduct a ranking-type Delphi study with the following three stages. First, we collected possible barrier factors from a panel of 16 experts and consolidated them to a list of 11 barrier categories. Second, the panel was asked to rank them regarding their relevance. Third, to enhance the panel consensus, the ranking was revealed to the experts, who were then asked to re-rank the barriers. Results The results suggest that regulation is the most important barrier. Other relevant barriers are false or inaccurate measurements and application errors caused by the users. Additionally, insurers could lack the required technological competence to use the wearable data appropriately. Conclusion A wider use of wearables and health apps could be achieved through regulatory modifications, especially regarding privacy issues. Even after assuring stricter regulations, users' privacy concerns could partly remain, if the data exchange between wearables manufacturers, health app providers, and health insurers does not become more transparent.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{NeumannTiberiusBiendarra2022,
  author    = {Neumann, Daniel and Tiberius, Victor and Biendarra, Florin},
  title     = {Adopting wearables to customize health insurance contributions},
  series = {BMC medical informatics and decision making},
  volume    = {22},
  journal   = {BMC medical informatics and decision making},
  publisher = {Springer Nature},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1472-6947},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12911-022-01851-4},
  pages     = {1 -- 7},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background Wearables, as small portable computer systems worn on the body, can track user fitness and health data, which can be used to customize health insurance contributions individually. In particular, insured individuals with a healthy lifestyle can receive a reduction of their contributions to be paid. However, this potential is hardly used in practice. Objective This study aims to identify which barrier factors impede the usage of wearables for assessing individual risk scores for health insurances, despite its technological feasibility, and to rank these barriers according to their relevance. Methods To reach these goals, we conduct a ranking-type Delphi study with the following three stages. First, we collected possible barrier factors from a panel of 16 experts and consolidated them to a list of 11 barrier categories. Second, the panel was asked to rank them regarding their relevance. Third, to enhance the panel consensus, the ranking was revealed to the experts, who were then asked to re-rank the barriers. Results The results suggest that regulation is the most important barrier. Other relevant barriers are false or inaccurate measurements and application errors caused by the users. Additionally, insurers could lack the required technological competence to use the wearable data appropriately. Conclusion A wider use of wearables and health apps could be achieved through regulatory modifications, especially regarding privacy issues. Even after assuring stricter regulations, users' privacy concerns could partly remain, if the data exchange between wearables manufacturers, health app providers, and health insurers does not become more transparent.},
  language  = {en}
}