@book{ZhangPlauthEberhardtetal.2020,
  author    = {Zhang, Shuhao and Plauth, Max and Eberhardt, Felix and Polze, Andreas and Lehmann, Jens and Sejdiu, Gezim and Jabeen, Hajira and Servadei, Lorenzo and M{\"o}stl, Christian and B{\"a}r, Florian and Netzeband, Andr{\´e} and Schmidt, Rainer and Knigge, Marlene and Hecht, Sonja and Prifti, Loina and Krcmar, Helmut and Sapegin, Andrey and Jaeger, David and Cheng, Feng and Meinel, Christoph and Friedrich, Tobias and Rothenberger, Ralf and Sutton, Andrew M. and Sidorova, Julia A. and Lundberg, Lars and Rosander, Oliver and Sk{\"o}ld, Lars and Di Varano, Igor and van der Walt, Est{\´e}e and Eloff, Jan H. P. and Fabian, Benjamin and Baumann, Annika and Ermakova, Tatiana and Kelkel, Stefan and Choudhary, Yash and Cooray, Thilini and Rodr{\´i}guez, Jorge and Medina-P{\´e}rez, Miguel Angel and Trejo, Luis A. and Barrera-Animas, Ari Yair and Monroy-Borja, Ra{\´u}l and L{\´o}pez-Cuevas, Armando and Ram{\´i}rez-M{\´a}rquez, Jos{\´e} Emmanuel and Grohmann, Maria and Niederleithinger, Ernst and Podapati, Sasidhar and Schmidt, Christopher and Huegle, Johannes and de Oliveira, Roberto C. L. and Soares, F{\´a}bio Mendes and van Hoorn, Andr{\´e} and Neumer, Tamas and Willnecker, Felix and Wilhelm, Mathias and Kuster, Bernhard},
  title     = {HPI Future SOC Lab - Proceedings 2017},
  number    = {130},
  editor    = {Meinel, Christoph and Polze, Andreas and Beins, Karsten and Strotmann, Rolf and Seibold, Ulrich and R{\"o}dszus, Kurt and M{\"u}ller, J{\"u}rgen},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-475-3},
  issn      = {1613-5652},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-43310},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-433100},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {ix, 235},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The "HPI Future SOC Lab" is a cooperation of the Hasso Plattner Institute (HPI) and industry partners. Its mission is to enable and promote exchange and interaction between the research community and the industry partners. The HPI Future SOC Lab provides researchers with free of charge access to a complete infrastructure of state of the art hard and software. This infrastructure includes components, which might be too expensive for an ordinary research environment, such as servers with up to 64 cores and 2 TB main memory. The offerings address researchers particularly from but not limited to the areas of computer science and business information systems. Main areas of research include cloud computing, parallelization, and In-Memory technologies. This technical report presents results of research projects executed in 2017. Selected projects have presented their results on April 25th and November 15th 2017 at the Future SOC Lab Day events.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{GorskiJungLietal.2020,
  author    = {Gorski, Mathias and Jung, Bettina and Li, Yong and Matias-Garcia, Pamela R. and Wuttke, Matthias and Coassin, Stefan and Thio, Chris H. L. and Kleber, Marcus E. and Winkler, Thomas W. and Wanner, Veronika and Chai, Jin-Fang and Chu, Audrey Y. and Cocca, Massimiliano and Feitosa, Mary F. and Ghasemi, Sahar and Hoppmann, Anselm and Horn, Katrin and Li, Man and Nutile, Teresa and Scholz, Markus and Sieber, Karsten B. and Teumer, Alexander and Tin, Adrienne and Wang, Judy and Tayo, Bamidele O. and Ahluwalia, Tarunveer S. and Almgren, Peter and Bakker, Stephan J. L. and Banas, Bernhard and Bansal, Nisha and Biggs, Mary L. and Boerwinkle, Eric and B{\"o}ttinger, Erwin and Brenner, Hermann and Carroll, Robert J. and Chalmers, John and Chee, Miao-Li and Chee, Miao-Ling and Cheng, Ching-Yu and Coresh, Josef and de Borst, Martin H. and Degenhardt, Frauke and Eckardt, Kai-Uwe and Endlich, Karlhans and Franke, Andre and Freitag-Wolf, Sandra and Gampawar, Piyush and Gansevoort, Ron T. and Ghanbari, Mohsen and Gieger, Christian and Hamet, Pavel and Ho, Kevin and Hofer, Edith and Holleczek, Bernd and Foo, Valencia Hui Xian and Hutri-Kahonen, Nina and Hwang, Shih-Jen and Ikram, M. Arfan and Josyula, Navya Shilpa and Kahonen, Mika and Khor, Chiea-Chuen and Koenig, Wolfgang and Kramer, Holly and Kraemer, Bernhard K. and Kuehnel, Brigitte and Lange, Leslie A. and Lehtimaki, Terho and Lieb, Wolfgang and Loos, Ruth J. F. and Lukas, Mary Ann and Lyytikainen, Leo-Pekka and Meisinger, Christa and Meitinger, Thomas and Melander, Olle and Milaneschi, Yuri and Mishra, Pashupati P. and Mononen, Nina and Mychaleckyj, Josyf C. and Nadkarni, Girish N. and Nauck, Matthias and Nikus, Kjell and Ning, Boting and Nolte, Ilja M. and O'Donoghue, Michelle L. and Orho-Melander, Marju and Pendergrass, Sarah A. and Penninx, Brenda W. J. H. and Preuss, Michael H. and Psaty, Bruce M. and Raffield, Laura M. and Raitakari, Olli T. and Rettig, Rainer and Rheinberger, Myriam and Rice, Kenneth M. and Rosenkranz, Alexander R. and Rossing, Peter and Rotter, Jerome and Sabanayagam, Charumathi and Schmidt, Helena and Schmidt, Reinhold and Schoettker, Ben and Schulz, Christina-Alexandra and Sedaghat, Sanaz and Shaffer, Christian M. and Strauch, Konstantin and Szymczak, Silke and Taylor, Kent D. and Tremblay, Johanne and Chaker, Layal and van der Harst, Pim and van der Most, Peter J. and Verweij, Niek and Voelker, Uwe and Waldenberger, Melanie and Wallentin, Lars and Waterworth, Dawn M. and White, Harvey D. and Wilson, James G. and Wong, Tien-Yin and Woodward, Mark and Yang, Qiong and Yasuda, Masayuki and Yerges-Armstrong, Laura M. and Zhang, Yan and Snieder, Harold and Wanner, Christoph and Boger, Carsten A. and Kottgen, Anna and Kronenberg, Florian and Pattaro, Cristian and Heid, Iris M.},
  title     = {Meta-analysis uncovers genome-wide significant variants for rapid kidney function decline},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Reihe der Digital Engineering Fakult{\"a}t},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Reihe der Digital Engineering Fakult{\"a}t},
  number    = {19},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-56537},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-565379},
  pages     = {14},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Rapid decline of glomerular filtration rate estimated from creatinine (eGFRcrea) is associated with severe clinical endpoints. In contrast to cross-sectionally assessed eGFRcrea, the genetic basis for rapid eGFRcrea decline is largely unknown. To help define this, we meta-analyzed 42 genome-wide association studies from the Chronic Kidney Diseases Genetics Consortium and United Kingdom Biobank to identify genetic loci for rapid eGFRcrea decline. Two definitions of eGFRcrea decline were used: 3 mL/min/1.73m(2)/year or more ("Rapid3"; encompassing 34,874 cases, 107,090 controls) and eGFRcrea decline 25\% or more and eGFRcrea under 60 mL/min/1.73m(2) at follow-up among those with eGFRcrea 60 mL/min/1.73m(2) or more at baseline ("CKDi25"; encompassing 19,901 cases, 175,244 controls). Seven independent variants were identified across six loci for Rapid3 and/or CKDi25: consisting of five variants at four loci with genome-wide significance (near UMOD-PDILT (2), PRKAG2, WDR72, OR2S2) and two variants among 265 known eGFRcrea variants (near GATM, LARP4B). All these loci were novel for Rapid3 and/or CKDi25 and our bioinformatic follow-up prioritized variants and genes underneath these loci. The OR2S2 locus is novel for any eGFRcrea trait including interesting candidates. For the five genome-wide significant lead variants, we found supporting effects for annual change in blood urea nitrogen or cystatin-based eGFR, but not for GATM or (LARP4B). Individuals at high compared to those at low genetic risk (8-14 vs. 0-5 adverse alleles) had a 1.20-fold increased risk of acute kidney injury (95\% confidence interval 1.08-1.33). Thus, our identified loci for rapid kidney function decline may help prioritize therapeutic targets and identify mechanisms and individuals at risk for sustained deterioration of kidney function.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HuangDupontNivetLippertetal.2015,
  author    = {Huang, Wentao and Dupont-Nivet, Guillaume and Lippert, Peter C. and van Hinsbergen, Douwe J. J. and Dekkers, Mark J. and Guo, Zhaojie and Waldrip, Ross and Li, Xiaochun and Zhang, Xiaoran and Liu, Dongdong and Kapp, Paul},
  title     = {Can a primary remanence be retrieved from partially remagnetized Eocence volcanic rocks in the Nanmulin Basin (southern Tibet) to date the India-Asia collision?},
  series = {Journal of geophysical research : Solid earth},
  volume    = {120},
  journal   = {Journal of geophysical research : Solid earth},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {American Geophysical Union},
  address   = {Washington},
  issn      = {2169-9313},
  doi       = {10.1002/2014JB011599},
  pages     = {42 -- 66},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Paleomagnetic dating of the India-Asia collision hinges on determining the Paleogene latitude of the Lhasa terrane (southern Tibet). Reported latitudes range from 5 degrees N to 30 degrees N, however, leading to contrasting paleogeographic interpretations. Here we report new data from the Eocene Linzizong volcanic rocks in the Nanmulin Basin, which previously yielded data suggesting a low paleolatitude (similar to 10 degrees N). New zircon U-Pb dates indicate an age of similar to 52Ma. Negative fold tests, however, demonstrate that the isolated characteristic remanent magnetizations, with notably varying inclinations, are not primary. Rock magnetic analyses, end-member modeling of isothermal remanent magnetization acquisition curves, and petrographic observations are consistent with variable degrees of posttilting remagnetization due to low-temperature alteration of primary magmatic titanomagnetite and the formation of secondary pigmentary hematite that unblock simultaneously. Previously reported paleomagnetic data from the Nanmulin Basin implying low paleolatitude should thus not be used to estimate the time and latitude of the India-Asia collision. We show that the paleomagnetic inclinations vary linearly with the contribution of secondary hematite to saturation isothermal remanent magnetization. We tentatively propose a new method to recover a primary remanence with inclination of 38.1 degrees (35.7 degrees, 40.5 degrees) (95\% significance) and a secondary remanence with inclination of 42.9 degrees (41.5 degrees,44.4 degrees) (95\% significance). The paleolatitude defined by the modeled primary remanence21 degrees N (19.8 degrees N, 23.1 degrees N)is consistent with the regional compilation of published results from pristine volcanic rocks and sedimentary rocks of the upper Linzizong Group corrected for inclination shallowing. The start of the Tibetan Himalaya-Asia collision was situated at similar to 20 degrees N and took place by similar to 50Ma.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GorskiJungLietal.2020,
  author    = {Gorski, Mathias and Jung, Bettina and Li, Yong and Matias-Garcia, Pamela R. and Wuttke, Matthias and Coassin, Stefan and Thio, Chris H. L. and Kleber, Marcus E. and Winkler, Thomas W. and Wanner, Veronika and Chai, Jin-Fang and Chu, Audrey Y. and Cocca, Massimiliano and Feitosa, Mary F. and Ghasemi, Sahar and Hoppmann, Anselm and Horn, Katrin and Li, Man and Nutile, Teresa and Scholz, Markus and Sieber, Karsten B. and Teumer, Alexander and Tin, Adrienne and Wang, Judy and Tayo, Bamidele O. and Ahluwalia, Tarunveer S. and Almgren, Peter and Bakker, Stephan J. L. and Banas, Bernhard and Bansal, Nisha and Biggs, Mary L. and Boerwinkle, Eric and B{\"o}ttinger, Erwin and Brenner, Hermann and Carroll, Robert J. and Chalmers, John and Chee, Miao-Li and Chee, Miao-Ling and Cheng, Ching-Yu and Coresh, Josef and de Borst, Martin H. and Degenhardt, Frauke and Eckardt, Kai-Uwe and Endlich, Karlhans and Franke, Andre and Freitag-Wolf, Sandra and Gampawar, Piyush and Gansevoort, Ron T. and Ghanbari, Mohsen and Gieger, Christian and Hamet, Pavel and Ho, Kevin and Hofer, Edith and Holleczek, Bernd and Foo, Valencia Hui Xian and Hutri-Kahonen, Nina and Hwang, Shih-Jen and Ikram, M. Arfan and Josyula, Navya Shilpa and Kahonen, Mika and Khor, Chiea-Chuen and Koenig, Wolfgang and Kramer, Holly and Kraemer, Bernhard K. and Kuehnel, Brigitte and Lange, Leslie A. and Lehtimaki, Terho and Lieb, Wolfgang and Loos, Ruth J. F. and Lukas, Mary Ann and Lyytikainen, Leo-Pekka and Meisinger, Christa and Meitinger, Thomas and Melander, Olle and Milaneschi, Yuri and Mishra, Pashupati P. and Mononen, Nina and Mychaleckyj, Josyf C. and Nadkarni, Girish N. and Nauck, Matthias and Nikus, Kjell and Ning, Boting and Nolte, Ilja M. and O'Donoghue, Michelle L. and Orho-Melander, Marju and Pendergrass, Sarah A. and Penninx, Brenda W. J. H. and Preuss, Michael H. and Psaty, Bruce M. and Raffield, Laura M. and Raitakari, Olli T. and Rettig, Rainer and Rheinberger, Myriam and Rice, Kenneth M. and Rosenkranz, Alexander R. and Rossing, Peter and Rotter, Jerome and Sabanayagam, Charumathi and Schmidt, Helena and Schmidt, Reinhold and Schoettker, Ben and Schulz, Christina-Alexandra and Sedaghat, Sanaz and Shaffer, Christian M. and Strauch, Konstantin and Szymczak, Silke and Taylor, Kent D. and Tremblay, Johanne and Chaker, Layal and van der Harst, Pim and van der Most, Peter J. and Verweij, Niek and Voelker, Uwe and Waldenberger, Melanie and Wallentin, Lars and Waterworth, Dawn M. and White, Harvey D. and Wilson, James G. and Wong, Tien-Yin and Woodward, Mark and Yang, Qiong and Yasuda, Masayuki and Yerges-Armstrong, Laura M. and Zhang, Yan and Snieder, Harold and Wanner, Christoph and Boger, Carsten A. and Kottgen, Anna and Kronenberg, Florian and Pattaro, Cristian and Heid, Iris M.},
  title     = {Meta-analysis uncovers genome-wide significant variants for rapid kidney function decline},
  series = {Kidney international : official journal of the International Society of Nephrology},
  volume    = {99},
  journal   = {Kidney international : official journal of the International Society of Nephrology},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {New York},
  organization    = {Lifelines Cohort Study<br /> Regeneron Genetics Ctr},
  issn      = {0085-2538},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.kint.2020.09.030},
  pages     = {926 -- 939},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Rapid decline of glomerular filtration rate estimated from creatinine (eGFRcrea) is associated with severe clinical endpoints. In contrast to cross-sectionally assessed eGFRcrea, the genetic basis for rapid eGFRcrea decline is largely unknown. To help define this, we meta-analyzed 42 genome-wide association studies from the Chronic Kidney Diseases Genetics Consortium and United Kingdom Biobank to identify genetic loci for rapid eGFRcrea decline. Two definitions of eGFRcrea decline were used: 3 mL/min/1.73m(2)/year or more ("Rapid3"; encompassing 34,874 cases, 107,090 controls) and eGFRcrea decline 25\% or more and eGFRcrea under 60 mL/min/1.73m(2) at follow-up among those with eGFRcrea 60 mL/min/1.73m(2) or more at baseline ("CKDi25"; encompassing 19,901 cases, 175,244 controls). Seven independent variants were identified across six loci for Rapid3 and/or CKDi25: consisting of five variants at four loci with genome-wide significance (near UMOD-PDILT (2), PRKAG2, WDR72, OR2S2) and two variants among 265 known eGFRcrea variants (near GATM, LARP4B). All these loci were novel for Rapid3 and/or CKDi25 and our bioinformatic follow-up prioritized variants and genes underneath these loci. The OR2S2 locus is novel for any eGFRcrea trait including interesting candidates. For the five genome-wide significant lead variants, we found supporting effects for annual change in blood urea nitrogen or cystatin-based eGFR, but not for GATM or (LARP4B). Individuals at high compared to those at low genetic risk (8-14 vs. 0-5 adverse alleles) had a 1.20-fold increased risk of acute kidney injury (95\% confidence interval 1.08-1.33). Thus, our identified loci for rapid kidney function decline may help prioritize therapeutic targets and identify mechanisms and individuals at risk for sustained deterioration of kidney function.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SeroussiNowickiPayneetal.2020,
  author    = {Seroussi, Helene and Nowicki, Sophie and Payne, Antony J. and Goelzer, Heiko and Lipscomb, William H. and Abe-Ouchi, Ayako and Agosta, Cecile and Albrecht, Torsten and Asay-Davis, Xylar and Barthel, Alice and Calov, Reinhard and Cullather, Richard and Dumas, Christophe and Galton-Fenzi, Benjamin K. and Gladstone, Rupert and Golledge, Nicholas R. and Gregory, Jonathan M. and Greve, Ralf and Hattermann, Tore and Hoffman, Matthew J. and Humbert, Angelika and Huybrechts, Philippe and Jourdain, Nicolas C. and Kleiner, Thomas and Larour, Eric and Leguy, Gunter R. and Lowry, Daniel P. and Little, Chistopher M. and Morlighem, Mathieu and Pattyn, Frank and Pelle, Tyler and Price, Stephen F. and Quiquet, Aurelien and Reese, Ronja and Schlegel, Nicole-Jeanne and Shepherd, Andrew and Simon, Erika and Smith, Robin S. and Straneo, Fiammetta and Sun, Sainan and Trusel, Luke D. and Van Breedam, Jonas and van de Wal, Roderik S. W. and Winkelmann, Ricarda and Zhao, Chen and Zhang, Tong and Zwinger, Thomas},
  title     = {ISMIP6 Antarctica},
  series = {The Cryosphere : TC ; an interactive open access journal of the European Geosciences Union},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {The Cryosphere : TC ; an interactive open access journal of the European Geosciences Union},
  number    = {9},
  publisher = {Copernicus},
  address   = {G{\"o}ttingen},
  issn      = {1994-0416},
  doi       = {10.5194/tc-14-3033-2020},
  pages     = {3033 -- 3070},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Ice flow models of the Antarctic ice sheet are commonly used to simulate its future evolution in response to different climate scenarios and assess the mass loss that would contribute to future sea level rise. However, there is currently no consensus on estimates of the future mass balance of the ice sheet, primarily because of differences in the representation of physical processes, forcings employed and initial states of ice sheet models. This study presents results from ice flow model simulations from 13 international groups focusing on the evolution of the Antarctic ice sheet during the period 2015-2100 as part of the Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison for CMIP6 (ISMIP6). They are forced with outputs from a subset of models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5), representative of the spread in climate model results. Simulations of the Antarctic ice sheet contribution to sea level rise in response to increased warming during this period varies between 7:8 and 30.0 cm of sea level equivalent (SLE) under Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 scenario forcing. These numbers are relative to a control experiment with constant climate conditions and should therefore be added to the mass loss contribution under climate conditions similar to present-day conditions over the same period. The simulated evolution of the West Antarctic ice sheet varies widely among models, with an overall mass loss, up to 18.0 cm SLE, in response to changes in oceanic conditions. East Antarctica mass change varies between 6 :1 and 8.3 cm SLE in the simulations, with a significant increase in surface mass balance outweighing the increased ice discharge under most RCP 8.5 scenario forcings. The inclusion of ice shelf collapse, here assumed to be caused by large amounts of liquid water ponding at the surface of ice shelves, yields an additional simulated mass loss of 28mm compared to simulations without ice shelf collapse. The largest sources of uncertainty come from the climate forcing, the ocean-induced melt rates, the calibration of these melt rates based on oceanic conditions taken outside of ice shelf cavities and the ice sheet dynamic response to these oceanic changes. Results under RCP 2.6 scenario based on two CMIP5 climate models show an additional mass loss of 0 and 3 cm of SLE on average compared to simulations done under present-day conditions for the two CMIP5 forcings used and display limited mass gain in East Antarctica.},
  language  = {en}
}