@article{PerkinsPernaAdrianetal.2019,
  author    = {Perkins, Daniel M. and Perna, Andrea and Adrian, Rita and Cermeno, Pedro and Gaedke, Ursula and Huete-Ortega, Maria and White, Ethan P. and Yvon-Durocher, Gabriel},
  title     = {Energetic equivalence underpins the size structure of tree and phytoplankton communities},
  series = {Nature Communications},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Nature Communications},
  publisher = {Nature Publ. Group},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {2041-1723},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41467-018-08039-3},
  pages     = {8},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {The size structure of autotroph communities - the relative abundance of small vs. large individuals - shapes the functioning of ecosystems. Whether common mechanisms underpin the size structure of unicellular and multicellular autotrophs is, however, unknown. Using a global data compilation, we show that individual body masses in tree and phytoplankton communities follow power-law distributions and that the average exponents of these individual size distributions (ISD) differ. Phytoplankton communities are characterized by an average ISD exponent consistent with three-quarter-power scaling of metabolism with body mass and equivalence in energy use among mass classes. Tree communities deviate from this pattern in a manner consistent with equivalence in energy use among diameter size classes. Our findings suggest that whilst universal metabolic constraints ultimately underlie the emergent size structure of autotroph communities, divergent aspects of body size (volumetric vs. linear dimensions) shape the ecological outcome of metabolic scaling in forest vs. pelagic ecosystems.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{GaedkeSeifriedAdrian2004,
  author    = {Gaedke, Ursula and Seifried, Angelika and Adrian, Rita},
  title     = {Biomass size spectra and plankton diversity in a shallow eutrophic lake},
  issn      = {1434-2944},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {Biomass size spectra collate structural and functional attributes of plankton communities enabling standardised temporal and cross-system comparisons and may be rapidly obtained by automated particle counters. To examine how differences in plankton communities from highly eutrophic and more oligotrophic lakes are reflected in size spectra, a three-year time series of biomass size spectra was established for polymictic, eutrophic Lake M{\"u}ggelsee, based on approximately weekly sampling and microscopic enumeration. The continuous but often bumpy size spectra reflected appropriately the seasonal and trophy-related variations in the plankton composition and growth conditions and the potential impact of daphnids on smaller plankton. We tested the hypothesis that more diverse plankton communities have smoother size spectra than impoverished ones. The spectra of L. M{\"u}ggelsee and other more less eutrophic lakes covaried roughly with the functional diversity in total plankton composition but were unrelated to taxonomical diversity within the phyto- or mesozooplankton. The slopes of the normalised size spectra of Lake M{\"u}ggelsee were generally more negative than -1, exhibited a recurrent seasonal pattern, and were strongly correlated with crustacean biomass. In contrast to less eutrophic systems, slopes could not be used to quantify energy fluxes within the foodweb due to highly variable algal P/B ratios and frequently bumpy size distributions. The latter indicated stronger deviations from the ideal concept of a steady energy flow along the size gradient than found in e. g. large, mesotrophic Lake Constance.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{SommerAdrianDomisetal.2012,
  author    = {Sommer, Ulrich and Adrian, Rita and Domis, Lisette Nicole de Senerpont and Elser, James J. and Gaedke, Ursula and Ibelings, Bas and Jeppesen, Erik and Lurling, Miquel and Molinero, Juan Carlos and Mooij, Wolf M. and van Donk, Ellen and Winder, Monika},
  title     = {Beyond the Plankton Ecology Group (PEG) Model mechanisms driving plankton succession},
  series = {Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics},
  volume    = {43},
  journal   = {Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics},
  number    = {2-4},
  editor    = {Futuyma, DJ},
  publisher = {Annual Reviews},
  address   = {Palo Alto},
  isbn      = {978-0-8243-1443-9},
  issn      = {1543-592X},
  doi       = {10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160251},
  pages     = {429 -- 448},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {The seasonal succession of plankton is an annually repeated process of community assembly during which all major external factors and internal interactions shaping communities can be studied. A quarter of a century ago, the state of this understanding was described by the verbal plankton ecology group (PEG) model. It emphasized the role of physical factors, grazing and nutrient limitation for phytoplankton, and the role of food limitation and fish predation for zooplankton. Although originally targeted at lake ecosystems, it was also adopted by marine plankton ecologists. Since then, a suite of ecological interactions previously underestimated in importance have become research foci: overwintering of key organisms, the microbial food web, parasitism, and food quality as a limiting factor and an extended role of higher order predators. A review of the impact of these novel interactions on plankton seasonal succession reveals limited effects on gross seasonal biomass patterns, but strong effects on species replacements.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WeyhenmeyerAdrianGaedkeetal.2002,
  author    = {Weyhenmeyer, G. A. and Adrian, Rita and Gaedke, Ursula and Livingstone, D. M. and Maberly, Stephen C.},
  title     = {Response of phytoplankton in European lakes to a change in the North Atlantic Oscillation},
  issn      = {0368-0770},
  year      = {2002},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{PerkinsPernaAdrianetal.2019,
  author    = {Perkins, Daniel M. and Perna, Andrea and Adrian, Rita and Cerme{\~n}o, Pedro and Gaedke, Ursula and Huete-Ortega, Maria and White, Ethan P. and Yvon-Durocher, Gabriel},
  title     = {Energetic equivalence underpins the size structure of tree and phytoplankton communities},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {684},
  issn      = {1866-8372},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-42569},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-425695},
  pages     = {8},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {The size structure of autotroph communities - the relative abundance of small vs. large individuals - shapes the functioning of ecosystems. Whether common mechanisms underpin the size structure of unicellular and multicellular autotrophs is, however, unknown. Using a global data compilation, we show that individual body masses in tree and phytoplankton communities follow power-law distributions and that the average exponents of these individual size distributions (ISD) differ. Phytoplankton communities are characterized by an average ISD exponent consistent with three-quarter-power scaling of metabolism with body mass and equivalence in energy use among mass classes. Tree communities deviate from this pattern in a manner consistent with equivalence in energy use among diameter size classes. Our findings suggest that whilst universal metabolic constraints ultimately underlie the emergent size structure of autotroph communities, divergent aspects of body size (volumetric vs. linear dimensions) shape the ecological outcome of metabolic scaling in forest vs. pelagic ecosystems.},
  language  = {en}
}