@article{MorandiKailToedteretal.2017,
  author    = {Morandi, Bertrand and Kail, Jochem and T{\"o}dter, Anne and Wolter, Christian and Piegay, Herve},
  title     = {Diverse Approaches to Implement and Monitor River Restoration},
  series = {Environmental Management},
  volume    = {60},
  journal   = {Environmental Management},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {0364-152X},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00267-017-0923-3},
  pages     = {931 -- 946},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {River restoration is a main emphasis of river management in European countries. Cross-national comparisons of its implementation are still rare in scientific literature. Based on French and German national censuses, this study compares river restoration practices and monitoring by analysing 102 French and 270 German projects. This comparison aims to draw a spatial and temporal framework of restoration practices in both countries to identify potential drivers of cross-national similarities and differences. The results underline four major trends: (1) a lag of almost 15 years in river restoration implementation between France and Germany, with a consequently higher share of projects in Germany than in France, (2) substantial similarities in restored reach characteristics, short reach length, small rivers, and in "agricultural" areas, (3) good correspondences between stressors identified and restoration measures implemented. Morphological alterations were the most important highlighted stressors. River morphology enhancement, especially instream enhancements, were the most frequently implemented restoration measures. Some differences exist in specific restoration practices, as river continuity restoration were most frequently implemented in French projects, while large wood introduction or channel re-braiding were most frequently implemented in German projects, and (4) some quantitative and qualitative differences in monitoring practices and a significant lack of project monitoring, especially in Germany compared to France. These similarities and differences between Germany and France in restoration application and monitoring possibly result from a complex set of drivers that might be difficult to untangle (e.g., environmental, technical, political, cultural).},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{UusiHeikkilaBoeckenhoffWolteretal.2012,
  author    = {Uusi-Heikkila, Silva and Boeckenhoff, Linda and Wolter, Christian and Arlinghaus, Robert},
  title     = {Differential Allocation by Female Zebrafish (Danio rerio) to Different-Sized Males - An Example in a Fish Species Lacking Parental Care},
  series = {PLOS ONE},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {PLOS ONE},
  number    = {10},
  publisher = {PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE},
  address   = {SAN FRANCISCO},
  issn      = {1932-6203},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0048317},
  pages     = {7},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Organisms allocate resources to reproduction in response to the costs and benefits of current and future reproductive opportunities. According to the differential allocation hypothesis, females allocate more resources to high-quality males. We tested whether a fish species lacking parental care (zebrafish, Danio rerio) expresses male size-dependent differential allocation in monogamous spawning trials. In addition, we tested whether reproductive allocation by females is affected by previous experience of different-quality males, potentially indicating plasticity in mate choice. To that end, females were conditioned to large, small or random-sized males (controls) for 14 days to manipulate females\’ expectations of the future mate quality. Females showed a clear preference for large males in terms of spawning probability and clutch size independent of the conditioning treatment. However, when females experienced variation in male size (random-sized conditioning treatment) they discriminated less against small males compared to females conditioned to large and small males. This might suggest that differential allocation and size-dependent sexual selection is of less relevance in nature than revealed in the present laboratory study.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Wolter2010,
  author    = {Wolter, Christian},
  title     = {A methodology for model-driven process security},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  pages     = {xv, 144 S. : graph. Darst.},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {en}
}