@article{KuekenshoenerWohlwendNiemoelleretal.2014, author = {Kuekenshoener, Tim and Wohlwend, Daniel and Niemoeller, Christoph and Dondapati, Padmarupa and Speck, Janina and Adeniran, Adebola V. and Nieth, Anita and Gerhardt, Stefan and Einsle, Oliver and Mueller, Kristian M. and Arndt, Katja Maren}, title = {Improving coiled coil stability while maintaining specificity by a bacterial hitchhiker selection system}, series = {Journal of structural biology}, volume = {186}, journal = {Journal of structural biology}, number = {3}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {San Diego}, issn = {1047-8477}, doi = {10.1016/j.jsb.2014.03.002}, pages = {335 -- 348}, year = {2014}, abstract = {The design and selection of peptides targeting cellular proteins is challenging and often yields candidates with undesired properties. Therefore we deployed a new selection system based on the twin-arginine translocase (TAT) pathway of Escherichia coli, named hitchhiker translocation (HiT) selection. A pool of alpha-helix encoding sequences was designed and selected for interference with the coiled coil domain (CC) of a melanoma-associated basic-helix-loop-helix-leucine-zipper (bHLHLZ) protein, the microphthalmia associated transcription factor (MITF). One predominant sequence (iM10) was enriched during selection and showed remarkable protease resistance, high solubility and thermal stability while maintaining its specificity. Furthermore, it exhibited nanomolar range affinity towards the target peptide. A mutation screen indicated that target-binding helices of increased homodimer stability and improved expression rates were preferred in the selection process. The crystal structure of the iM10/MITF-CC heterodimer (2.1 angstrom) provided important structural insights and validated our design predictions. Importantly, iM10 did not only bind to the MITF coiled coil, but also to the markedly more stable HLHLZ domain of MITF. Characterizing the selected variants of the semi-rational library demonstrated the potential of the innovative bacterial selection approach. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.}, language = {en} } @article{KuekenshoenerHagemannWohlwendetal.2014, author = {Kuekenshoener, Tim and Hagemann, Urs B. and Wohlwend, Daniel and Raeuber, Christina and Baumann, Tobias and Keller, Sandro and Einsle, Oliver and Mueller, Kristian M. and Arndt, Katja Maren}, title = {Analysis of Selected and Designed Chimeric D- and L-alpha-Helix Assemblies}, series = {Biomacromolecules : an interdisciplinary journal focused at the interface of polymer science and the biological sciences}, volume = {15}, journal = {Biomacromolecules : an interdisciplinary journal focused at the interface of polymer science and the biological sciences}, number = {9}, publisher = {American Chemical Society}, address = {Washington}, issn = {1525-7797}, doi = {10.1021/bm5006883}, pages = {3296 -- 3305}, year = {2014}, abstract = {D-Peptides have been attributed pharmacological advantages over regular L-peptides, yet design rules are largely unknown. Based on a designed coiled coil-like D/L heterotetramer, named L-Base/D-Acid, we generated a library offering alternative residues for interaction with the D-peptide. Phage display selection yielded one predominant peptide, named HelixA, that differed at 13 positions from the scaffold helix. In addition to the observed D-/L-heterotetramers, ratio-dependent intermediate states were detected by isothermal titration calorimetry. Importantly, the formation of the selected HelixA/D-Acid bundle passes through fewer intermediate states than L-Base/D-Acid. Back mutation of HelixA core residues to L-Base (HelixLL) revealed that the residues at e/g-positions are responsible for the different intermediates. Furthermore, a Val-core variant (PeptideVV) was completely devoid of binding D-Acid, whereas an Ile-core helix (HelixII) interacted with D-Acid in a significantly more specific complex than L-Base.}, language = {en} }