@article{LuebbeWeske2011, author = {Luebbe, Alexander and Weske, Mathias}, title = {Bringing design thinking to business process modeling}, isbn = {978-3-642-13756-3}, year = {2011}, language = {en} } @unpublished{WeskeRinderleMaToumanietal.2013, author = {Weske, Mathias and Rinderle-Ma, Stefanie and Toumani, Farouk and Wolf, Karsten}, title = {Special section on BPM 2011 conference. - Special Issue}, series = {Information systems}, volume = {38}, journal = {Information systems}, number = {4}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0306-4379}, doi = {10.1016/j.is.2013.01.003}, pages = {545 -- 546}, year = {2013}, language = {en} } @unpublished{WeskeYangMaglio2012, author = {Weske, Mathias and Yang, Jian and Maglio, Paul P.}, title = {Special issue service oriented computing (ICSOC) guest editors' introduction}, series = {International journal of cooperative information systems}, volume = {21}, journal = {International journal of cooperative information systems}, number = {1}, publisher = {World Scientific}, address = {Singapore}, issn = {0218-8430}, doi = {10.1142/S0218843012020017}, pages = {1 -- 2}, year = {2012}, language = {en} } @article{WeidlichMendlingWeske2011, author = {Weidlich, Matthias and Mendling, Jan and Weske, Mathias}, title = {Efficient consistency measurement based on behavioral profiles of process models}, series = {IEEE transactions on software engineering}, volume = {37}, journal = {IEEE transactions on software engineering}, number = {3}, publisher = {Inst. of Electr. and Electronics Engineers}, address = {Los Alamitos}, issn = {0098-5589}, doi = {10.1109/TSE.2010.96}, pages = {410 -- 429}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Engineering of process-driven business applications can be supported by process modeling efforts in order to bridge the gap between business requirements and system specifications. However, diverging purposes of business process modeling initiatives have led to significant problems in aligning related models at different abstract levels and different perspectives. Checking the consistency of such corresponding models is a major challenge for process modeling theory and practice. In this paper, we take the inappropriateness of existing strict notions of behavioral equivalence as a starting point. Our contribution is a concept called behavioral profile that captures the essential behavioral constraints of a process model. We show that these profiles can be computed efficiently, i.e., in cubic time for sound free-choice Petri nets w.r.t. their number of places and transitions. We use behavioral profiles for the definition of a formal notion of consistency which is less sensitive to model projections than common criteria of behavioral equivalence and allows for quantifying deviation in a metric way. The derivation of behavioral profiles and the calculation of a degree of consistency have been implemented to demonstrate the applicability of our approach. We also report the findings from checking consistency between partially overlapping models of the SAP reference model.}, language = {en} } @unpublished{DumasReckerWeske2012, author = {Dumas, Marlon and Recker, Jan and Weske, Mathias}, title = {Management and engineering of process-aware information systems: Introduction to the special issue}, series = {INFORMATION SYSTEMS}, volume = {37}, journal = {INFORMATION SYSTEMS}, number = {2}, publisher = {PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD}, address = {OXFORD}, issn = {0306-4379}, doi = {10.1016/j.is.2011.09.003}, pages = {77 -- 79}, year = {2012}, language = {en} } @article{PolyvyanyyWeidlichWeske2011, author = {Polyvyanyy, Artem and Weidlich, Matthias and Weske, Mathias}, title = {Connectivity of workflow nets the foundations of stepwise verification}, series = {Acta informatica}, volume = {48}, journal = {Acta informatica}, number = {4}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {New York}, issn = {0001-5903}, doi = {10.1007/s00236-011-0137-8}, pages = {213 -- 242}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Behavioral models capture operational principles of real-world or designed systems. Formally, each behavioral model defines the state space of a system, i.e., its states and the principles of state transitions. Such a model is the basis for analysis of the system's properties. In practice, state spaces of systems are immense, which results in huge computational complexity for their analysis. Behavioral models are typically described as executable graphs, whose execution semantics encodes a state space. The structure theory of behavioral models studies the relations between the structure of a model and the properties of its state space. In this article, we use the connectivity property of graphs to achieve an efficient and extensive discovery of the compositional structure of behavioral models; behavioral models get stepwise decomposed into components with clear structural characteristics and inter-component relations. At each decomposition step, the discovered compositional structure of a model is used for reasoning on properties of the whole state space of the system. The approach is exemplified by means of a concrete behavioral model and verification criterion. That is, we analyze workflow nets, a well-established tool for modeling behavior of distributed systems, with respect to the soundness property, a basic correctness property of workflow nets. Stepwise verification allows the detection of violations of the soundness property by inspecting small portions of a model, thereby considerably reducing the amount of work to be done to perform soundness checks. Besides formal results, we also report on findings from applying our approach to an industry model collection.}, language = {en} } @article{WeidlichZiekowGaletal.2014, author = {Weidlich, Matthias and Ziekow, Holger and Gal, Avigdor and Mendling, Jan and Weske, Mathias}, title = {Optimizing event pattern matching using business process models}, series = {IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering}, volume = {26}, journal = {IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering}, number = {11}, publisher = {Inst. of Electr. and Electronics Engineers}, address = {Los Alamitos}, issn = {1041-4347}, doi = {10.1109/TKDE.2014.2302306}, pages = {2759 -- 2773}, year = {2014}, abstract = {A growing number of enterprises use complex event processing for monitoring and controlling their operations, while business process models are used to document working procedures. In this work, we propose a comprehensive method for complex event processing optimization using business process models. Our proposed method is based on the extraction of behaviorial constraints that are used, in turn, to rewrite patterns for event detection, and select and transform execution plans. We offer a set of rewriting rules that is shown to be complete with respect to the all, seq, and any patterns. The effectiveness of our method is demonstrated in an experimental evaluation with a large number of processes from an insurance company. We illustrate that the proposed optimization leads to significant savings in query processing. By integrating the optimization in state-of-the-art systems for event pattern matching, we demonstrate that these savings materialize in different technical infrastructures and can be combined with existing optimization techniques.}, language = {en} } @article{KunzeWeidlichWeske2015, author = {Kunze, Matthias and Weidlich, Matthias and Weske, Mathias}, title = {Querying process models by behavior inclusion}, series = {Software and systems modeling}, volume = {14}, journal = {Software and systems modeling}, number = {3}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Heidelberg}, issn = {1619-1366}, doi = {10.1007/s10270-013-0389-6}, pages = {1105 -- 1125}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Business processes are vital to managing organizations as they sustain a company's competitiveness. Consequently, these organizations maintain collections of hundreds or thousands of process models for streamlining working procedures and facilitating process implementation. Yet, the management of large process model collections requires effective searching capabilities. Recent research focused on similarity search of process models, but querying process models is still a largely open topic. This article presents an approach to querying process models that takes a process example as input and discovers all models that allow replaying the behavior of the query. To this end, we provide a notion of behavioral inclusion that is based on trace semantics and abstraction. Additional to deciding a match, a closeness score is provided that describes how well the behavior of the query is represented in the model and can be used for ranking. The article introduces the formal foundations of the approach and shows how they are applied to querying large process model collections. An experimental evaluation has been conducted that confirms the suitability of the solution as well as its applicability and scalability in practice.}, language = {en} } @article{HerzbergMeyerWeske2015, author = {Herzberg, Nico and Meyer, Andreas and Weske, Mathias}, title = {Improving business process intelligence by observing object state transitions}, series = {Data \& knowledge engineering}, volume = {98}, journal = {Data \& knowledge engineering}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0169-023X}, doi = {10.1016/j.datak.2015.07.008}, pages = {144 -- 164}, year = {2015}, abstract = {During the execution of business processes several events happen that are recorded in the company's information systems. These events deliver insights into process executions so that process monitoring and analysis can be performed resulting, for instance, in prediction of upcoming process steps or the analysis of the run time of single steps. While event capturing is trivial when a process engine with integrated logging capabilities is used, manual process execution environments do not provide automatic logging of events, so that typically external devices, like bar code scanners, have to be used. As experience shows, these manual steps are error-prone and induce additional work. Therefore, we use object state transitions as additional monitoring information, so-called object state transition events. Based on these object state transition events, we reason about the enablement and termination of activities and provide the basis for process monitoring and analysis in terms of a large event log. In this paper, we present the concept to utilize information from these object state transition events for capturing process progress. Furthermore, we discuss a methodology to create the required design time artifacts that then are used for monitoring at run time. In a proof-of-concept implementation, we show how the design time and run time side work and prove applicability of the introduced concept of object state transition events. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.}, language = {en} } @article{BaierMendlingWeske2014, author = {Baier, Thomas and Mendling, Jan and Weske, Mathias}, title = {Bridging abstraction layers in process mining}, series = {Information systems}, volume = {46}, journal = {Information systems}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0306-4379}, doi = {10.1016/j.is.2014.04.004}, pages = {123 -- 139}, year = {2014}, abstract = {While the maturity of process mining algorithms increases and more process mining tools enter the market, process mining projects still face the problem of different levels of abstraction when comparing events with modeled business activities. Current approaches for event log abstraction try to abstract from the events in an automated way that does not capture the required domain knowledge to fit business activities. This can lead to misinterpretation of discovered process models. We developed an approach that aims to abstract an event log to the same abstraction level that is needed by the business. We use domain knowledge extracted from existing process documentation to semi-automatically match events and activities. Our abstraction approach is able to deal with n:m relations between events and activities and also supports concurrency. We evaluated our approach in two case studies with a German IT outsourcing company. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.}, language = {en} }