@article{SultanowVladovaWeber2009, author = {Sultanow, Eldar and Vladova, Gergana and Weber, Edzard}, title = {Overcoming communication barriers for CMC in enterprises}, isbn = {978-0-615-30358-1}, year = {2009}, language = {en} } @article{VladovaBahrs2014, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Bahrs, Julian}, title = {Wissenstransfer als Mittel der internen Unternehmenskommunikation}, series = {Handbuch prozessorientiertes Wissensmanagment}, journal = {Handbuch prozessorientiertes Wissensmanagment}, publisher = {GITO}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-95545-026-7}, pages = {37 -- 47}, year = {2014}, language = {de} } @article{VladovaBahrs2009, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Bahrs, Julian}, title = {Wissenstransfer als Mittel der internen Unternehmenskommunikation : eine explorative Untersuchung in neun internationalen Unternehmen}, isbn = {978-3-88579-239-0}, year = {2009}, language = {de} } @article{VladovaAdelhelm2009, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Adelhelm, Silvia}, title = {Informal knowledge flows in open innovation : both a blessing and a curse?}, isbn = {978-952-214-767-7}, year = {2009}, language = {en} } @article{VladovaWeber2009, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Weber, Edzard}, title = {Bedarf von KMU f{\"u}r anwendergerechte Aufbereitung von Norminhalten}, issn = {0722-2912}, year = {2009}, language = {de} } @article{BahrsVladova2009, author = {Bahrs, Julian and Vladova, Gergana}, title = {Produktpiraterie : Pr{\"a}vention statt Reaktion}, issn = {1438-4426}, year = {2009}, language = {de} } @article{EppingerVladova2013, author = {Eppinger, Elisabeth and Vladova, Gergana}, title = {Intellectual property management practices at small and medium-sized enterprises}, series = {International journal of technology management}, volume = {61}, journal = {International journal of technology management}, number = {1}, publisher = {Inderscience Enterprises Ltd}, address = {Geneva}, issn = {0267-5730}, doi = {10.1504/IJTM.2013.050244}, pages = {64 -- 81}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) contribute to innovation and economic growth, despite their resource shortages and lack of professional intellectual property (IP) management practices. Drawing on social practice theory and combining insights from recent scholarship on IP strategies and its management, this paper examines the cases of three pharmaceutical SME providing insights into how they appropriate returns on research and development (R\&D) investments. It discusses their IP strategies and management practices, examining how the IP management practices are embedded in the firm's organisational structure. Moreover, this paper develops recommendations for SME regarding the professionalisation of their IP management practices.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{VladovaJenniferStricker2022, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Jennifer, Haase and Stricker, Dennis}, title = {Acceptance in Human-Robot Interaction}, address = {Sydney}, year = {2022}, abstract = {This paper aims to contribute to exploring the design possibilities of robots for use in human-robot interaction. In an experiment, we investigate the influence of the human's personality and the robot's design, especially its humanization, on its acceptance. We use the Almere model, the Big 5 personality traits, and the anthropomorphic gestalt variants to build the foundation for our investigation. The assumption that an anthropomorphized robot variant would, in principle, be preferred to the standard variant when a natural choice is enforced could not be evidenced in our experiment. This allows for the interpretation that anthropomorphism does not necessarily lead to intentional perception and, consequently, does not guarantee that it can automatically generate acceptance.}, language = {en} } @article{UllrichVladova2016, author = {Ullrich, Andre and Vladova, Gergana}, title = {Weighing the Pros and Cons of Engaging in Open Innovation}, series = {Technology Innovation Management Review}, volume = {8}, journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review}, publisher = {Carleton University Graphic Services}, address = {Ottawa}, issn = {1927-0321}, pages = {34 -- 40}, year = {2016}, abstract = {The positive aspects of open innovation projects are widely discussed in innovation management research and practice by means of case studies and best practices. However, enterprises, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) also face miscellaneous challenges in open innovation practice, leading to uncertainty and even renunciation of open innovation project participation. Thus, it is essential for SMEs to find the right balance between possible positive effects and negative consequences - the latter being the less studied "dark sides" of open innovation. However, appropriate methods of finding this balance are still lacking. In this article, we discuss the assessment of open innovation project participation by presenting a weighing and decision process framework as a conceivable solution approach. The framework includes an internal, external, and integrated analysis as well as a recommendation and decision phase. Piece by piece, we investigate the current situation and the innovation goals of the enterprise as an initial point for a decision for or against engaging in open innovation. Furthermore, we discuss the development of a software tool that automatically applies this framework and allows self-assessment by SMEs.}, language = {en} } @article{ScheelVladovaUllrich2022, author = {Scheel, Laura and Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e}}, title = {The influence of digital competences, self-organization, and independent learning abilities on students' acceptance of digital learning}, series = {International journal of educational technology in higher education}, volume = {19}, journal = {International journal of educational technology in higher education}, number = {44}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, issn = {2365-9440}, doi = {10.1186/s41239-022-00350-w}, pages = {33}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Despite digital learning disrupting traditional learning concepts and activities in higher education, for the successful integration of digital learning, the use and acceptance of the students are essential. This acceptance depends in turn on students' characteristics and dispositions, among other factors. In our study, we investigated the influence of digital competences, self-organization, and independent learning abilities on students' acceptance of digital learning and the influence of their acceptance on the resistance to the change from face-to-face to digital learning. To do so, we surveyed 350 students and analyzed the impact of the different dispositions using ordinary least squares regression analysis. We could confirm a significant positive influence of all the tested dispositions on the acceptance of digital learning. With the results, we can contribute to further investigating the underlying factors that can lead to more positive student perceptions of digital learning and build a foundation for future strategies of implementing digital learning into higher education successfully.}, language = {en} } @article{VladovaUllrichBender2021, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Bender, Benedict}, title = {Chancen und Grenzen digitaler Lehre an Hochschulen aus Studierendenperspektive}, series = {HMD : Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik}, volume = {58}, journal = {HMD : Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Wiesbaden}, issn = {2198-2775}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1365/s40702-021-00796-y}, pages = {1313 -- 1326}, year = {2021}, abstract = {The design of qualitative, excellent teaching requires collaboration between teachers and learners. For this purpose, face-to-face teaching benefits from a long-standing tradition, while digital teaching is comparatively still at the beginning of its dissemination. A major developmental step toward the digitization of teaching was achieved in the context of university teaching during the Covid 19 pandemic in spring 2020, when face-to-face teaching was interrupted for months. During this time, important insights into the opportunities and limitations of digital teaching were gained. This paper presents selected results of a study conducted at four German universities and with 875 responses in spring 2020. The study uncovers opportunities and limitations of digital teaching from the students' perspective and against the background of their experience in the completely digital semester. The results are used as a basis for deriving design guidelines for digital teaching and learning offerings. Based on a model for analyzing the design of teaching and learning formats, these indications are structured according to the elements learners, teachers, teaching content, environment and teaching style.}, language = {de} } @article{VladovaHeutsTeichmann2021, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Heuts, Alexander and Teichmann, Malte}, title = {Dem Mitarbeiter zu Diensten}, series = {HMD : Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik}, journal = {HMD : Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik}, number = {57}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Wiesbaden}, issn = {1436-3011}, doi = {doi.org/10.1365/s40702-020-00626-7}, pages = {710 -- 721}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Die Weiterbildung und Qualifizierung der Mitarbeiter sind zentrale Erfolgsfaktoren des digitalen Wandels. Die zentrale Herausforderung besteht darin, diese maßgeschnitten anzubieten sowie notwendige Akzeptanz nicht vorauszusetzen, sondern ebenso als Zielgr{\"o}ße anzusehen. Dies geschieht jedoch nur, wenn die Mitarbeiter als Partner gesehen werden, deren Bed{\"u}rfnisse und Verst{\"a}ndnis nachhaltig ber{\"u}cksichtigt werden. Dieser Beitrag schl{\"a}gt vor diesem Hintergrund einen Ansatz vor, Weiterbildung als Personennahe Dienstleistung zu realisieren. Daf{\"u}r wird zuerst ein skizzenhafter {\"U}berblick {\"u}ber grundlegende Kompetenzanforderungen des digitalen Wandels gegeben. Danach wird die aktuelle Situation betrieblicher Weiterbildung in der digitalen Transformation beleuchtet. Hierzu wurde in einem Zeitraum von sechs Monaten im Rahmen einer quantitativen Untersuchung erhoben, wie Besch{\"a}ftigte die digitale Transformation ihres Unternehmens und daraus resultierende Bedarfe betrieblicher Weiterbildung wahrnehmen. Darauf basierend werden drei aktuelle Paradoxe abgeleitet, die mit einer Durchf{\"u}hrung von Weiterbildung als Personennahe Dienstleistung verhindert werden k{\"o}nnen. Empfehlungen und L{\"o}sungsans{\"a}tze werden hierzu diskutiert und weiterer Forschungsbedarf abgeleitet.}, language = {de} } @article{TeichmannVladovaGronau2023, author = {Teichmann, Malte and Vladova, Gergana and Gronau, Norbert}, title = {Conception of subject-oriented learning}, series = {SSRN eLibrary / Social Science Research Network}, journal = {SSRN eLibrary / Social Science Research Network}, publisher = {Social Science Electronic Publ.}, address = {[Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]}, issn = {1556-5068}, doi = {10.2139/ssrn.4457995}, pages = {6}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Competence development must change at all didactic levels to meet the new requirements triggered by digitization. Unlike classic learning theories and the resulting popular approaches (e.g., sender-receiver model), future-oriented vocational training must include new learning theory impulses in the discussion about competence acquisition. On the one hand, these impulses are often very well elaborated on the theoretical side, but the transfer into innovative learning environments - such as learning factories - is often still missing. On the other hand, actual learning factory (design) approaches often concentrate primarily on the technical side. Subject-oriented learning theory enables the design of competence development-oriented vocational training projectsin learning factories in which persons can obtain relevant competencies for digitization. At the same time, such learning theory approaches assume a potentially infinite number of learning interests and reasons. Following this, competence development is always located in an institutional or organizational context. The paper conceptionally answers how this theoryimmanent challenge is synthesizable with the reality of organizationally competence development requirements.}, language = {en} } @misc{UllrichVladovaEigelshovenetal.2022, author = {Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Vladova, Gergana and Eigelshoven, Felix and Renz, Andr{\´e}}, title = {Data mining of scientific research on artificial intelligence in teaching and administration in higher education institutions}, series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {160}, issn = {1867-5808}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-58907}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-589077}, pages = {18}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Teaching and learning as well as administrative processes are still experiencing intensive changes with the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and its diverse application opportunities in the context of higher education. Therewith, the scientific interest in the topic in general, but also specific focal points rose as well. However, there is no structured overview on AI in teaching and administration processes in higher education institutions that allows to identify major research topics and trends, and concretizing peculiarities and develops recommendations for further action. To overcome this gap, this study seeks to systematize the current scientific discourse on AI in teaching and administration in higher education institutions. This study identified an (1) imbalance in research on AI in educational and administrative contexts, (2) an imbalance in disciplines and lack of interdisciplinary research, (3) inequalities in cross-national research activities, as well as (4) neglected research topics and paths. In this way, a comparative analysis between AI usage in administration and teaching and learning processes, a systematization of the state of research, an identification of research gaps as well as further research path on AI in higher education institutions are contributed to research.}, language = {en} } @article{UllrichVladovaEigelshovenetal.2022, author = {Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Vladova, Gergana and Eigelshoven, Felix and Renz, Andr{\´e}}, title = {Data mining of scientific research on artificial intelligence in teaching and administration in higher education institutions}, series = {Discover artificial intelligence}, volume = {2}, journal = {Discover artificial intelligence}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, issn = {2731-0809}, doi = {10.1007/s44163-022-00031-7}, pages = {18}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Teaching and learning as well as administrative processes are still experiencing intensive changes with the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and its diverse application opportunities in the context of higher education. Therewith, the scientific interest in the topic in general, but also specific focal points rose as well. However, there is no structured overview on AI in teaching and administration processes in higher education institutions that allows to identify major research topics and trends, and concretizing peculiarities and develops recommendations for further action. To overcome this gap, this study seeks to systematize the current scientific discourse on AI in teaching and administration in higher education institutions. This study identified an (1) imbalance in research on AI in educational and administrative contexts, (2) an imbalance in disciplines and lack of interdisciplinary research, (3) inequalities in cross-national research activities, as well as (4) neglected research topics and paths. In this way, a comparative analysis between AI usage in administration and teaching and learning processes, a systematization of the state of research, an identification of research gaps as well as further research path on AI in higher education institutions are contributed to research.}, language = {en} } @incollection{VladovaUllrichBenderetal.2021, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Bender, Benedict and Gronau, Norbert}, title = {Yes, we can (?)}, series = {Technology and innovation in learning, teaching and education : second international conference, TECH-EDU 2020, Vila Real, Portugal, December 2-4, 2020 : proceedings}, booktitle = {Technology and innovation in learning, teaching and education : second international conference, TECH-EDU 2020, Vila Real, Portugal, December 2-4, 2020 : proceedings}, editor = {Reis, Ars{\´e}nio and Barroso, Jo{\~a}o and Lopes, J. Bernardino and Mikropoulos, Tassos and Fan, Chih-Wen}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, isbn = {978-3-030-73987-4}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-73988-1_17}, pages = {225 -- 235}, year = {2021}, abstract = {The COVID-19 crisis has caused an extreme situation for higher education institutions around the world, where exclusively virtual teaching and learning has become obligatory rather than an additional supporting feature. This has created opportunities to explore the potential and limitations of virtual learning formats. This paper presents four theses on virtual classroom teaching and learning that are discussed critically. We use existing theoretical insights extended by empirical evidence from a survey of more than 850 students on acceptance, expectations, and attitudes regarding the positive and negative aspects of virtual teaching. The survey responses were gathered from students at different universities during the first completely digital semester (Spring-Summer 2020) in Germany. We discuss similarities and differences between the subjects being studied and highlight the advantages and disadvantages of virtual teaching and learning. Against the background of existing theory and the gathered data, we emphasize the importance of social interaction, the combination of different learning formats, and thus context-sensitive hybrid learning as the learning form of the future.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Vladova2018, author = {Vladova, Gergana}, title = {Wissensmanagement im Kontext der Interdependenzen zwischen Unternehmenskultur und beruflicher kultureller Pr{\"a}gung}, publisher = {Gito}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-95545-223-0}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {286}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Neben der vorherrschenden Unternehmenskultur existieren innerhalb der Organisationen unterschiedliche Subkulturen. Eine solche Subkultur - die berufliche - ist im Kontext dieser Arbeit von Bedeutung. Ihr Einfluss auf das Individuum in Form einer sekund{\"a}ren Sozialisation f{\"a}ngt in der Regel noch vor dem Eintritt im Unternehmen an und kann je nach Dauer der Einflussnahme und St{\"a}rke der Unternehmens- und der Subkulturen unterschiedlich sein. Im Mittelpunkt des Buches steht die Untersuchung der Abh{\"a}ngigkeiten zwischen der beruflichen kulturellen Pr{\"a}gung der Mitarbeiter und dem Umgang mit Wissen im Unternehmenskontext. Das Buch bietet einen theoretischen {\"U}berblick {\"u}ber die relevanten Themenfelder, stellt die Entwicklung eines Modells der Interdependenzen zwischen Wissensmanagement, Unternehmenskultur und beruflicher Subkultur vor und diskutiert erste Ergebnisse zur empirischen Untersuchung der Interdependenzen sowie das hierzu entwickelte Instrument.}, language = {de} } @article{GronauVladovaWeberetal.2014, author = {Gronau, Norbert and Vladova, Gergana and Weber, Nadja and Heinze, Priscilla and Weber, Edzard}, title = {KMDL® v2.2}, series = {Handbuch prozessorientiertes Wissensmanagment}, journal = {Handbuch prozessorientiertes Wissensmanagment}, publisher = {GITO}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-95545-026-7}, pages = {133 -- 198}, year = {2014}, language = {de} } @article{GronauRegerAdelhelmetal.2009, author = {Gronau, Norbert and Reger, Guido and Adelhelm, Silvia and Bahrs, Julian and Vladova, Gergana}, title = {Planung und Steuerung von offenen Innovationsprozessen in Life Sciences KMUs : Pro und Contra des Know-how- Transfers {\"u}ber die Unternehmensgrenzen}, issn = {1434-1890}, year = {2009}, language = {de} } @book{AdelhelmBraunGronauetal.2010, author = {Adelhelm, Silvia and Braun, Andreas and Gronau, Norbert and M{\"u}ller, E. and Vladova, Gergana}, title = {Open Innovation : Methodologische Pr{\"a}zisierung und praktische Umsetzung im Projekt Open Innovation in Life Sciences}, isbn = {978-3-8396-0141-9}, year = {2010}, language = {de} }