@article{BinzenhoeferSchroderStraussetal.2005,
  author    = {Binzenh{\"o}fer, Birgit and Schroder, B. and Strauss, B. and Biedermann, Robert and Settele, Josef},
  title     = {Habitat models and habitat connectivity analysis for butterflies and burnet moths : the example of Zygaena carniolica and Coenonympha arcania},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {In this paper, habitat models were used to predict potential habitat for endangered species, which is an important question in landscape and conservation planning. Based on logistic regression, we developed habitat distribution models for the burnet moth Zygaena carniolica and the nymphalid butterfly Coenonympha arcania in Northern Bavaria, Germany. The relation between adult occurrence and habitat parameters, including the influence of landscape context, was analyzed on, 118 sites. Habitat connectivity analyses were carried out on the basis of (1) habitat suitability maps generated from these models and (2) dispersal data from mark recapture studies. Our results showed that (1) the presence of the burnet depended mainly on the presence of nectar plants and of nutrient-poor dry grasslands in direct vicinity, that of the nymphalid on larger areas of extensively used dry grasslands within 100 m vicinity in combination with small patches of higher shrubs and bushes. (2) Internal as well as external validation indicated the robustness and general applicability of the models. Transferability in time and space indicated their high potential relevance for applications in nature conservation, such as predicting possible effects of land use changes. (3) Habitat connectivity analyses revealed a high degree of habitat connectivity within the study area. Thus, we could show no effects of isolation or habitat size for both species. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KleyerSchroederEsselbachBiedermannetal.2004,
  author    = {Kleyer, Michael and Schr{\"o}der-Esselbach, Boris and Biedermann, Robert and Rudner, Michael and Fritzsch, K. and K{\"u}hner, A. and Poschlod, P. and Kahmen, S. and Tackenberg, O. and Talmon, E. and Poethke, H.-J. and Obermaier, E. and Hein, S. and Hinsch, M. and Henle, K. and Settele, Josef and Binzenh{\"o}fer, Birgit and Pfeifer, A. and K{\"o}gl, H.},
  title     = {Freie Beweidung mit geringer Besatzdichte und Fr{\"a}sen als alternative Verfahren zur Pflege von Magerrasen},
  issn      = {0341-7026},
  year      = {2004},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{GoergSpangenbergTekkenetal.2014,
  author    = {Goerg, Christoph and Spangenberg, Joachim H. and Tekken, Vera and Burkhard, Benjamin and Da Thanh Truong, and Escalada, Monina and Heong, Kong Luen and Arida, Gertrudo and Marquez, Leonardo V. and Bustamante, Jesus Victor and Ho Van Chien, and Klotzbuecher, Thimo and Marxen, Anika and Nguyen Hung Man, and Nguyen Van Sinh, and Villareal, Sylvia (Bong) and Settele, Josef},
  title     = {Engaging local knowledge in biodiversity research: experiences from large inter- and transdisciplinary projects},
  series = {Interdisciplinary science reviews},
  volume    = {39},
  journal   = {Interdisciplinary science reviews},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Leeds},
  issn      = {0308-0188},
  doi       = {10.1179/0308018814Z.00000000095},
  pages     = {323 -- 341},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {The management of biodiversity represents a research topic that needs to involve not only several (sub-) disciplines from the natural sciences but, in particular, also the social sciences and humanities. Furthermore, over the last couple of years, the need for the integration of other kinds of knowledge (experience based or indigenous knowledge) is increasingly acknowledged. For instance, the incorporation of such knowledge is indispensable for place-based approaches to sustainable land management, which require that the specific ecological and social context is addressed. However, desirable as it may be, such an engagement of the holders of tacit knowledge is not easy to achieve. It demands reconciling well-established scientific procedural standards with the implicit or explicit criteria of relevance that apply in civil society a process that typically causes severe tensions and comes up against both habitual as well as institutional constraints. The difficulty of managing such tensions is amplified particularly in large integrated projects and represents a major challenge to project management. At the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, several integrated research projects have been conducted over the past years in which experience has been gained with these specific challenges. This paper presents some of the lessons learned from large integrated projects, with an emphasis on project design and management structure. At the centre of the present contribution are experiences gained in the coordination and management of LEGATO (LEGATO stands for Land-use intensity and Ecological EnGineering - Assessment Tools for risks and Opportunities in irrigated rice based production systems, see www.legato-project.net), an ongoing, large-scale, inter- and transdisciplinary research project dealing with the management of irrigated rice landscapes in Southeast Asia. In this project, local expertise on traditional production systems is absolutely crucial but needs to be integrated with natural and social science research to identify future-proof land management systems.},
  language  = {en}
}