@article{Schwarz2019,
  author    = {Schwarz, Anja},
  title     = {Melancholia},
  series = {Cultural studies review},
  volume    = {25},
  journal   = {Cultural studies review},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Melbourne Univ. Press},
  address   = {Sydney},
  issn      = {1837-8692},
  doi       = {10.5130/csr.v25i2.6918},
  pages     = {259 -- 261},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EcksteinSchwarz2019,
  author    = {Eckstein, Lars and Schwarz, Anja},
  title     = {The making of Tupaia's map},
  series = {The journal of pacific history},
  volume    = {54},
  journal   = {The journal of pacific history},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {0022-3344},
  doi       = {10.1080/00223344.2018.1512369},
  pages     = {1 -- 95},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Tupaia's Map is one of the most famous and enigmatic artefacts to emerge from the early encounters between Europeans and Pacific Islanders. It was drawn by Tupaia, an arioi priest, chiefly advisor and master navigator from Ra'iātea in the Leeward Society Islands in collaboration with various members of the crew of James Cook's Endeavour, in two distinct moments of mapmaking and three draft stages between August 1769 and February 1770. To this day, the identity of many islands on the chart, and the logic of their arrangement have posed a riddle to researchers. Drawing in part on archival material hitherto overlooked, in this long essay we propose a new understanding of the chart's cartographic logic, offer a detailed reconstruction of its genesis, and thus for the first time present a comprehensive reading of Tupaia's Map. The chart not only underscores the extent and mastery of Polynesian navigation, it is also a remarkable feat of translation between two very different wayfinding systems and their respective representational models.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{BarrettEcksteinHurleyetal.2018,
  author    = {Barrett, Lindsay and Eckstein, Lars and Hurley, Andrew Wright and Schwarz, Anja},
  title     = {Remembering German-Australian colonial entanglement},
  series = {Postcolonial studies : culture, politics, economy},
  volume    = {21},
  journal   = {Postcolonial studies : culture, politics, economy},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {1368-8790},
  doi       = {10.1080/13688790.2018.1443671},
  pages     = {1 -- 5},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EcksteinPeitschSchwarz2017,
  author    = {Eckstein, Lars and Peitsch, Helmut and Schwarz, Anja},
  title     = {Tusitalas Wandlungen},
  series = {Pazifikismus : Poetiken des Stillen Ozeans},
  journal   = {Pazifikismus : Poetiken des Stillen Ozeans},
  publisher = {K{\"o}nigshausen \& Neumann},
  address   = {W{\"u}rzburg},
  isbn      = {978-3-8260-6169-1},
  pages     = {443 -- 460},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{EcksteinSchwarz2012,
  author    = {Eckstein, Lars and Schwarz, Anja},
  title     = {Oceanic modernity : indigeneity, globality and cultural translation},
  isbn      = {978-8-48-489670-8},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{EcksteinSchwarz2019,
  author    = {Eckstein, Lars and Schwarz, Anja},
  title     = {Authors' Response: The Making of Tupaia's Map Revisited},
  series = {The journal of pacific history},
  volume    = {54},
  journal   = {The journal of pacific history},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Routledge},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1469-9605},
  doi       = {10.1080/00223344.2019.1657500},
  pages     = {549 -- 561},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{EcksteinSchwarz2018,
  author    = {Eckstein, Lars and Schwarz, Anja},
  title     = {The Making of Tupaia's Map},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Philosophische Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Philosophische Reihe},
  number    = {154},
  issn      = {1866-8380},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-42309},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-423091},
  pages     = {96},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Tupaia's Map is one of the most famous and enigmatic artefacts to emerge from the early encounters between Europeans and Pacific Islanders. It was drawn by Tupaia, an arioi priest, chiefly advisor and master navigator from Ra'iātea in the Leeward Society Islands in collaboration with various members of the crew of James Cook's Endeavour, in two distinct moments of mapmaking and three draft stages between August 1769 and February 1770. To this day, the identity of many islands on the chart, and the logic of their arrangement have posed a riddle to researchers. Drawing in part on archival material hitherto overlooked, in this long essay we propose a new understanding of the chart's cartographic logic, offer a detailed reconstruction of its genesis, and thus for the first time present a comprehensive reading of Tupaia's Map. The chart not only underscores the extent and mastery of Polynesian navigation, it is also a remarkable feat of translation between two very different wayfinding systems and their respective representational models.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Schwarz2018,
  author    = {Schwarz, Anja},
  title     = {Schomburgk's Chook},
  series = {Postcolonial Studies},
  volume    = {21},
  journal   = {Postcolonial Studies},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {1368-8790},
  doi       = {10.1080/13688790.2018.1434749},
  pages     = {20 -- 34},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Focusing on the politics of museums, collections and the untold stories of the scientific 'specimens' that travelled between Germany and Australia, this article reconstructs the historical, interpersonal and geopolitical contexts that made it possible for the stuffed skin of an Australian malleefowl to become part of the collections of Berlin's Museum f{\"u}r Naturkunde. The author enquires into the kinds of contexts that are habitually considered irrelevant when a specimen of natural history is treated as an object of taxonomic information only. In case of this particular specimen human and non-human history become entangled in ways that link the fate of this one small Australian bird to the German revolutionary generation of 1848, to Germany's nineteenth-century colonial aspirations, to settler-Indigenous relations, to the cruel realities that underpinned the production of scientific knowledge in colonial Australia, and to a present-day interest in reconstructing Indigenous knowledges.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EcksteinSchwarz2019,
  author    = {Eckstein, Lars and Schwarz, Anja},
  title     = {Vision d'une mer faite d'{\^i}les: la carte de Tupaia (1769-1770)},
  series = {Bulletin de la Soci{\´e}t{\´e} des Etudes Oc{\´e}aniennes : Polyn{\´e}sie Orientale},
  volume    = {347},
  journal   = {Bulletin de la Soci{\´e}t{\´e} des Etudes Oc{\´e}aniennes : Polyn{\´e}sie Orientale},
  number    = {Janvier / Avril},
  publisher = {Soc.},
  address   = {Papeete},
  issn      = {0373-8957},
  pages     = {6 -- 23},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {fr}
}
@misc{Schwarz2018,
  author    = {Schwarz, Anja},
  title     = {Schomburgk's Chook},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  number    = {141},
  issn      = {1866-8380},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-412959},
  pages     = {16},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Focusing on the politics of museums, collections and the untold stories of the scientific 'specimens' that travelled between Germany and Australia, this article reconstructs the historical, interpersonal and geopolitical contexts that made it possible for the stuffed skin of an Australian malleefowl to become part of the collections of Berlin's Museum f{\"u}r Naturkunde. The author enquires into the kinds of contexts that are habitually considered irrelevant when a specimen of natural history is treated as an object of taxonomic information only. In case of this particular specimen human and non-human history become entangled in ways that link the fate of this one small Australian bird to the German revolutionary generation of 1848, to Germany's nineteenth-century colonial aspirations, to settler-Indigenous relations, to the cruel realities that underpinned the production of scientific knowledge in colonial Australia, and to a present-day interest in reconstructing Indigenous knowledges.},
  language  = {en}
}