@article{PollatosKurzAlbrechtetal.2008,
  author    = {Pollatos, Olga and Kurz, Anne-Lene and Albrecht, Jessica and Schreder, Tatjana and Kleemann, Anna Maria and Sch{\"o}pf, Veronika and Kopietz, Rainer and Wiesmann, Martin and Schandry, Rainer},
  title     = {Reduced perception of bodily signals in anorexia nervosa},
  issn      = {1471-0153},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {OBJECTIVE: Interoceptive awareness is known to be impaired in eating disorders. To date, it has remained unclear whether this variable is related to the construct of interoceptive sensitivity. Interoceptive sensitivity is considered to be an essential variable in emotional processes. The objective of the study was to elucidate this potential relationship and to clarify whether general interoceptive sensitivity is reduced in anorexia nervosa. METHODS: Using a heartbeat perception task, interoceptive sensitivity was assessed in 28 female patients with anorexia nervosa and 28 matched healthy controls. Questionnaires assessing interoceptive awareness (EDI) and several other variables were also administered. RESULTS: Patients with anorexia nervosa displayed significantly decreased interoceptive sensitivity. They also had more difficulties in interoceptive awareness. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to a decreased ability to recognize certain visceral sensations related to hunger, there is a generally reduced capacity to accurately perceive bodily signals in anorexia nervosa. This highlights the potential importance of interoceptive sensitivity in the pathogenesis of eating disorders.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KleemannKopietzAlbrechtetal.2009,
  author    = {Kleemann, Anna Maria and Kopietz, Rainer and Albrecht, Jessica and Sch{\"o}pf, Veronika and Pollatos, Olga and May, Jana and Linn, Jennifer and Br{\"u}ckmann, Hartmut-Josef and Wiesmann, Martin},
  title     = {Investigation of breathing parameters during odor perception and olfactory imagery},
  issn      = {0379-864X},
  year      = {2009},
  abstract  = {Compared with visual and auditory imagery, little is known about olfactory imagery. There is evidence that respiration may be altered by both olfactory perception and olfactory imagery. In order to investigate this relationship, breathing parameters (respiratory minute volume, respiratory amplitude, and breathing rate) in human subjects during olfactory perception and olfactory imagery were investigated. Fifty-six subjects having normal olfactory function were tested. Nasal respiration was measured using a respiratory pressure sensor. Using an experimental block design, we alternately presented odors or asked the subjects to imagine a given smell. Four different pleasant odors were used: banana, rose, coffee, and lemon odor. We detected a significant increase in respiratory minute volume between olfactory perception and the baseline condition as well as between olfactory imagery and baseline condition. Additionally we found significant differences in the respiratory amplitude between imagery and baseline condition and between odor and imagery condition. Differences in the breathing rate between olfactory perception, olfactory imagery, and baseline were not statistically significant. We conclude from our results that olfactory perception and olfactory imagery both have effects on the human respiratory profile and that these effects are based on a common underlying mechanism.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{AlbrechtAnzingerKopietzetal.2008,
  author    = {Albrecht, Jessica and Anzinger, Andrea and Kopietz, Rainer and Sch{\"o}pf, Veronika and Kleemann, Anna Maria and Pollatos, Olga and Wiesmann, Martin},
  title     = {Test-retest reliability of the olfactory detection threshold test of the Sniffin' Sticks},
  issn      = {0379-864X},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {The aim of the present study was to investigate the test-retest reliability of the olfactory detection threshold subtest of the Sniffin" Sticks test battery, if administered repeatedly on 4 time points. The detection threshold test was repeatedly conducted in 64 healthy subjects. On the first testing session, the threshold test was accomplished 3 times (T(1) = 0 min, T(2) = 35 min, and T(3) = 105 min), representing a short-term testing. A fourth threshold test was conducted on a second testing session (T(4) = 35.1 days after the first testing session), representing a long-term testing. The average scores for olfactory detection threshold for n-butanol did not differ significantly across the 4 points of time. The test-retest reliability (Pearson"s r) between the 4 time points of threshold testing were in a range of 0.43-0.85 (P < 0.01). These results support the notion that the olfactory detection threshold test is a highly reliable method for repeated olfactory testing, even if the test is repeated more than once per day and over a long-term period. It is concluded that the olfactory detection threshold test of the Sniffin" Sticks is suitable for repeated testing during experimental or clinical studies.},
  language  = {en}
}