@article{BreitBrunnerPreckel2020, author = {Breit, Moritz Lion and Brunner, Martin and Preckel, Franzis}, title = {General intelligence and specific cognitive abilities in adolescence}, series = {Developmental psychology}, volume = {56}, journal = {Developmental psychology}, number = {2}, publisher = {American Psychological Association}, address = {Washington}, issn = {0012-1649}, doi = {10.1037/dev0000876}, pages = {364 -- 384}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Differentiation of intelligence refers to changes in the structure of intelligence that depend on individuals' level of general cognitive ability (ability differentiation hypothesis) or age (developmental differentiation hypothesis). The present article aimed to investigate ability differentiation, developmental differentiation, and their interaction with nonlinear factor analytic models in 2 studies. Study 1 was comprised of a nationally representative sample of 7,127 U.S. students (49.4\% female; M-age = 14.51, SD = 1.42, range = 12.08-17.00) who completed the computerized adaptive version of the Armed Service Vocational Aptitude Battery. Study 2 analyzed the norming sample of the Berlin Intelligence Structure Test with 1,506 German students (44\% female; M-age = 14.54, SD = 1.35, range = 10.00-18.42). Results of Study 1 supported the ability differentiation hypothesis but not the developmental differentiation hypothesis. Rather, the findings pointed to age-dedifferentiation (i.e., higher correlations between different abilities with increasing age). There was evidence for an interaction between age and ability differentiation, with greater ability differentiation found for older adolescents. Study 2 provided little evidence for ability differentiation but largely replicated the findings for age dedifferentiation and the interaction between age and ability differentiation. The present results provide insight into the complex dynamics underlying the development of intelligence structure during adolescence. Implications for the assessment of intelligence are discussed.}, language = {en} } @article{SchmidtBrunnerPreckel2018, author = {Schmidt, Isabelle and Brunner, Martin and Preckel, Franzis}, title = {Effects of achievement differences for internal/external frame of reference model investigations}, series = {British journal of educational psychology}, volume = {88}, journal = {British journal of educational psychology}, number = {4}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {0007-0998}, doi = {10.1111/bjep.12198}, pages = {513 -- 528}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Background Achievement in math and achievement in verbal school subjects are more strongly correlated than the respective academic self-concepts. The internal/external frame of reference model (I/E model; Marsh, 1986, Am. Educ. Res. J., 23, 129) explains this finding by social and dimensional comparison processes. We investigated a key assumption of the model that dimensional comparisons mainly depend on the difference in achievement between subjects. We compared correlations between subject-specific self-concepts of groups of elementary and secondary school students with or without achievement differences in the respective subjects. Aims The main goals were (1) to show that effects of dimensional comparisons depend to a large degree on the existence of achievement differences between subjects, (2) to demonstrate the generalizability of findings over different grade levels and self-concept scales, and (3) to test a rarely used correlation comparison approach (CCA) for the investigation of I/E model assumptions. Samples We analysed eight German elementary and secondary school student samples (grades 3-8) from three independent studies (Ns 326-878). Method Correlations between math and German self-concepts of students with identical grades in the respective subjects were compared with the correlation of self-concepts of students having different grades using Fisher's Z test for independent samples. Results In all samples, correlations between math self-concept and German self-concept were higher for students having identical grades than for students having different grades. Differences in median correlations had small effect sizes for elementary school students and moderate effect sizes for secondary school students. Conclusions Findings generalized over grades and indicated a developmental aspect in self-concept formation. The CCA complements investigations within I/E-research.}, language = {en} } @article{VockPreckelRolling2011, author = {Vock, Miriam and Preckel, Franzis and Rolling, Heinz}, title = {Mental abilities and school achievement a test of a mediation hypothesis}, series = {Intelligence}, volume = {39}, journal = {Intelligence}, number = {5}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {New York}, issn = {0160-2896}, doi = {10.1016/j.intell.2011.06.006}, pages = {357 -- 369}, year = {2011}, abstract = {This study analyzes the interplay of four cognitive abilities - reasoning, divergent thinking, mental speed, and short-term memory - and their impact on academic achievement in school in a sample of adolescents in grades seven to 10 (N = 1135). Based on information processing approaches to intelligence, we tested a mediation hypothesis, which states that the complex cognitive abilities of reasoning and divergent thinking mediate the influence of the basic cognitive abilities of mental speed and short-term memory on achievement. We administered a comprehensive test battery and analyzed the data through structural equation modeling while controlling for the cluster structure of the data. Our findings support the notion that mental speed and short-term memory, as ability factors reflecting basic cognitive processes, exert an indirect influence on academic achievement by affecting reasoning and divergent thinking (total indirect effects: beta=.22 and .24. respectively). Short-term memory also directly affects achievement (beta=.22).}, language = {en} } @article{BreitBrunnerPreckel2021, author = {Breit, Moritz Lion and Brunner, Martin and Preckel, Franzis}, title = {Age and ability differentiation in children}, series = {Developmental psychology}, volume = {57}, journal = {Developmental psychology}, number = {3}, publisher = {American Psychological Association}, address = {Richmond, Va. [u.a.]}, issn = {0012-1649}, doi = {10.1037/dev0001147}, pages = {325 -- 346}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Differentiation hypotheses concern changes in the structural organization of cognitive abilities that depend on the level of general intelligence (ability differentiation) or age (developmental differentiation). Part 1 of this article presents a review of the literature on ability and developmental differentiation effects in children, revealing the need for studies that examine both effects simultaneously in this age group with appropriate statistical methods. Part 2 presents an empirical study in which nonlinear factor analytic models were applied to the standardization sample (N = 2,619 German elementary schoolchildren; 48\% female; age: M = 8.8 years, SD = 1.2, range 6-12 years) of the THINK 1-4 intelligence test to investigate ability differentiation, developmental differentiation, and their interaction. The sample was nationally representative regarding age, gender, urbanization, and geographic location of residence but not regarding parents' education and migration background (overrepresentation of children with more educated parents, underrepresentation of children with migration background). The results showed no consistent evidence for the presence of differentiation effects or their interaction. Instead, different patterns were observed for figural, numerical, and verbal reasoning. Implications for the construction of intelligence tests, the assessment of intelligence in children, and for theories of cognitive development are discussed.}, language = {en} } @article{SchmidtBrunnerKelleretal.2017, author = {Schmidt, Isabelle and Brunner, Martin and Keller, Lena and Scherrer, Vsevolod and Wollschlager, Rachel and Baudson, Tanja Gabriele and Preckel, Franzis}, title = {Profile formation of academic self-concept in elementary school students in grades 1 to 4}, series = {PLoS one}, volume = {12}, journal = {PLoS one}, publisher = {PLoS}, address = {San Fransisco}, issn = {1932-6203}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0177854}, pages = {27}, year = {2017}, language = {en} } @article{KellerPreckelBrunner2021, author = {Keller, Lena and Preckel, Franzis and Brunner, Martin}, title = {Nonlinear relations between achievement and academic self-concepts in elementary and secondary school}, series = {Journal of educational psychology / American Psychological Association}, volume = {113}, journal = {Journal of educational psychology / American Psychological Association}, number = {3}, publisher = {American Psychological Association}, address = {Washington}, issn = {0022-0663}, doi = {10.1037/edu0000533}, pages = {585 -- 604}, year = {2021}, abstract = {It is well-documented that academic achievement is associated with students' self-perceptions of their academic abilities, that is, their academic self-concepts. However, low-achieving students may apply self-protective strategies to maintain a favorable academic self-concept when evaluating their academic abilities. Consequently, the relation between achievement and academic self-concept might not be linear across the entire achievement continuum. Capitalizing on representative data from three large-scale assessments (i.e., TIMSS, PIRLS, PISA; N = 470,804), we conducted an integrative data analysis to address nonlinear trends in the relations between achievement and the corresponding self-concepts in mathematics and the verbal domain across 13 countries and 2 age groups (i.e., elementary and secondary school students). Polynomial and interrupted regression analyses showed nonlinear relations in secondary school students, demonstrating that the relations between achievement and the corresponding self-concepts were weaker for lower achieving students than for higher achieving students. Nonlinear effects were also present in younger students, but the pattern of results was rather heterogeneous. We discuss implications for theory as well as for the assessment and interpretation of self-concept.}, language = {en} } @misc{MatheisKellerKronborgetal.2019, author = {Matheis, Svenja and Keller, Lena and Kronborg, Leonie and Schmitt, Manfred and Preckel, Franzis}, title = {Do stereotypes strike twice?}, series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {2}, issn = {1866-8364}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-51370}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-513701}, pages = {22}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Stereotypes influence teachers' perception of and behaviour towards students, thus shaping students' learning opportunities. The present study investigated how 315 Australian pre-service teachers' stereotypes about giftedness and gender are related to their perception of students' intellectual ability, adjustment, and social-emotional ability, using an experimental vignette approach and controlling for social desirability in pre-service teachers' responses. Repeated-measures ANOVA showed that pre-service teachers associated giftedness with higher intellectual ability, but with less adjustment compared to average-ability students. Furthermore, pre-service teachers perceived male students as less socially and emotionally competent and less adjusted than female students. Additionally, pre-service teachers seemed to perceive female average-ability students' adjustment as most favourable compared to male average-ability students and gifted students. Findings point to discrepancies between actual characteristics of gifted female and male students and stereotypes in teachers' beliefs. Consequences of stereotyping and implications for teacher education are discussed.}, language = {en} } @article{MatheisKellerKronborgetal.2019, author = {Matheis, Svenja and Keller, Lena and Kronborg, Leonie and Schmitt, Manfred and Preckel, Franzis}, title = {Do stereotypes strike twice?}, series = {Asia-Pacific journal of teacher education}, volume = {48}, journal = {Asia-Pacific journal of teacher education}, number = {2}, publisher = {Routledge Journals, Taylor \& Francis}, address = {Abingdon}, issn = {1469-2945}, doi = {10.1080/1359866X.2019.1576029}, pages = {213 -- 232}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Stereotypes influence teachers' perception of and behaviour towards students, thus shaping students' learning opportunities. The present study investigated how 315 Australian pre-service teachers' stereotypes about giftedness and gender are related to their perception of students' intellectual ability, adjustment, and social-emotional ability, using an experimental vignette approach and controlling for social desirability in pre-service teachers' responses. Repeated-measures ANOVA showed that pre-service teachers associated giftedness with higher intellectual ability, but with less adjustment compared to average-ability students. Furthermore, pre-service teachers perceived male students as less socially and emotionally competent and less adjusted than female students. Additionally, pre-service teachers seemed to perceive female average-ability students' adjustment as most favourable compared to male average-ability students and gifted students. Findings point to discrepancies between actual characteristics of gifted female and male students and stereotypes in teachers' beliefs. Consequences of stereotyping and implications for teacher education are discussed.}, language = {en} } @article{BrunnerKellerStallaschetal.2022, author = {Brunner, Martin and Keller, Lena and Stallasch, Sophie E. and Kretschmann, Julia and Hasl, Andrea and Preckel, Franzis and Luedtke, Oliver and Hedges, Larry}, title = {Meta-analyzing individual participant data from studies with complex survey designs}, series = {Research synthesis methods}, volume = {14}, journal = {Research synthesis methods}, number = {1}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {1759-2879}, doi = {10.1002/jrsm.1584}, pages = {5 -- 35}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Descriptive analyses of socially important or theoretically interesting phenomena and trends are a vital component of research in the behavioral, social, economic, and health sciences. Such analyses yield reliable results when using representative individual participant data (IPD) from studies with complex survey designs, including educational large-scale assessments (ELSAs) or social, health, and economic survey and panel studies. The meta-analytic integration of these results offers unique and novel research opportunities to provide strong empirical evidence of the consistency and generalizability of important phenomena and trends. Using ELSAs as an example, this tutorial offers methodological guidance on how to use the two-stage approach to IPD meta-analysis to account for the statistical challenges of complex survey designs (e.g., sampling weights, clustered and missing IPD), first, to conduct descriptive analyses (Stage 1), and second, to integrate results with three-level meta-analytic and meta-regression models to take into account dependencies among effect sizes (Stage 2). The two-stage approach is illustrated with IPD on reading achievement from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). We demonstrate how to analyze and integrate standardized mean differences (e.g., gender differences), correlations (e.g., with students' socioeconomic status [SES]), and interactions between individual characteristics at the participant level (e.g., the interaction between gender and SES) across several PISA cycles. All the datafiles and R scripts we used are available online. Because complex social, health, or economic survey and panel studies share many methodological features with ELSAs, the guidance offered in this tutorial is also helpful for synthesizing research evidence from these studies.}, language = {en} }