@article{ColangeliSchlaegelOberteggeretal.2019,
  author    = {Colangeli, Pierluigi and Schl{\"a}gel, Ulrike E. and Obertegger, Ulrike and Petermann, Jana S. and Tiedemann, Ralph and Weithoff, Guntram},
  title     = {Negative phototactic response to UVR in three cosmopolitan rotifers: a video analysis approach},
  series = {Hydrobiologia : acta hydrobiologica, hydrographica, limnologica et protistologica},
  volume    = {844},
  journal   = {Hydrobiologia : acta hydrobiologica, hydrographica, limnologica et protistologica},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Dordrecht},
  issn      = {0018-8158},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10750-018-3801-y},
  pages     = {43 -- 54},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BukowskiSchittkoPetermann2018,
  author    = {Bukowski, Alexandra R. and Schittko, Conrad and Petermann, Jana S.},
  title     = {The strength of negative plant-soil feedback increases from the intraspecific to the interspecific and the functional group level},
  series = {Ecology and evolution},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Ecology and evolution},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {2045-7758},
  doi       = {10.1002/ece3.3755},
  pages     = {2280 -- 2289},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {One of the processes that may play a key role in plant species coexistence and ecosystem functioning is plant-soil feedback, the effect of plants on associated soil communities and the resulting feedback on plant performance. Plant-soil feedback at the interspecific level (comparing growth on own soil with growth on soil from different species) has been studied extensively, while plant-soil feedback at the intraspecific level (comparing growth on own soil with growth on soil from different accessions within a species) has only recently gained attention. Very few studies have investigated the direction and strength of feedback among different taxonomic levels, and initial results have been inconclusive, discussing phylogeny, and morphology as possible determinants. To test our hypotheses that the strength of negative feedback on plant performance increases with increasing taxonomic level and that this relationship is explained by morphological similarities, we conducted a greenhouse experiment using species assigned to three taxonomic levels (intraspecific, interspecific, and functional group level). We measured certain fitness-related aboveground traits and used them along literature-derived traits to determine the influence of morphological similarities on the strength and direction of the feedback. We found that the average strength of negative feedback increased from the intraspecific over the interspecific to the functional group level. However, individual accessions and species differed in the direction and strength of the feedback. None of our results could be explained by morphological dissimilarities or individual traits. Synthesis. Our results indicate that negative plant-soil feedback is stronger if the involved plants belong to more distantly related species. We conclude that the taxonomic level is an important factor in the maintenance of plant coexistence with plant-soil feedback as a potential stabilizing mechanism and should be addressed explicitly in coexistence research, while the traits considered here seem to play a minor role.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{BukowskiSchittkoPetermann2018,
  author    = {Bukowski, Alexandra R. and Schittko, Conrad and Petermann, Jana S.},
  title     = {The strength of negative plant-soil feedback increases from the intraspecific to the interspecific and the functional group level},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {618},
  issn      = {1866-8372},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-42383},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-423833},
  pages     = {10},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {One of the processes that may play a key role in plant species coexistence and ecosystem functioning is plant-soil feedback, the effect of plants on associated soil communities and the resulting feedback on plant performance. Plant-soil feedback at the interspecific level (comparing growth on own soil with growth on soil from different species) has been studied extensively, while plant-soil feedback at the intraspecific level (comparing growth on own soil with growth on soil from different accessions within a species) has only recently gained attention. Very few studies have investigated the direction and strength of feedback among different taxonomic levels, and initial results have been inconclusive, discussing phylogeny, and morphology as possible determinants. To test our hypotheses that the strength of negative feedback on plant performance increases with increasing taxonomic level and that this relationship is explained by morphological similarities, we conducted a greenhouse experiment using species assigned to three taxonomic levels (intraspecific, interspecific, and functional group level). We measured certain fitness-related aboveground traits and used them along literature-derived traits to determine the influence of morphological similarities on the strength and direction of the feedback. We found that the average strength of negative feedback increased from the intraspecific over the interspecific to the functional group level. However, individual accessions and species differed in the direction and strength of the feedback. None of our results could be explained by morphological dissimilarities or individual traits. Synthesis. Our results indicate that negative plant-soil feedback is stronger if the involved plants belong to more distantly related species. We conclude that the taxonomic level is an important factor in the maintenance of plant coexistence with plant-soil feedback as a potential stabilizing mechanism and should be addressed explicitly in coexistence research, while the traits considered here seem to play a minor role.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HegerBernardVerdierGessleretal.2019,
  author    = {Heger, Tina and Bernard-Verdier, Maud and Gessler, Arthur and Greenwood, Alex D. and Grossart, Hans-Peter and Hilker, Monika and Keinath, Silvia and Kowarik, Ingo and K{\"u}ffer, Christoph and Marquard, Elisabeth and Mueller, Johannes and Niemeier, Stephanie and Onandia, Gabriela and Petermann, Jana S. and Rillig, Matthias C. and Rodel, Mark-Oliver and Saul, Wolf-Christian and Schittko, Conrad and Tockner, Klement and Joshi, Jasmin Radha and Jeschke, Jonathan M.},
  title     = {Towards an Integrative, Eco-Evolutionary Understanding of Ecological Novelty: Studying and Communicating Interlinked Effects of Global Change},
  series = {Bioscience},
  volume    = {69},
  journal   = {Bioscience},
  number    = {11},
  publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0006-3568},
  doi       = {10.1093/biosci/biz095},
  pages     = {888 -- 899},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Global change has complex eco-evolutionary consequences for organisms and ecosystems, but related concepts (e.g., novel ecosystems) do not cover their full range. Here we propose an umbrella concept of "ecological novelty" comprising (1) a site-specific and (2) an organism-centered, eco-evolutionary perspective. Under this umbrella, complementary options for studying and communicating effects of global change on organisms, ecosystems, and landscapes can be included in a toolbox. This allows researchers to address ecological novelty from different perspectives, e.g., by defining it based on (a) categorical or continuous measures, (b) reference conditions related to sites or organisms, and (c) types of human activities. We suggest striving for a descriptive, non-normative usage of the term "ecological novelty" in science. Normative evaluations and decisions about conservation policies or management are important, but require additional societal processes and engagement with multiple stakeholders.},
  language  = {en}
}