@article{LewandowskyStritzkeOberaueretal.2004, author = {Lewandowsky, Stephan and Stritzke, W. g. k. and Oberauer, Klaus and Morales, M.}, title = {Memory for fact, fiction, and misinformation : the Iraq War 2003}, issn = {0020-7594}, year = {2004}, language = {en} } @article{OberauerSussWilhelmetal.2004, author = {Oberauer, Klaus and Suss, H. M. and Wilhelm, Oliver and Wittman, W. W.}, title = {The multiple faces of working memory : storage, processing, supervision, and coordination}, issn = {0160-2896}, year = {2004}, language = {en} } @article{OberauerSussWilhelmetal.2004, author = {Oberauer, Klaus and Suss, H. M. and Wilhelm, Oliver and Wittman, W. W.}, title = {The multiple faces of working memory : Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination}, issn = {0160-2896}, year = {2004}, language = {en} } @article{OberauerWeidenfeldHornig2004, author = {Oberauer, Klaus and Weidenfeld, Andrea and Hornig, R.}, title = {Logical reasoning and probabilities: A comprehensive test of Oaksford and Chater (2001)}, issn = {1069-9384}, year = {2004}, abstract = {We report two experiments testing a central prediction of the probabilistic account of reasoning provided by Oaksford and Chater (2001): Acceptance of standard conditional inferences, card choices in the Wason selection task, and quantifiers chosen for conclusions from syllogisms should vary as a function of the frequency of the concepts involved. Frequency was manipulated by a probability-learning phase preceding the reasoning tasks to simulate natural sampling. The effects predicted by Oaksford and Chater (2001) were not obtained with any of the three paradigms}, language = {en} } @article{Oberauer2004, author = {Oberauer, Klaus}, title = {Simultaneous execution of two cognitive operations : Evidence from a continuous updating paradigm}, year = {2004}, language = {en} } @article{OberauerKliegl2004, author = {Oberauer, Klaus and Kliegl, Reinhold}, title = {Simultaneous cognitive operations in working memory after dual-task practice}, issn = {0096-1523}, year = {2004}, abstract = {The authors tested the hypothesis that with adequate practice, people can execute 2 cognitive operations in working memory simultaneously. In Experiment 1, 6 students practiced updating 2 items in working memory through 2 sequences of operations (1 numerical, 1 spatial). In different blocks, imperative stimuli for the 2 sequences of operations were presented either simultaneously or sequentially. Initially, most participants experienced substantial dual-task costs. After 24 sessions of practice, operation latencies for simultaneous presentation were equal to the maximum of times for the 2 operations in the sequential condition, suggesting perfect timesharing. Experiment 2 showed that a reduction of dual-task costs requires practice on the combination of the 2 updating tasks, not just practice on each individual task. Hence, the reduction of dual-task costs cannot be explained by shortening or automatization of individual operations}, language = {en} }