@article{DavydchykMehlhausenPriesmeyerTkocz2017,
  author    = {Davydchyk, Maria and Mehlhausen, Thomas and Priesmeyer-Tkocz, Weronika},
  title     = {The price of success, the benefit of setbacks},
  series = {Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies},
  volume    = {97},
  journal   = {Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0016-3287},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.futures.2017.06.004},
  pages     = {35 -- 46},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {This article explores the various futures of relations between the European Union (EU) and Ukraine. After distilling two major drivers we construct a future compass in order to conceive of four futures of relations between the EU and Ukraine. Our scenarios aim to challenge deep-rooted assumptions on the EU's neighbourhood with Ukraine: How will the politico-economic challenges in the European countries influence the EU's approach towards the East? Will more EU engagement in Ukraine contribute to enduring peace? Does peace always come with stability? Which prospects does the idea of Intermarium have? Are the pivotal transformation players in Ukraine indeed oligarchs or rather small- and medium-sized entrepreneurs? After presenting our scenarios, we propose indicators to know in the years to come, along which path future relations do develop. By unearthing surprising developments we hope to provoke innovative thoughts on Eastern Europe in times of post truth societies, confrontation between states and hybrid warfare.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Mehlhausen2010,
  author    = {Mehlhausen, Thomas},
  title     = {Die Osterweiterung der Europ{\"a}ischen Union},
  series = {WeltTrends-Papiere},
  journal   = {WeltTrends-Papiere},
  number    = {15},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1864-0656},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-63005},
  pages     = {145 -- 162},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {Inhalt: Die Osterweiterung der Europ{\"a}ischen Union - Die anomischen Konsequenzen der deutschen Wiedervereinigung Die theoretische Debatte {\"u}ber die Osterweiterung der Europ{\"a}ischen Union Deutsche Wiedervereinigung und europ{\"a}ische Integration Schwach sozialisierte Akteure in diffusen Entscheidungskontexten Diffuse Entscheidungskontexte und die Osterweiterung der Europ{\"a}ischen Union Schlussfolgerungen Literatur},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KlegerMehlhausen2013,
  author    = {Kleger, Heinz and Mehlhausen, Thomas},
  title     = {Indisputable and still disputed - European solidarity during the Euro crisis},
  series = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Vereinigung f{\"u}r Politische Wissenschaft},
  volume    = {54},
  journal   = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Vereinigung f{\"u}r Politische Wissenschaft},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Hannover},
  issn      = {0032-3470},
  pages     = {50 -- 74},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {The term solidarity is lacking a precise definition despite being embedded as primary law in the EU treaties and regardless of its pivotal role in the current debate on the euro crisis. Once the semantic core is unearthed we sketch three dimensions of European solidarity (motives, references, level of action). Through this we shall distil three ideal types of an intergovernmental European solidarity: a federal, an organic and a distributive type. Empirically we assign the most relevant measures, which were discussed and partially enacted in the course of the euro crisis, to the three ideal types where we identify an increasing tendency towards a distributive solidarity. Once the first elements will be upgraded to a full-blown distributive solidarity through further integration, several risks arise from a normative perspective.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KarolewskiMehlhausenSus2015,
  author    = {Karolewski, Ireneusz Pawel and Mehlhausen, Thomas and Sus, Monika},
  title     = {The Polish EU Council Presidency in 2011: Master or Servant?},
  series = {Journal of European integration},
  volume    = {37},
  journal   = {Journal of European integration},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {0703-6337},
  doi       = {10.1080/07036337.2015.1053085},
  pages     = {667 -- 684},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {The point of departure of this article is limited systematic research on the rotating EU Council Presidency after the Lisbon Treaty. In order to assess rotating presidencies the paper proposes a three-tier approach which includes a functional, a behavioural and a contingency dimension. These dimensions are supplemented by the institutional changes of the Lisbon Treaty referring to the rotating presidencies. Next, the paper applies this evaluation framework to the Polish Presidency that took place in the second half of 2011. Finally, it draws conclusions from the Polish case for both the leadership capacity of the rotating Council Presidency in the post-Lisbon European Union and the performance of Poland's EU Council Presidency.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MehlhausenKarolewski2013,
  author    = {Mehlhausen, Thomas and Karolewski, Ireneusz Pawel},
  title     = {Die polnische EU-Ratspr{\"a}sidentenschaft: Evaluations- und Analysekriterien},
  isbn      = {978-3-8329-7492-3},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}