@book{KrauskopfRoggeSalzbergLudwigetal.2019, author = {Krauskopf, Karsten and Rogge, Franziska and Salzberg-Ludwig, Karin and Knigge, Michel}, title = {F{\"o}rderplanung im Team f{\"u}r die Sekundarstufe (FiT-S)}, publisher = {Reinhardt}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {978-3-497-02889-4}, pages = {124}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{KrauskopfFoulgerWilliams2018, author = {Krauskopf, Karsten and Foulger, Teresa S. and Williams, Mia Kim}, title = {Prompting teachers' reflection of their professional knowledge}, series = {Teacher Development}, volume = {22}, journal = {Teacher Development}, number = {2}, publisher = {Routledge}, address = {Abingdon}, issn = {1366-4530}, doi = {10.1080/13664530.2017.1367717}, pages = {153 -- 174}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Many educational technology proponents support the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) model as a way to conceptualize teaching with technology, but recent TPACK research shows a need for empirical studies regarding the development of this knowledge. This proof-of-concept study applies mixed-methods to investigate the meta-cognitive awareness produced by teachers who participate in the Graphic Assessment of TPACK Instrument (GATI). This process involves creating graphical representations (circles of differing sizes and the degree of their overlap) that represent what teachers understand to be their current and aspired TPACK. This study documented teachers' explanations during a think-aloud procedure as they created their GATI figures. The in-depth data from two German teachers who participated in the process captured the details of their experience and demonstrated the potential of the GATI to support teachers in reflecting about their professional knowledge and in determining their own professional development activities. These findings will be informative to future pilot studies involving the larger design of the GATI process, to better understand the role of teachers' meta-conceptual awareness, and to better ascertain how the GATI might be used to support professional development on a larger scale.}, language = {en} } @article{KrauskopfForssell2018, author = {Krauskopf, Karsten and Forssell, Karin}, title = {When knowing is believing}, series = {Journal of Computer Assisted Learning}, volume = {34}, journal = {Journal of Computer Assisted Learning}, number = {5}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {0266-4909}, doi = {10.1111/jcal.12253}, pages = {482 -- 491}, year = {2018}, abstract = {In an effort to understand teachers' technology use, recent scholarship has explored the idea of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK or TPACK). Many studies have used self-reports to measure this knowledge (SR TPCK). Several studies have examined the construct validity of these assessments by analysing the internal relationships of the knowledge domains, but little attention has been paid to how SR TPCK relates to external criteria. We tackled this question of discriminant validity by reanalysing 2 data sets. We used correlation and multiple regression analyses to explore whether conceptually related constructs explain any variance in participants' SR TPCK. In Study 1, we applied this strategy to German pre-service teachers using technology use, attitudinal variables, and objective measures of teachers' knowledge of technology and pedagogy as external criteria. In Study 2, we examined measures of technology knowledge, experience, and pro-technology beliefs for in-service teachers in the United States. Across both studies, a sizeable amount of the variance in SR TPCK is explained by teachers' prior technology use and pro-technology attitudes. In contrast, fact-based tests of technology and pedagogy are distinct from SR TPCK. We discuss implications for these findings and argue that researchers should gather complementary measures in concert.}, language = {en} } @book{JennekRotherToschetal.2022, author = {Jennek, Julia and Rother, Stefanie and Tosch, Frank and Wendland, Mirko and Kludt, Steffen and Krauskopf, Karsten and Kitschke, Dorothea and Maar, Verena and Knigge, Michel and Gn{\"a}dig, Susanne and Seidel, Astrid and Siehr, Karl-Heinz and Wienecke, Maik and G{\"u}nther, Claudia-Susanne and Reitz-Koncebovski, Karen and KloĢˆpping, Peter M. and K{\"u}choll, Denise and Lazarides, Rebecca and Westphal, Andrea and Scherreiks, Lynn and Kuhr, Linda and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Gronostaj, Anna and Vock, Miriam and Zaruba, Nicole and Ahlgrimm, Frederik and Link, J{\"o}rg-Werner and K{\"o}rner, Dorothea and Barseghyan, Anahit and Glowinski, Ingrid}, title = {Professionalisierung in Praxisphasen}, series = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung}, journal = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung}, number = {2}, editor = {Jennek, Julia}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-508-8}, issn = {2626-3556}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-50096}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-500964}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {321}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Schulpraktika bilden die zentrale Grundlage der Lehrerbildung in Potsdam. Bereits im Potsdamer Modell der Lehrerbildung (1993) sind sie festgehalten, seit der Integration des Schulpraktikums (Praxissemesters) 2008 absolvieren alle Potsdamer Lehramtsstudierenden f{\"u}nf Pflichtpraktika. W{\"a}hrend die Ziele der Praktika klar beschrieben sind, sind die tats{\"a}chlichen Lernerfolge nicht immer klar - ebenso wenig, wie die Begleitung der Praktika aussehen muss, um die Studierenden bestm{\"o}glich zu unterst{\"u}tzen. Auch die Integration in weitere Lehrveranstaltungen des Studiums ist ein noch offenes Feld, das weiterer Betrachtung verdient. Die unterschiedliche Ausrichtung der Potsdamer Praktika, Perspektivwechsel im Orientierungs-/Integriertem Eingangspraktikum, Selbstreflektion im Praktikum in p{\"a}dagogisch-psychologischen Handlungsfeldern, Unterricht als Profession in den Fachdidaktischen Tagespraktika, Anwendung von Diagnostik im psychodiagnostischen Praktikum und die Synthese all dessen im Schulpraktikum, bieten daf{\"u}r zahlreiche Ansatzpunkte. Schulpraktika sind nicht nur ein zentraler und von Studierenden hoch gesch{\"a}tzter Bestandteil des Studiums, sondern werden auch zunehmend f{\"u}r die Bildungsforschung interessant. Fragen nach der Kompetenzentwicklung, Selbsteinsch{\"a}tzungen und der Entwicklung der Reflexionsf{\"a}higkeit von Studierenden stehen dabei ebenso im Fokus wie die Einsch{\"a}tzung der universit{\"a}ren Begleitung und der Einbindung ins weitere Studium. Der vorliegende Band versammelt Studien von Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam, die die f{\"u}nf Pflichtpraktika im Lehramtsstudium unter unterschiedlichen Blickwinkel beforschen. Besonders hervorzuheben ist, dass die Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler aus unterschiedlichen Disziplinen stammen und somit die Praktika mit verschiedenen Instrumenten und aus unterschiedlichen Blickwinkeln betrachten. Die pr{\"a}sentierten Ergebnisse bilden eine gute Grundlage, um die Praktika in Potsdam und an anderen Standorten weiterzuentwickeln.}, language = {de} }