@article{Krueger2019,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {How is the Human Life-Form of Mind Really Possible in Nature?},
  series = {Human studies},
  volume    = {42},
  journal   = {Human studies},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Dordrecht},
  issn      = {0163-8548},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10746-017-9429-5},
  pages     = {47 -- 64},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {J. Dewey and H. Plessner both and independently of one another treated the central question of what new task philosophy must set itself if the assumption is correct that the life-form of mind, i.e., the mental life-form of humans, arose in nature and must also sustain itself in the future within nature. If nature has to reconceived so as to make the irreducible qualities of life and mind truly possible, then it can no longer be restricted to the role of physical material. Conversely humans cannot no longer take on the role of God outside and independent of nature. Instead these philosophers distinguish between three plateaus (Dewey) or stages (Plessner), between physical (inorganic) nature, psycho-physical (living) nature and the nature that is mental life. This distinction is drawn such that a connection between the plateaus is truly possible. The third level, that of the mental form of life, answers mentally within conduct to the break with the first two levels. Hence it depends in the future as well on the continuously renewed difference (between the precarious and the stable for Dewey, between immediacy and mediation for Plessner) in our experience of nature. Within this difference nature as a whole remains an open unknown, which is why we can credit Dewey with a philosophy of diversified and negative holism, Plessner with a differential philosophy of the negativity of the absolute.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Krueger2020,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Closed environment and open world},
  series = {Jakob von Uexk{\"u}ll and philosophy: life, environments, anthropology},
  booktitle = {Jakob von Uexk{\"u}ll and philosophy: life, environments, anthropology},
  publisher = {Routledge},
  address   = {London},
  isbn      = {978-0-429-27909-6},
  doi       = {10.4324/9780429279096},
  pages     = {89 -- 105},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {According to Plessner, both adaptation and selection can be conceived not just as requested by the environment but also as actively proceeding from the organism. In this respect, Plessner finds in Uexk{\"u}ll's new biology a powerful counterweight to the constraints of Darwinism. However, despite all the points in common in their respective understanding of the problem, Plessner reproaches to Uexk{\"u}ll to have entirely missed the intermediate layer of the lived body [Leib] between the organism and its environment. Unlike Uexk{\"u}ll, concerning the more developed animals, Plessner took up elements of animal psychology from Wolfgang K{\"o}hler and Frederik Jacobus Johannes Buytendijk. Finally, Plessner finds insufficiencies also in Uexk{\"u}ll's distinction between the notion of world and the notion of environment, which would lead to the parallel positing of different environments. In reaction to Uexk{\"u}ll's leveling of all environments, Plessner drafted a philosophical-anthropological spectrum between the intelligent way of living observed in the great apes, whose intelligence had been demonstrated, and the co-wordly life of the symbolic mind as seen in the personal sphere of human life.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Krueger2004,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Brain in the context of eccentric positioning : philosophical challenges to neurobiological brain research},
  year      = {2004},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Krueger2004,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {The abandonment of living nature as its historical goal},
  year      = {2004},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Krueger2004,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {The public nature of human beings : parallels between classical pragmatism and Helmuth Plessner's philosophical anthropology},
  issn      = {0015-1831},
  year      = {2004},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Krueger2003,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {La natura pubblica degli esseri umani : un confronto il pragmatismo classico},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {es}
}
@article{Krueger2003,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Amira, Mehmet et leur enfants : sur l'opposition concr{\`e}te entre droits de l'homme et droits du citoyen},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {fr}
}
@article{Krueger2003,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Die Grenzen der positiven Bestimmung des Menschen : der homo absconditus},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KruegerHenrichIrrlitz2003,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter and Henrich, D. and Irrlitz, G.},
  title     = {German-language philosophy 1949-1989 and in the future : an interview with Dieter Henrich and Gerd Irrlitz},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Krueger2019,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Social Presentation Scheme of the Modern Age and the Specter of Idealism},
  series = {Charles Taylor: Ein s{\"a}kulares Zeitalter},
  journal   = {Charles Taylor: Ein s{\"a}kulares Zeitalter},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-11-040948-2},
  issn      = {2192-4554},
  doi       = {10.1515/9783110409482-006},
  pages     = {59 -- 76},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger1996,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Angst vor der Selbstentsicherung : zum gegenw{\"a}rtigen Streit um Helmuth Plessners philosophische Anthropologie},
  year      = {1996},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger1996,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Die Leere zwischen Sein und Sinn : Helmuth Plessners Heidegger-Kritik in "Macht und menschliche Natur" (1931)},
  year      = {1996},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger1996,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Philosophische Anthropologie : ein Pl{\"a}doyer f{\"u}r die erneute Lekt{\"u}re Helmuth Plessners},
  year      = {1996},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HarthHasslerKostaetal.2008,
  author    = {Harth, Helene and Haßler, Gerda and Kosta, Peter and Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter and Tristram, Hildegard L. C. and Wegener, Heide and Stehl, Thomas},
  title     = {Laudation zur Verleihung des Doktogrades ehrenhalber an Herrn Prof. em. Dr. phil. Helmut L{\"u}dke},
  isbn      = {978-3- 8233-6362-0},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{Krueger2009,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Philosophische Anthropologie als Lebenspolitik : deutsch-j{\"u}dische und pragmatistische Modernekritik},
  series = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Philosophie : Sonderband},
  volume    = {23},
  journal   = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Philosophie : Sonderband},
  publisher = {Akad.-Verl.},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-05-004605-1},
  pages     = {371 S.},
  year      = {2009},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Krueger1994,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Interwiew mit Adolf Gr{\"u}nbaum : Atheismus, Induktivismus und Freud oder die Vertreibung eines K{\"o}lschen Jungen},
  year      = {1994},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Krueger1994,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Interview mit Nicolas Rescher: Pragmatischer Idealismus oder idealistischer Pragmatismus?},
  year      = {1994},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger1994,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Rationaler Pluralismus : zu Reschers Habermas-Kritik},
  year      = {1994},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger1998,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {The second nature of human beings : an invitation for John McDowell to discuss Helmuth Plessner's philosophical anthropology ; with a comment on Hans-Peter Kr{\"u}ger's paper by John McDowell, p. 120-125},
  year      = {1998},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Krueger1998,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Das Nirgendwo im Dasein : Joachim Fests Utopieverbot und Inge M{\"u}nz-Koenens Diskursanalyse utopischen Denkens},
  year      = {1998},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger1998,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Die Souver{\"a}nit{\"a}t pragmatischer Skepsis : Versuch auf Albert D. Hirschmans selbstkritische Bilanz},
  year      = {1998},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{Krueger1992,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Demission der Helden : Kritiken von innen 1983-1992},
  series = {Aufbau-Taschenbuch : Dokument und Essay},
  volume    = {170},
  journal   = {Aufbau-Taschenbuch : Dokument und Essay},
  publisher = {Aufbau-Taschenbuch-Verl.},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {3-7466-0175-4},
  pages     = {246 S.},
  year      = {1992},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{Krueger1993,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Perspektivenwechsel : Autopoiese, Moderne und Postmoderne im kommunikationsorientierten Vergleich},
  publisher = {Akad.-Verl.},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {3-05-001946-8},
  pages     = {276 S.},
  year      = {1993},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{Krueger1999,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Das Spektrum menschlicher Ph{\"a}nomene},
  series = {Zwischen Lachen und Weinen},
  volume    = {1},
  journal   = {Zwischen Lachen und Weinen},
  publisher = {Akademie Verl.},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {3-05-003414-9},
  pages     = {422 S.},
  year      = {1999},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{Krueger2001,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Der dritte Weg philosophischer Anthropologie und die Geschlechterfrage},
  series = {Zwischen Lachen und Weinen},
  volume    = {2},
  journal   = {Zwischen Lachen und Weinen},
  publisher = {Akademie Verl.},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {3-05-0035-15-3},
  pages     = {371 S.},
  year      = {2001},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{Krueger2010,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Gehirn, Verhalten und Zeit : philosophische Anthropologie als Forschungsrahmen},
  series = {Philosophische Anthropologie},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Philosophische Anthropologie},
  publisher = {Akad.-Verl.},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-05-004480-4},
  pages     = {300 S.},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger1994,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Nachruf: Zum Tode des Philosophen Lorenz Kr{\"u}ger},
  year      = {1994},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Krueger2015,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Life-Philosophical Anthropology as the Missing Third: On Peter Gordon's Continental Divide},
  series = {History of European ideas},
  volume    = {41},
  journal   = {History of European ideas},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {0191-6599},
  doi       = {10.1080/01916599.2014.981019},
  pages     = {432 -- 439},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Though Peter Gordon mentioned philosophical anthropology in his book Continental Divide, he has not yet realized how it works independently from Cassirer's and Heidegger's prejudices. The whole argument between them before, in and after Davos (1929) raged around the status of philosophical anthropology: How do the spiritualisation of life and the enlivening of the spirit come about? This was not just the central question for philosophical anthropology founded by Max Scheler, but also in Wilhelm Dilthey's life philosophy, which was systematized by Georg Misch. Cassirer and Heidegger shared three shortcomings with respect to the Life-philosophical Anthropology. Neither had a philosophy of nature or a philosophy of sociaty or a philosophy of history. The insight into the unfathomability of humans (Misch) is given a political edge in Helmuth Plessner's book Power and Human Nature (1931). Elevating it to the principle of democratic equality with respect to the worth of all cultures one opens up the potential for a form of civil competition that might supersede ethnocentric wars.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Krueger2011,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {The body-body-difference of persons eccentric positionality and homo absconditus},
  series = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  volume    = {59},
  journal   = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0012-1045},
  pages     = {577 -- 589},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{DemmerlingKruegerHabermas2016,
  author    = {Demmerling, Christoph and Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter and Habermas, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {Communicative Reason Juergen Habermas, interviewed by Christoph Demmerling and Hans-Peter Krueger},
  series = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  volume    = {64},
  journal   = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0012-1045},
  doi       = {10.1515/dzph-2016-0061},
  pages     = {806 -- 827},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Jurgen Habermas explicates the concept of communicative reason. He explains the key assumptions of the philosophy of language and social theory associated with this concept. Also discussed is the category of life-world and the role of the body-mind difference for the consciousness of exclusivity in our access to subjective experience. as well as the role of emotions and perceptions in the context of a theory of communicative action. The question of the redemption of the various validity claims as they are associated with the performance of speech acts is related to processes of social learning and to the role of negative experiences. Finally the interview deals with the relationship between religion and reason and the importance of religion in modern, post-secular societies. Questions about the philosophical culture of our present times are discussed at the end of the conversation.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger2016,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Critical Anthropology? To the Relationship between Philosophical Anthropology and Critical Theory},
  series = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  volume    = {64},
  journal   = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0012-1045},
  doi       = {10.1515/dzph-2016-0041},
  pages     = {553 -- 580},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {This article compares Max Horkheimer's and Theodor W. Adorno's foundation of the Frankfurt Critical Theory with Helmuth Plessner's foundation of Philosophical Anthropology. While Horkheimer's and Plessner's paradigms are mutually incompatible, Adorno's „negative dialectics" and Plessner's „negative anthropology" (G. Gamm) can be seen as complementing one another. J{\"u}rgen Habermas at one point sketched a complementary relationship between his own publicly communicative theory of modern society and Plessner's philosophy of nature and human expressivity, and though he then came to doubt this, he later reaffirmed it. Faced with the „life power" in „high capitalism" (Plessner), the ambitions for a public democracy in a pluralistic society have to be broadened from an argumentative focus (Habermas) to include the human condition and the expressive modes of our experience as essentially embodied persons. The article discusses some possible aspects of this complementarity under the title of a „critical anthropology" (H. Schn{\"a}delbach).},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Krueger2016,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Kritische Anthropologie?},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  number    = {127},
  issn      = {1866-8380},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-398024},
  pages     = {28},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {This article compares Max Horkheimer's and Theodor W. Adorno's foundation of the Frankfurt Critical Theory with Helmuth Plessner's foundation of Philosophical Anthropology. While Horkheimer's and Plessner's paradigms are mutually incompatible, Adorno's „negative dialectics" and Plessner's „negative anthropology" (G. Gamm) can be seen as complementing one another. J{\"u}rgen Habermas at one point sketched a complementary relationship between his own publicly communicative theory of modern society and Plessner's philosophy of nature and human expressivity, and though he then came to doubt this, he later reaffirmed it. Faced with the „life power" in „high capitalism" (Plessner), the ambitions for a public democracy in a pluralistic society have to be broadened from an argumentative focus (Habermas) to include the human condition and the expressive modes of our experience as essentially embodied persons. The article discusses some possible aspects of this complementarity under the title of a „critical anthropology" (H. Schn{\"a}delbach)},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger2001,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Die Semiosis lebendiger Augenblicke : die pragmatische Transformation der Hegelschen Unterscheidung zwischen Substanz und Subjekt durch W. James und Ch. S. Pierce},
  year      = {2001},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger2001,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Die Grenzen der Materialisierung diskursiver Performativit{\"a}t an psychisch lebbarer Sozialit{\"a}t : Judith Butlers unbekannte Wiederentdeckung der Unumg{\"a}nglichkeit Philosophischer Anthropologie},
  year      = {2001},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger2001,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Das Intellektuelle : seine Befreiung durch seine Selbstbejahung in einer gewaltenteiligen Moderne},
  isbn      = {3-935693-18-4},
  year      = {2001},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger2001,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Die Semiosis lebendiger Augenblicke : die pragmatische Transformation der Hegelschen Unterscheidung zwischen Substanz und Subjekt durch W. James und Ch. S. Pierce},
  isbn      = {3-89785-137-7},
  year      = {2001},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{Krueger2001,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Der dritte Weg philosophischer Anthropologie und die Geschlechterfrage},
  series = {Zwischen Lachen und Weinen},
  volume    = {2},
  journal   = {Zwischen Lachen und Weinen},
  publisher = {de Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {3-05-003515-3},
  doi       = {10.1524/9783050078335},
  pages     = {422 S.},
  year      = {2001},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger2000,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Helmuth Plessners exzentrisch-zentrische Positionalit{\"a}t als die naturphilosophische Emanzipation der Hegelschen Geisteskonzeption vom Paradigma des Selbstbewußtseins},
  isbn      = {3-05-0035-33-1},
  year      = {2000},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger2000,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Das Spiel zwischen Leibsein und K{\"o}rperhaben : Helmuth Plessners Philosophische Anthropologie},
  year      = {2000},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger2000,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Das Schauspiel der Kultur im Spiegel der Natur : Einleitung in den Schwerpunkt ; Helmuth Plessners Philosophische Anthropologie},
  year      = {2000},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{Krueger1999,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Das Spektrum menschlicher Ph{\"a}nomene},
  series = {Zwischen Lachen und Weinen},
  volume    = {1},
  journal   = {Zwischen Lachen und Weinen},
  publisher = {Walter de Gruyter GmbH Co.KG},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {3-05-003414-9},
  pages     = {289 S.},
  year      = {1999},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger1999,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Prozesse der {\"o}ffentlichen Untersuchung : zum Potential einer zweiten Modernisierung in John Deweys "Logic : the theory of inquiry"},
  year      = {1999},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger1999,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Schwerpunkt: Bildung, Moral und Untersuchung : John Dewey in der Diskussion},
  year      = {1999},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger1999,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Kommunikation, kommunikatives Handeln},
  year      = {1999},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger1999,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Zwischen Leibsein und K{\"o}rperhaben : Helmuth Plessners philosophisch-anthropologischer Blick},
  year      = {1999},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Krueger2016,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Grenzen aus Sicht der Philosophischen Anthropologie Helmuth Plessners},
  series = {Grenzen im Fokus der Wissenschaften},
  booktitle = {Grenzen im Fokus der Wissenschaften},
  publisher = {Trafo},
  address   = {Berlin},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {101 -- 120},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{KruegerDemmerlingHabermas2016,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter and Demmerling, Christoph and Habermas, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {Kommunikative Vernunft},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  number    = {125},
  issn      = {1866-8380},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-397848},
  pages     = {22},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {J{\"u}rgen Habermas explicates the concept of communicative reason. He explains the key assumptions of the philosophy of language and social theory associated with this concept. Also discussed is the category of life-world and the role of the body-mind difference for the consciousness of exclusivity in our access to subjective experience. as well as the role of emotions and perceptions in the context of a theory of communicative action. The question of the redemption of the various validity claims as they are associated with the performance of speech acts is related to processes of social learning and to the role of negative experiences. Finally the interview deals with the relationship between religion and reason and the importance of religion in modern, post-secular societies. Questions about the philosophical culture of our present times are discussed at the end of the conversation.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger2017,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Die doppelte Kritik der Philosophischen Anthropologie und die Vieldeutigkeit des theoretischen Anti-Humanismus},
  series = {Das Leben im Menschen oder der Mensch im Leben?},
  journal   = {Das Leben im Menschen oder der Mensch im Leben?},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-382-4},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-395891},
  pages     = {31 -- 58},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger2021,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Der geistig-kulturelle Umgang mit der Covid-19-Pandemie und ihrer Wirtschaftskrise als Testfall},
  series = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  volume    = {69},
  journal   = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0012-1045},
  doi       = {10.1515/dzph-2021-0004},
  pages     = {67 -- 97},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Why has the global West (North America, Europe) handled the covid-19 pandemic and the corresponding economic crisis so much worse than the global East (East Asia)? The crises demonstrate the degree to which the West is shaped by its forms of competition and the East by its forms of cooperation. In the West, we have become habitualised to American neoliberalism over the last two generations. In the East, varieties of neo-Confucianism and neo-Buddhism have been transformed into national cultures. The way humans understand their position in the world intellectually and react to crises according to corresponding habit makes an effective difference. The present comparison between global East and West makes use of Hannah Arendt's conception of politics and the shared world as well as of Helmuth Plessner's conception of mediated immediacy in forms of modern biopower. The pandemic is a catalyst within the decline of the West and the rise of the East.},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{EbkeZanfiKruegeretal.2017,
  author    = {Ebke, Thomas and Zanfi, Caterina and Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter and Sommer, Christian and Viennet, Thomas and Johannßen, Dennis and Balzaretti, Ugo and Toussaint Ondoua, Herv{\´e} and Agard, Olivier and Henckmann, Wolfhart and Simonotti, Edoardo and Hand, Annika and Tavakkoli, Amirpasha and Hackbarth, Daniel and Edinger, Sebastian and Schollmeyer, Justus and von Kalckreuth, Moritz Alexander and Schmieg, Gregor and Batista Rates, Bruno and Kressmann, Philipp and Hilt, Annette and van Buuren, Jasper and Keusch, Juliane and Guzun, Mădălina and Bruff, Kyla and Stahl, Marion and Held, Lukas},
  title     = {Das Leben im Menschen oder der Mensch im Leben?},
  editor    = {Ebke, Thomas and Zanfi, Caterina},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-382-4},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-95409},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {514 Seiten},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {In der Philosophie des 20. Jahrhunderts wird deutlich, dass es in Frankreich und in Deutschland voneinander abweichende Sichtweisen auf die Frage gibt, ob der Mensch eine "Sonderstellung" in der Dynamik des biologischen und geschichtlichen Lebens genießt. W{\"a}hrend sich in Deutschland die Tradition eines anthropologischen Denkens neu formiert, ist in Frankreich eine scharfe Skepsis gegen{\"u}ber dem Erbe des Humanismus charakteristisch. Die Beitr{\"a}ge dieses zweisprachigen Buches untersuchen diese deutsch-franz{\"o}sische Konstellation von Fragen und Autoren, und aktualisieren die Reflexion auf die (Grenzen der) Singularit{\"a}t des Menschen.},
  language  = {de}
}