@article{DroixheHassler2000, author = {Droixhe, Daniel and Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Pr{\´e}sentation des Travaux de la section "Histoire de la linguistique"}, isbn = {3-484-50371-8}, year = {2000}, language = {fr} } @article{HarthHasslerKostaetal.2008, author = {Harth, Helene and Haßler, Gerda and Kosta, Peter and Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter and Tristram, Hildegard L. C. and Wegener, Heide and Stehl, Thomas}, title = {Laudation zur Verleihung des Doktogrades ehrenhalber an Herrn Prof. em. Dr. phil. Helmut L{\"u}dke}, isbn = {978-3- 8233-6362-0}, year = {2008}, language = {de} } @article{Hassler2022, author = {Hassler, Gerda}, title = {Jos{\´e} Jes{\´u}s G{\´o}mez Asencio (4.5.1953 - 20.3.2022)}, series = {Beitr{\"a}ge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft}, volume = {16}, journal = {Beitr{\"a}ge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft}, number = {32/2}, publisher = {Nodus-Publ.}, address = {M{\"u}nster}, issn = {0939-2815}, pages = {131 -- 136}, year = {2022}, language = {de} } @article{Hassler2021, author = {Hassler, Gerda}, title = {Meaning and Function}, series = {Concordia discors vs. discordia concors : international journal for researches into comparative literature, contrastive linguistics, cross-cultural and translation strategies}, journal = {Concordia discors vs. discordia concors : international journal for researches into comparative literature, contrastive linguistics, cross-cultural and translation strategies}, number = {16}, publisher = {Ştefan cel Mare University Press}, address = {Suceava}, issn = {2065-4057}, pages = {17 -- 50}, year = {2021}, abstract = {The use of the word functional in the most diverse theories and approaches has contributed in no small measure to the confusion in linguistics today. This article does not claim to give an overview of the different directions of functionalism in linguistics. Rather, the aim is to present what Coseriu's view characterised as functional in his time and to what extent his theory outlined a path that still makes sense in functional-cognitive linguistics today. This will involve an examination of Coseriu's difficult-to-identify concept of function. Furthermore, the article will also show that functional thinking is relevant for current grammatography.}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2020, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Pasigraf{\´i}a y antipasigraf{\´i}a a finales del siglo XVIII y a principios del siglo XIX}, volume = {41}, editor = {Calero Vaquerao, Mar{\´i}a Luisa}, publisher = {Infoling}, address = {Barcelona}, issn = {1139-8736}, pages = {169 -- 192}, year = {2020}, abstract = {In 1797 a rather short work appeared in Paris in two volumes, under the title Pasigraphie in both its French and German versions. The author, Joseph de Maimieux (1753-1820), is said to have coined the term pasigraphie. With the invention of pasigraphy, Maimieux pursued the goal of creating a conceptually based writing system that could be applied to all languages. In this way, a text written in this script could be read in all languages. The pasigraphic system is based on an a priori system of conceptual classification to which written characters are assigned. It is therefore initially an exclusively written language, on which Maimieux two years later also built a spoken language with the Pasilalie. The first arguments against the endeavour represented by the Pasigraphie were brought forward by Maimieux' immediate contemporaries, the ideologues. These objections were re-affirmed in particular by Johann Severin Vater. The decisive difference between Maimieux and his critics lies in the determination of the role of signs in the formation of concepts. While for Maimieux the signs only name the finished concepts, his critics argued that signs have a function in the constitution of the concepts. A universal language is therefore ultimately not possible, since there are no universal concepts and the individual languages lead to different conceptual structures.}, language = {es} } @article{Hassler2020, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {The Functional-Communicative Approach to Language of the Potsdam School in the German Democratic Republic}, series = {History of Humanities}, volume = {5}, journal = {History of Humanities}, number = {1}, publisher = {The University of Chicago Press Journals}, address = {Chicago}, issn = {2379-3163}, pages = {31 -- 49}, year = {2020}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2021, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Adverbal expression of aspectuality and interaction with perfective and imperfective verbs}, series = {Russian Grammar: System - Usus - Variation/Русская грамматика: Cистема - узус - варьирование}, journal = {Russian Grammar: System - Usus - Variation/Русская грамматика: Cистема - узус - варьирование}, publisher = {Lang}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-631-87748-7}, pages = {219 -- 234}, year = {2021}, abstract = {This paper intends to explore the interaction between aspect and lexical means, in this case temporal adverbials, in the bounding of representations of situations. First, the theoretical basis is outlined, followed by the results of a corpus analysis of coccurrences with adverbs that limit situations. The term situation encompasses all representable processes, states, events, or actions. Finally, some theoretical conclusions are drawn concerning the cognitive category of bounding, using the example of aspectuality. The imperfective verb forms maintain their aspectuality in delimiting connections with adverbs, resulting in a complex, multi-dimensional aspectuality. In nongrammaticalized forms, such as lexical markers, the speaker is free to make a temporal localization or an aspectual perspective. Lexical expressions can make temporal and aspect markings even more precisely and clearly than tenses. They can also limit or extend situations and thus express aspect. Aspectuality thus presents itself as a compositional category, in which external bounding and the internal representation of a course of action or development can interact.}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2013, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {La vision linguistique du monde : mythe et r{\´e}alit{\´e} de l'utilisation d'une notion humboldtienne au XXe si{\`e}cle}, series = {Dossiers d'HEL ; SHESL}, journal = {Dossiers d'HEL ; SHESL}, number = {6}, address = {Paris}, issn = {1638-1580}, pages = {7}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Les repr{\´e}sentants du relativisme linguistique du XX{\`e}me si{\`e}cle qui se r{\´e}clament de l'histoire de leur th{\´e}orie mentionnent normalement Guillaume de Humboldt comme initiateur de l'id{\´e}e que la mani{\`e}re particuli{\`e}re de penser d'un peuple d{\´e}pendrait de sa langue. La th{\´e}orie de Humboldt s'av{\`e}re, cependant, difficilement maniable dans la recherche linguistique. Malgr{\´e} une similitude {\´e}vidente dans certaines positions, comme par exemple les concepts d''articulation' et de 'valeur', le renouvellement de la linguistique sur une base saussurienne, au d{\´e}but du XX{\`e}me si{\`e}cle, se passait des id{\´e}es de Humboldt. Il n'y avait que quelques philologues 'id{\´e}alistes' qui poursuivaient ce type de recherche. Ainsi, Karl Vossler constatait un parall{\´e}lisme entre la langue et la culture et les consid{\´e}rait comme r{\´e}sultats de la cr{\´e}ation humaine. Le m{\´e}contentement quant {\`a} la description des langues selon le paradigme positiviste des n{\´e}ogrammairiens s'articulait nettement. Le concept d'une vision linguistique du monde fut d{\´e}velopp{\´e} dans la th{\´e}orie des n{\´e}ohumboldtiens (Weisgerber, Trier et autres) qui affirmaient que l'individu s'approprie le monde {\`a} travers la langue. Des diff{\´e}rences entre des langues influeraient consid{\´e}rablement sur les facult{\´e}s cognitives des hommes et sur leur comportement. L'id{\´e}e humboldtienne de l'energeia se trouvait exclue de ces th{\´e}ories qui aspiraient {\`a} un renouvellement de la langue maternelle dans le sens d'une 'grammaire {\`a} partir du contenu' (inhaltbezogene Grammatik). Ce type de r{\´e}flexion linguistique se pr{\^e}tait aussi {\`a} une utilisation politique sous le national-socialisme. La th{\´e}orie de Weisgerber, d{\´e}clar{\´e}e comme antiraciste et anti-national-socialiste par l'auteur lui-m{\^e}me, fut consid{\´e}r{\´e}e comme « mother-tongue fascism » par Christopher Hutton. La relation entre le relativisme linguistique et la doctrine nationale-socialiste est {\´e}vidente dans les {\´e}crits de plusieurs auteurs, par exemple dans « notre langue maternelle comme arme et instrument de la pens{\´e}e allemande » de Georg Schmidt-Rohr. Il y eut des implications racistes de la th{\´e}orie de quelques indo-germanistes bien avant 1933. L'influence des n{\´e}ohumboldtiens s'est poursuivie jusqu'aux ann{\´e}es 60, {\´e}poque o{\`u} ils durent faire place {\`a} des linguistes structuralistes et g{\´e}n{\´e}rativistes. On trouve dans quelques v{\´e}rifications plus r{\´e}centes du relativisme linguistique des r{\´e}f{\´e}rences {\`a} des textes ant{\´e}rieurs {\`a} Humboldt. Par exemple, Gumperz et Levison (1996) citent le concours de l'Acad{\´e}mie de Berlin sur la question suivante : Quelle est l'influence r{\´e}ciproque des opinions du peuple sur le langage et du langage sur les opinions? Est-ce que cet {\´e}largissement de l'horizon de r{\´e}trospection a quelque chose {\`a} voir avec la conscience d'une port{\´e}e sociale possible de cette th{\´e}orie ?}, language = {fr} } @article{Hassler2008, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Tagungsbericht Internationales Kolloquium Revolutions saussuriennes, Genf 20.-22. Juni 2007}, year = {2008}, language = {de} } @article{Hassler2008, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Der unendliche Gebrauch endlicher Mittel : Erkl{\"a}rungen sprachlicher Kreativit{\"a}t des Menschen}, isbn = {978-3-534-17505-5}, year = {2008}, language = {de} }