@incollection{VladovaUllrichBenderetal.2021,
  author    = {Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Bender, Benedict and Gronau, Norbert},
  title     = {Yes, we can (?)},
  series = {Technology and innovation in learning, teaching and education : second international conference, TECH-EDU 2020, Vila Real, Portugal, December 2-4, 2020 : proceedings},
  booktitle = {Technology and innovation in learning, teaching and education : second international conference, TECH-EDU 2020, Vila Real, Portugal, December 2-4, 2020 : proceedings},
  editor    = {Reis, Ars{\´e}nio and Barroso, Jo{\~a}o and Lopes, J. Bernardino and Mikropoulos, Tassos and Fan, Chih-Wen},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Cham},
  isbn      = {978-3-030-73987-4},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-030-73988-1_17},
  pages     = {225 -- 235},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The COVID-19 crisis has caused an extreme situation for higher education institutions around the world, where exclusively virtual teaching and learning has become obligatory rather than an additional supporting feature. This has created opportunities to explore the potential and limitations of virtual learning formats. This paper presents four theses on virtual classroom teaching and learning that are discussed critically. We use existing theoretical insights extended by empirical evidence from a survey of more than 850 students on acceptance, expectations, and attitudes regarding the positive and negative aspects of virtual teaching. The survey responses were gathered from students at different universities during the first completely digital semester (Spring-Summer 2020) in Germany. We discuss similarities and differences between the subjects being studied and highlight the advantages and disadvantages of virtual teaching and learning. Against the background of existing theory and the gathered data, we emphasize the importance of social interaction, the combination of different learning formats, and thus context-sensitive hybrid learning as the learning form of the future.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{VladovaGronauRuedian2019,
  author    = {Vladova, Gergana and Gronau, Norbert and R{\"u}dian, Sylvio Leo},
  title     = {Wissenstransfer in Bildung und Weiterbildung},
  series = {Digitale Transformation - gutes Arbeiten und Qualifizierung aktiv gestalten},
  booktitle = {Digitale Transformation - gutes Arbeiten und Qualifizierung aktiv gestalten},
  publisher = {Gito},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-95545-309-1},
  pages     = {89 -- 106},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{GronauVladovaThim2008,
  author    = {Gronau, Norbert and Vladova, Gergana and Thim, Christof},
  title     = {Umgang mit Wissen im interkulturellen Vergleich},
  series = {Umgang mit Wissen im interkulturellen Vergleich : Beitr{\"a}ge aus Forschung und Unternehmenspraxis ; Acatech-Workshop, Potsdam, 20. Mai 2008},
  volume    = {2008},
  booktitle = {Umgang mit Wissen im interkulturellen Vergleich : Beitr{\"a}ge aus Forschung und Unternehmenspraxis ; Acatech-Workshop, Potsdam, 20. Mai 2008},
  publisher = {Fraunhofer-IRB-Verl.},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  isbn      = {978-3-8167-7822-6},
  pages     = {11 -- 25},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {Die Bedeutung der Ressource Wissen f{\"u}r die Unternehmensentwicklung ist heutzutage unumstritten. Um wettbewerbsf{\"a}hig bleiben zu k{\"o}nnen, m{\"u}ssen Unternehmen die Erzeugung, Teilung und systematische Nutzung von Wissen f{\"o}rdern. Dabei stehen sowohl die individuelle Wissensbasis (und damit jeder Mitarbeiter) als auch die kollektive Wissensbasis (und damit das ganze Unternehmen) im Vordergrund. Der Faktor Kultur gewinnt in diesem Zusammenhang zunehmend an Bedeutung: Er beeinflusst alle drei Ebenen des Wissensmanagements - Mensch, Organisation und Technologie. Neben den Besonderheiten der Organisationskultur und der Kultur unterschiedlicher Mitarbeitergruppen sind in international agierenden Unternehmen auch die spezifischen Merkmale der jeweiligen Landeskultur zu ber{\"u}cksichtigen. Gemeinsam mit dem Lehrstuhl f{\"u}r Wirtschaftsinformatik und Electronic Government der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam hat acatech im Mai 2008 einen Workshop mit Vertretern aus Wirtschaft, Politik und Wissenschaft zum Umgang mit Wissen im interkulturellen Vergleich veranstaltet. Vor diesem Hintergrund entstand der acatech diskutiert-Band "Umgang mit Wissen im interkulturellen Vergleich - Beitr{\"a}ge aus Forschung und Unternehmenspraxis". Darin enthalten sind Beitr{\"a}ge, die u. a. danach fragen, welche wechselseitigen Beziehungen zwischen Technik und Kultur bestehen, inwieweit Experten- und Wissensnetzwerke als interkulturelles Instrument zum Umgang mit Wissen geeignet sind, wie Unternehmen ihre Mitarbeiter auf Auslandseins{\"a}tze und die Begegnung mit fremden Kulturen vorbereiten k{\"o}nnen und welche Rolle Kommunikation als Methode des Wissenstransfers spielt.},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{GonnermannBrandenburgerVladovaetal.2023,
  author    = {Gonnermann, Jana and Brandenburger, Bonny and Vladova, Gergana and Gronau, Norbert},
  title     = {To what extent can individualisation in terms of different types of mode improve learning outcomes and learner satisfaction?},
  series = {Proceedings of the 56th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences January 3-6, 2023},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 56th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences January 3-6, 2023},
  editor    = {Bui, Tung X.},
  publisher = {Department of IT Management Shidler College of Business University of Hawaii},
  address   = {Honolulu, HI},
  isbn      = {978-0-9981331-6-4},
  pages     = {123 -- 132},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {With the latest technological developments and associated new possibilities in teaching, the personalisation of learning is gaining more and more importance. It assumes that individual learning experiences and results could generally be improved when personal learning preferences are considered. To do justice to the complexity of the personalisation possibilities of teaching and learning processes, we illustrate the components of learning and teaching in the digital environment and their interdependencies in an initial model. Furthermore, in a pre-study, we investigate the relationships between the learner's ability to (digital) self-organise, the learner's prior- knowledge learning in different variants of mode and learning outcomes as one part of this model. With this pre-study, we are taking the first step towards a holistic model of teaching and learning in digital environments.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{VladovaUllrichBenderetal.2021,
  author    = {Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Bender, Benedict and Gronau, Norbert},
  title     = {Students' Acceptance of Technology-Mediated Teaching - How It Was Influenced During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020: A Study From Germany},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  issn      = {1867-5808},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-52161},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-521615},
  pages     = {17},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In response to the impending spread of COVID-19, universities worldwide abruptly stopped face-to-face teaching and switched to technology-mediated teaching. As a result, the use of technology in the learning processes of students of different disciplines became essential and the only way to teach, communicate and collaborate for months. In this crisis context, we conducted a longitudinal study in four German universities, in which we collected a total of 875 responses from students of information systems and music and arts at four points in time during the spring-summer 2020 semester. Our study focused on (1) the students' acceptance of technology-mediated learning, (2) any change in this acceptance during the semester and (3) the differences in acceptance between the two disciplines. We applied the Technology Acceptance Model and were able to validate it for the extreme situation of the COVID-19 pandemic. We extended the model with three new variables (time flexibility, learning flexibility and social isolation) that influenced the construct of perceived usefulness. Furthermore, we detected differences between the disciplines and over time. In this paper, we present and discuss our study's results and derive short- and long-term implications for science and practice.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{VladovaUllrichBenderetal.2021,
  author    = {Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Bender, Benedict and Gronau, Norbert},
  title     = {Students' acceptance of technology-mediated teaching - How it was influenced during the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020},
  series = {Frontiers in psychology / Frontiers Research Foundation},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Frontiers in psychology / Frontiers Research Foundation},
  publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636086},
  pages     = {15},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In response to the impending spread of COVID-19, universities worldwide abruptly stopped face-to-face teaching and switched to technology-mediated teaching. As a result, the use of technology in the learning processes of students of different disciplines became essential and the only way to teach, communicate and collaborate for months. In this crisis context, we conducted a longitudinal study in four German universities, in which we collected a total of 875 responses from students of information systems and music and arts at four points in time during the spring-summer 2020 semester. Our study focused on (1) the students' acceptance of technology-mediated learning, (2) any change in this acceptance during the semester and (3) the differences in acceptance between the two disciplines. We applied the Technology Acceptance Model and were able to validate it for the extreme situation of the COVID-19 pandemic. We extended the model with three new variables (time flexibility, learning flexibility and social isolation) that influenced the construct of perceived usefulness. Furthermore, we detected differences between the disciplines and over time. In this paper, we present and discuss our study's results and derive short- and long-term implications for science and practice.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GronauRegerAdelhelmetal.2009,
  author    = {Gronau, Norbert and Reger, Guido and Adelhelm, Silvia and Bahrs, Julian and Vladova, Gergana},
  title     = {Planung und Steuerung von offenen Innovationsprozessen in Life Sciences KMUs : Pro und Contra des Know-how- Transfers {\"u}ber die Unternehmensgrenzen},
  issn      = {1434-1890},
  year      = {2009},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{AdelhelmBraunGronauetal.2010,
  author    = {Adelhelm, Silvia and Braun, Andreas and Gronau, Norbert and M{\"u}ller, E. and Vladova, Gergana},
  title     = {Open Innovation : Methodologische Pr{\"a}zisierung und praktische Umsetzung im Projekt Open Innovation in Life Sciences},
  isbn      = {978-3-8396-0141-9},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{AdelhelmBraunGronauetal.2014,
  author    = {Adelhelm, Silvia and Braun, Andreas and Gronau, Norbert and L{\"u}rig, Detlef and M{\"u}ller, Elisabeth and Vladova, Gergana and Wagner, Dieter},
  title     = {Mit Open Innovation zum Erfolg},
  series = {Handbuch prozessorientiertes Wissensmanagment},
  journal   = {Handbuch prozessorientiertes Wissensmanagment},
  publisher = {GITO},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-95545-026-7},
  pages     = {211 -- 226},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{VladovaWotschackLareiroetal.2020,
  author    = {Vladova, Gergana and Wotschack, Philip and Lareiro, Patricia de Paiva and Gronau, Norbert and Thim, Christof},
  title     = {Lernen mit Assistenzsystemen},
  series = {Industrie 4.0 Management : Gegenwart und Zukunft industrieller Gesch{\"a}ftsprozesse},
  volume    = {36},
  journal   = {Industrie 4.0 Management : Gegenwart und Zukunft industrieller Gesch{\"a}ftsprozesse},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {GITO mbH Verlag},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2364-9208},
  doi       = {10.30844/I40M_20-3_S16-20},
  pages     = {16 -- 20},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Der Beitrag beschreibt die Konzeption und Durchf{\"u}hrung und bietet einen Einblick in die ersten Ergebnisse einer Untersuchung mit experimentellem Design in einer simulierten Prozessumgebung im Forschungs- und Anwendungszentrum Industrie 4.0 in Potsdam. Im Mittelpunkt stehen Anlernprozesse im Bereich der Einfacharbeit (Helfert{\"a}tigkeiten) und ihre Gestaltung durch den Einsatz digitaler Assistenzsysteme. In der Arbeitsforschung finden sich Hinweise darauf, dass mit dem Einsatz dieser Systeme Prozesswissen verloren geht, im Sinne einer guten Kenntnis des gesamten Arbeitsprozesses, in den die einzelnen T{\"a}tigkeiten eingebettet sind. Das kann sich als Problem erweisen, vor allem wenn unvorhersehbare Situationen oder Fehler eintreten. Um die Rolle von Prozesswissen beim Einsatz von digitalen Assistenzsystemen zu untersuchen, wird im Experiment eine echte Fabriksituation simuliert. Die Probanden werden {\"u}ber ein Assistenzsystem Schritt f{\"u}r Schritt in ihre Aufgabent{\"a}tigkeit angelernt, einem Teil der Probanden wird allerdings am Anfang zus{\"a}tzlich Prozesswissen im Rahmen einer kurzen Schulung vermittelt.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{GronauVladovaWeberetal.2014,
  author    = {Gronau, Norbert and Vladova, Gergana and Weber, Nadja and Heinze, Priscilla and Weber, Edzard},
  title     = {KMDL® v2.2},
  series = {Handbuch prozessorientiertes Wissensmanagment},
  journal   = {Handbuch prozessorientiertes Wissensmanagment},
  publisher = {GITO},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-95545-026-7},
  pages     = {133 -- 198},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{VladovaGronau2022,
  author    = {Vladova, Gergana and Gronau, Norbert},
  title     = {KI-basierte Assistenzsysteme in betrieblichen Lernprozessen},
  series = {Industrie 4.0 Management : Gegenwart und Zukunft industrieller Gesch{\"a}ftsprozesse},
  volume    = {38},
  journal   = {Industrie 4.0 Management : Gegenwart und Zukunft industrieller Gesch{\"a}ftsprozesse},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {GITO mbH Verlag f{\"u}r Industrielle Informationstechnik und Organisation},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2364-9216},
  doi       = {10.30844/I40M_22-2_11-14},
  pages     = {11 -- 14},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Assistenzsysteme finden im Kontext der digitalen Transformation immer mehr Einsatz. Sie k{\"o}nnen Besch{\"a}ftigte in industriellen Produktionsprozessen sowohl in der Anlern- als auch in der aktiven Arbeitsphase unterst{\"u}tzen. Kompetenzen k{\"o}nnen so arbeitsplatz- und prozessnah sowie bedarfsorientiert aufgebaut werden. In diesem Beitrag wird der aktuelle Forschungsstand zu den Einsatzm{\"o}glichkeiten dieser Assistenzsysteme diskutiert und mit Beispielen illustriert. Es werden unter anderem auch Herausforderungen f{\"u}r den Einsatz aufgezeigt. Am Ende des Beitrags werden Potenziale f{\"u}r die zuk{\"u}nftige Nutzung von AS in industriellen Lernprozessen und f{\"u}r die Forschung identifiziert.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{TeichmannVladovaGronau2023,
  author    = {Teichmann, Malte and Vladova, Gergana and Gronau, Norbert},
  title     = {Conception of subject-oriented learning},
  series = {SSRN eLibrary / Social Science Research Network},
  journal   = {SSRN eLibrary / Social Science Research Network},
  publisher = {Social Science Electronic Publ.},
  address   = {[Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]},
  issn      = {1556-5068},
  doi       = {10.2139/ssrn.4457995},
  pages     = {6},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Competence development must change at all didactic levels to meet the new requirements triggered by digitization. Unlike classic learning theories and the resulting popular approaches (e.g., sender-receiver model), future-oriented vocational training must include new learning theory impulses in the discussion about competence acquisition. On the one hand, these impulses are often very well elaborated on the theoretical side, but the transfer into innovative learning environments - such as learning factories - is often still missing. On the other hand, actual learning factory (design) approaches often concentrate primarily on the technical side. Subject-oriented learning theory enables the design of competence development-oriented vocational training projectsin learning factories in which persons can obtain relevant competencies for digitization. At the same time, such learning theory approaches assume a potentially infinite number of learning interests and reasons. Following this, competence development is always located in an institutional or organizational context. The paper conceptionally answers how this theoryimmanent challenge is synthesizable with the reality of organizationally competence development requirements.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{UllrichVladovaMarquartetal.2022,
  author    = {Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Vladova, Gergana and Marquart, Danny and Braun, Andreas and Gronau, Norbert},
  title     = {An overwiew of benefits and risks in open innovation projects and the influence of intermediary participation, decision-making authority, experience, and position on their perception},
  series = {International journal of innovation management : IJIM},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {International journal of innovation management : IJIM},
  number    = {02},
  publisher = {World Scientific Publ.},
  address   = {Singapore},
  issn      = {1363-9196},
  doi       = {10.1142/S1363919622500128},
  pages     = {41},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {This paper presents an exploratory study investigating the influence of the factors (1) intermediary participation, (2) decision-making authority, (3) position in the enterprise, and (4) experience in open innovation on the perception and assessment of the benefits and risks expected from participating in open innovation projects. For this purpose, an online survey was conducted in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. The result of this paper is an empirical evidence showing whether and how these factors affect the perception of potential benefits and risks expected within the context of open innovation project participation. Furthermore, the identified effects are discussed against the theory. Existing theory regarding the benefits and risks of open innovation is expanded by (1) finding that they are perceived mostly independently of the factors, (2) confirming the practical relevance of benefits and risks, and (3) enabling a finer distinction between their degrees of relevance according to respective contextual specifics.},
  language  = {en}
}