@article{FagesHanghojKhanetal.2019,
  author    = {Fages, Antoine and Hanghoj, Kristian and Khan, Naveed and Gaunitz, Charleen and Seguin-Orlando, Andaine and Leonardi, Michela and Constantz, Christian McCrory and Gamba, Cristina and Al-Rasheid, Khaled A. S. and Albizuri, Silvia and Alfarhan, Ahmed H. and Allentoft, Morten and Alquraishi, Saleh and Anthony, David and Baimukhanov, Nurbol and Barrett, James H. and Bayarsaikhan, Jamsranjav and Benecke, Norbert and Bernaldez-Sanchez, Eloisa and Berrocal-Rangel, Luis and Biglari, Fereidoun and Boessenkool, Sanne and Boldgiv, Bazartseren and Brem, Gottfried and Brown, Dorcas and Burger, Joachim and Crubezy, Eric and Daugnora, Linas and Davoudi, Hossein and Damgaard, Peter de Barros and de Chorro y de Villa-Ceballos, Maria de los Angeles and Deschler-Erb, Sabine and Detry, Cleia and Dill, Nadine and Oom, Maria do Mar and Dohr, Anna and Ellingvag, Sturla and Erdenebaatar, Diimaajav and Fathi, Homa and Felkel, Sabine and Fernandez-Rodriguez, Carlos and Garcia-Vinas, Esteban and Germonpre, Mietje and Granado, Jose D. and Hallsson, Jon H. and Hemmer, Helmut and Hofreiter, Michael and Kasparov, Aleksei and Khasanov, Mutalib and Khazaeli, Roya and Kosintsev, Pavel and Kristiansen, Kristian and Kubatbek, Tabaldiev and Kuderna, Lukas and Kuznetsov, Pavel and Laleh, Haeedeh and Leonard, Jennifer A. and Lhuillier, Johanna and von Lettow-Vorbeck, Corina Liesau and Logvin, Andrey and Lougas, Lembi and Ludwig, Arne and Luis, Cristina and Arruda, Ana Margarida and Marques-Bonet, Tomas and Silva, Raquel Matoso and Merz, Victor and Mijiddorj, Enkhbayar and Miller, Bryan K. and Monchalov, Oleg and Mohaseb, Fatemeh A. and Morales, Arturo and Nieto-Espinet, Ariadna and Nistelberger, Heidi and Onar, Vedat and Palsdottir, Albina H. and Pitulko, Vladimir and Pitskhelauri, Konstantin and Pruvost, Melanie and Sikanjic, Petra Rajic and Papesa, Anita Rapan and Roslyakova, Natalia and Sardari, Alireza and Sauer, Eberhard and Schafberg, Renate and Scheu, Amelie and Schibler, Jorg and Schlumbaum, Angela and Serrand, Nathalie and Serres-Armero, Aitor and Shapiro, Beth and Seno, Shiva Sheikhi and Shevnina, Irina and Shidrang, Sonia and Southon, John and Star, Bastiaan and Sykes, Naomi and Taheri, Kamal and Taylor, William and Teegen, Wolf-Rudiger and Vukicevic, Tajana Trbojevic and Trixl, Simon and Tumen, Dashzeveg and Undrakhbold, Sainbileg and Usmanova, Emma and Vahdati, Ali and Valenzuela-Lamas, Silvia and Viegas, Catarina and Wallner, Barbara and Weinstock, Jaco and Zaibert, Victor and Clavel, Benoit and Lepetz, Sebastien and Mashkour, Marjan and Helgason, Agnar and Stefansson, Kari and Barrey, Eric and Willerslev, Eske and Outram, Alan K. and Librado, Pablo and Orlando, Ludovic},
  title     = {Tracking five millennia of horse management with extensive ancient genome time series},
  series = {Cell},
  volume    = {177},
  journal   = {Cell},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Cell Press},
  address   = {Cambridge},
  issn      = {0092-8674},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.049},
  pages     = {1419 -- 1435},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Horse domestication revolutionized warfare and accelerated travel, trade, and the geographic expansion of languages. Here, we present the largest DNA time series for a non-human organism to date, including genome-scale data from 149 ancient animals and 129 ancient genomes (>= 1-fold coverage), 87 of which are new. This extensive dataset allows us to assess the modem legacy of past equestrian civilisations. We find that two extinct horse lineages existed during early domestication, one at the far western (Iberia) and the other at the far eastern range (Siberia) of Eurasia. None of these contributed significantly to modern diversity. We show that the influence of Persian-related horse lineages increased following the Islamic conquests in Europe and Asia. Multiple alleles associated with elite-racing, including at the MSTN "speed gene," only rose in popularity within the last millennium. Finally, the development of modem breeding impacted genetic diversity more dramatically than the previous millennia of human management.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ChangKnappEnketal.2017,
  author    = {Chang, Dan and Knapp, Michael and Enk, Jacob and Lippold, Sebastian and Kircher, Martin and Lister, Adrian M. and MacPhee, Ross D. E. and Widga, Christopher and Czechowski, Paul and Sommer, Robert and Hodges, Emily and St{\"u}mpel, Nikolaus and Barnes, Ian and Dal{\´e}n, Love and Derevianko, Anatoly and Germonpr{\´e}, Mietje and Hillebrand-Voiculescu, Alexandra and Constantin, Silviu and Kuznetsova, Tatyana and Mol, Dick and Rathgeber, Thomas and Rosendahl, Wilfried and Tikhonov, Alexey N. and Willerslev, Eske and Hannon, Greg and Lalueza i Fox, Carles and Joger, Ulrich and Poinar, Hendrik N. and Hofreiter, Michael and Shapiro, Beth},
  title     = {The evolutionary and phylogeographic history of woolly mammoths},
  series = {Scientific reports},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Scientific reports},
  publisher = {Nature Publishing Group},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {2045-2322},
  doi       = {10.1038/srep44585},
  pages     = {10},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Near the end of the Pleistocene epoch, populations of the woolly mammoth (Mammuthus primigenius) were distributed across parts of three continents, from western Europe and northern Asia through Beringia to the Atlantic seaboard of North America. Nonetheless, questions about the connectivity and temporal continuity of mammoth populations and species remain unanswered. We use a combination of targeted enrichment and high-throughput sequencing to assemble and interpret a data set of 143 mammoth mitochondrial genomes, sampled from fossils recovered from across their Holarctic range. Our dataset includes 54 previously unpublished mitochondrial genomes and significantly increases the coverage of the Eurasian range of the species. The resulting global phylogeny confirms that the Late Pleistocene mammoth population comprised three distinct mitochondrial lineages that began to diverge ~1.0-2.0 million years ago (Ma). We also find that mammoth mitochondrial lineages were strongly geographically partitioned throughout the Pleistocene. In combination, our genetic results and the pattern of morphological variation in time and space suggest that male-mediated gene flow, rather than large-scale dispersals, was important in the Pleistocene evolutionary history of mammoths.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GermonpreSablinLaznickovaGaletovaetal.2015,
  author    = {Germonpre, Mietje and Sablin, Mikhail V. and Laznickova-Galetova, Martina and Despres, Viviane and Stevens, Rhiannon E. and Stiller, Mathias and Hofreiter, Michael},
  title     = {Palaeolithic dogs and Pleistocene wolves revisited: a reply to Morey (2014)},
  series = {Journal of archaeological science},
  volume    = {54},
  journal   = {Journal of archaeological science},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {0305-4403},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jas.2014.11.035},
  pages     = {210 -- 216},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {This is a reply to the comments of Morey (2014) on our identification of Palaeolithic dogs from several European Palaeolithic sites. In his comments Morey (2014) presents some misrepresentations and misunderstandings that we remedy here. In contrast to what Morey (2014) propounds, our results suggest that the domestication of the wolf was a long process that started early in the Upper Palaeolithic and that since that time two sympatric canid morphotypes can be seen in Eurasian sites: Pleistocene wolves and Palaeolithic dogs. Contrary to Morey (2014), we are convinced that the study of this domestication process should be multidisciplinary. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
  language  = {en}
}