@article{XiangGaoCaietal.2017, author = {Xiang, Hai and Gao, Jianqiang and Cai, Dawei and Luo, Yunbing and Yu, Baoquan and Liu, Langqing and Liu, Ranran and Zhou, Hui and Chen, Xiaoyong and Dun, Weitao and Wang, Xi and Hofreiter, Michael and Zhao, Xingbo}, title = {Origin and dispersal of early domestic pigs in northern China}, series = {Scientific reports}, volume = {7}, journal = {Scientific reports}, publisher = {Nature Publ. Group}, address = {London}, issn = {2045-2322}, doi = {10.1038/s41598-017-06056-8}, pages = {9}, year = {2017}, abstract = {It is widely accepted that modern pigs were domesticated independently at least twice, and Chinese native pigs are deemed as direct descendants of the first domesticated pigs in the corresponding domestication centers. By analyzing mitochondrial DNA sequences of an extensive sample set spanning 10,000 years, we find that the earliest pigs from the middle Yellow River region already carried the maternal lineages that are dominant in both younger archaeological populations and modern Chinese pigs. Our data set also supports early Neolithic pig utilization and a long-term in situ origin for northeastern Chinese pigs during 8,000-3,500 BP, suggesting a possibly independent domestication in northeast China. Additionally, we observe a genetic replacement in ancient northeast Chinese pigs since 3,500 BP. The results not only provide increasing evidence for pig origin in the middle Yellow River region but also depict an outline for the process of early pig domestication in northeast China.}, language = {en} } @misc{XiangGaoYuetal.2015, author = {Xiang, Hai and Gao, Jianqiang and Yu, Baoquan and Hofreiter, Michael and Zhao, Xingbo}, title = {Reply to Peters et al.: Further discussions confirm early Holocene chicken domestication in northern China}, series = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, volume = {112}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, number = {19}, publisher = {National Acad. of Sciences}, address = {Washington}, issn = {0027-8424}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1503956112}, pages = {E2416 -- E2416}, year = {2015}, language = {en} } @article{XiangGaoYuetal.2014, author = {Xiang, Hai and Gao, Jianqiang and Yu, Baoquan and Zhou, Hui and Cai, Dawei and Zhang, Youwen and Chen, Xiaoyong and Wang, Xi and Hofreiter, Michael and Zhao, Xingbo}, title = {Early Holocene chicken domestication in northern China}, series = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, volume = {111}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, number = {49}, publisher = {National Acad. of Sciences}, address = {Washington}, issn = {0027-8424}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1411882111}, pages = {17564 -- 17569}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Chickens represent by far the most important poultry species, yet the number, locations, and timings of their domestication have remained controversial for more than a century. Here we report ancient mitochondrial DNA sequences from the earliest archaeological chicken bones from China, dating back to similar to 10,000 B.P. The results clearly show that all investigated bones, including the oldest from the Nanzhuangtou site, are derived from the genus Gallus, rather than any other related genus, such as Phasianus. Our analyses also suggest that northern China represents one region of the earliest chicken domestication, possibly dating as early as 10,000 y B.P. Similar to the evidence from pig domestication, our results suggest that these early domesticated chickens contributed to the gene pool of modern chicken populations. Moreover, our results support the idea that multiple members of the genus Gallus, specifically Gallus gallus and Gallus sonneratii contributed to the gene pool of the modern domestic chicken. Our results provide further support for the growing evidence of an early mixed agricultural complex in northern China.}, language = {en} }