@article{Guenther2014, author = {G{\"u}nther, Oliver}, title = {Big Data: What is it? And what does it mean for science, economy and society?}, series = {Informatik-Spektrum}, volume = {37}, journal = {Informatik-Spektrum}, number = {2}, publisher = {Springer Verlag}, address = {Heidelberg}, issn = {0170-6012}, doi = {10.1007/s00287-014-0783-7}, pages = {85 -- 86}, year = {2014}, language = {en} } @article{Guenther2013, author = {G{\"u}nther, Oliver}, title = {Die Vorstandsperspektive}, series = {Informatik-Spektrum}, volume = {36}, journal = {Informatik-Spektrum}, number = {6}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Heidelberg}, issn = {0170-6012}, doi = {10.1007/s00287-013-0743-7}, pages = {505 -- 507}, year = {2013}, language = {de} } @article{KrasnovaVeltriGuenther2012, author = {Krasnova, Hanna and Veltri, Natasha F. and G{\"u}nther, Oliver}, title = {Self-disclosure and privacy calculus on social networking sites the role of culture intercultural dynamics of privacy calculus}, series = {Business \& information systems engineering : the international journal of Wirtschaftsinformatik}, volume = {4}, journal = {Business \& information systems engineering : the international journal of Wirtschaftsinformatik}, number = {3}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Heidelberg}, issn = {1867-0202}, doi = {10.1007/s12599-012-0216-6}, pages = {127 -- 135}, year = {2012}, abstract = {Social Network Sites (SNSs) rely exclusively on user-generated content to offer engaging and rewarding experience to its members. As a result, stimulating user communication and self-disclosure is vital for the sustainability of SNSs. However, considering that the SNS users are increasingly culturally diverse, motivating this audience to self-disclose requires understanding of their cultural intricacies. Yet existing research offers only limited insights into the role of culture behind the motivation of SNS users to self-disclose. Building on the privacy calculus framework, this study explores the role of two cultural dimensions - individualism and uncertainty avoidance - in self-disclosure decisions of SNS users. Survey responses of US and German Facebook members are used as the basis for our analysis. Structural equation modeling and multi-group analysis results reveal the distinct role of culture in the cognitive patterns of SNS users. The authors find that trusting beliefs play a key role in the self-disclosure decisions of users from individualistic cultures. At the same time, uncertainty avoidance determines the impact of privacy concerns. This paper contributes to the theory by rejecting the universal nature of privacy calculus processes. The findings provide for an array of managerial implications for SNS providers as they strive to encourage content creation and sharing by their heterogeneous members.}, language = {en} } @misc{Guenther2015, author = {G{\"u}nther, Oliver}, title = {Grußwort des Pr{\"a}sidenten der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, series = {20 Jahre MenschenRechtsZentrum}, journal = {20 Jahre MenschenRechtsZentrum}, editor = {Gunnarsson, Logi and Zimmermann, Andreas}, publisher = {BWV Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag}, address = {Berlin}, pages = {9 -- 11}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @incollection{Guenther2015, author = {G{\"u}nther, Oliver}, title = {Zum Geleit}, series = {Raum und Zahl im Fokus der Wissenschaften : eine multidisziplin{\"a}re Vorlesungsreihe}, booktitle = {Raum und Zahl im Fokus der Wissenschaften : eine multidisziplin{\"a}re Vorlesungsreihe}, publisher = {Trafo}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-86464-082-7}, pages = {7 -- 8}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @article{FabianKunzMuelleretal.2013, author = {Fabian, Benjamin and Kunz, Steffen and M{\"u}ller, Sebastian and G{\"u}nther, Oliver}, title = {Secure federation of semantic information services}, series = {Decision support systems : DSS ; the international journal}, volume = {55}, journal = {Decision support systems : DSS ; the international journal}, number = {1}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0167-9236}, doi = {10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.049}, pages = {385 -- 398}, year = {2013}, abstract = {fundamental challenge for product-lifecycle management in collaborative value networks is to utilize the vast amount of product information available from heterogeneous sources in order to improve business analytics, decision support, and processes. This becomes even more challenging if those sources are distributed across multiple organizations. Federations of semantic information services, combining service-orientation and semantic technologies, provide a promising solution for this problem. However, without proper measures to establish information security, companies will be reluctant to join an information federation, which could lead to serious adoption barriers. Following the design science paradigm, this paper presents general objectives and a process for designing a secure federation of semantic information services. Furthermore, new as well as established security measures are discussed. Here, our contributions include an access-control enforcement system for semantic information services and a process for modeling access-control policies across organizations. In addition, a comprehensive security architecture is presented. An implementation of the architecture in the context of an application scenario and several performance experiments demonstrate the practical viability of our approach.}, language = {en} } @book{GuentherPetscheFischeretal.2015, author = {G{\"u}nther, Oliver and Petsche, Hans-Joachim and Fischer, Martin H. and Franz, Norbert P. and Steup, Martin and Sixtus, Elena and Heimann, Heinz-Dieter and Pr{\"o}ve, Ralf}, title = {Raum und Zahl im Fokus der Wissenschaften}, series = {Studieren ++ : Konzepte, Perspektiven, Kompetenzen ; 1}, journal = {Studieren ++ : Konzepte, Perspektiven, Kompetenzen ; 1}, editor = {Petsche, Hans-Joachim}, publisher = {Trafo}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-86464-082-7}, pages = {168}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Die nun begonnene Reihe „studieren++" resultiert aus einer von der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam angebotenen Vorlesungsreihe. Das Besondere an dieser Vorlesungsreihe ist der multidisziplin{\"a}re Anspruch und die konsequent umgesetzte Zusammenarbeit {\"u}ber Disziplingrenzen hinweg. Die nicht nur {\"u}ber Instituts-, sondern {\"u}ber Fakult{\"a}tsgrenzen praktizierte Interdisziplinarit{\"a}t erlaubt die Betrachtung eines Problems oder Sachverhalts aus unterschiedlichen Blickwinkeln. Wissenschaftliche Fragestellungen sind komplex und nicht immer auf eine Disziplin beschr{\"a}nkt. Sie in ihrer G{\"a}nze erfassen und nachhaltige L{\"o}sungsstrategien oder Konzepte entwickeln zu k{\"o}nnen gelingt oft nur durch eine multidisziplin{\"a}re Kooperation. Eine Lehrveranstaltung wie die vorliegende ist nicht nur f{\"u}r die Studierenden einer Universit{\"a}t eine hervorragende M{\"o}glichkeit, um {\"u}ber die Grenzen der eigenen Disziplin hinaus zu blicken und die Zusammenarbeit mit Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftlern aus anderen Bereichen zu pflegen. So lernt man, sich in andere Sichtweisen hineinzuversetzen und sich zwischen den Disziplinen zu bewegen - eine Kompetenz, die in der hochkomplexen Arbeitswelt von heute von hohem Nutzen ist. Der vorliegende erste Band der Reihe hat „Raum und Zahl" zum Thema und ist aus einer Ringvorlesung aus dem Wintersemester 2013/2014 entstanden. Drei der f{\"u}nf Fakult{\"a}ten, insgesamt neun Institute der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam, haben sich an der Vorlesung beteiligt und sich dieses spannenden Themas angenommen. Als jemand, der sich jahrelang wissenschaftlich mit algorithmischer Geometrie sowie mit raumbezogenen Datenbanken und Navigationssystemen besch{\"a}ftigt hat, kann ich nur bekr{\"a}ftigen, dass die Bez{\"u}ge zwischen Raum und Zahl, zwischen R{\"a}umen und Zahlen, noch viel st{\"a}rker im {\"o}ffentlichen Bewusstsein verankert geh{\"o}ren. R{\"a}ume auch quantitativ zu erfassen und zu verstehen ist eine Kulturtechnik, die an Wichtigkeit eher noch zunimmt, vor allem vor dem Hintergrund, dass wir genetisch nicht allzu gut auf derartige Herausforderungen vorbereitet sind. Denn viele unserer einschl{\"a}gigen Gene entstammen noch aus der Zeit der Savanne, einer Zeit, zu der das Raumkonzept sich fast ausschließlich auf die unmittelbare r{\"a}umliche Umgebung bezog und Zahlen jenseits von 10 nur wenig Relevanz f{\"u}r das eigene {\"U}berleben hatten. Als Pr{\"a}sident der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam freut es mich ganz besonders, dass sich die hier vertretenen Wissenschaftler bereit erkl{\"a}rt haben, ihre {\"U}berlegungen mit den Studierenden und ihren Kolleginnen und Kollegen zu teilen. Herrn Kollegen Hans-Joachim Petsche m{\"o}chte ich f{\"u}r sein Engagement danken und ihm zu dieser gelungenen Reihe gratulieren. Der Geist der Wissenschaft, der nicht nur einsam im B{\"u}ro oder Labor gelebt wird, sondern gerade an einer Universit{\"a}t auch aktiv nach außen getragen werden sollte, wird hier in besonderer Weise sichtbar. Ich w{\"u}nsche Ihnen viel Freude bei der Lekt{\"u}re des Bandes und freue mich auf weitere Ver{\"o}ffentlichungen in dieser Reihe.}, subject = {Raum}, language = {de} } @article{Guenther2015, author = {G{\"u}nther, Oliver}, title = {Wir sind eine IdeenUni}, series = {Entrepreneurship education : das Potsdamer Modell der Gr{\"u}ndungslehre und -beratung}, journal = {Entrepreneurship education : das Potsdamer Modell der Gr{\"u}ndungslehre und -beratung}, publisher = {BoD}, address = {Norderstedt}, isbn = {978-3-7357-6095-1}, pages = {V -- VI}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @incollection{Guenther2016, author = {G{\"u}nther, Oliver}, title = {Aus dem Geleitwort des Pr{\"a}sidenten der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam zum Er{\"o}ffnungsband der Reihe "studieren++"}, series = {Grenzen im Fokus der Wissenschaften}, booktitle = {Grenzen im Fokus der Wissenschaften}, publisher = {Trafo}, address = {Berlin}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {7 -- 7}, year = {2016}, language = {de} } @incollection{Guenther2022, author = {G{\"u}nther, Oliver}, title = {Lernwelt Hochschule 2030 gestalten}, series = {Lernwelt Hochschule 2030 : Konzepte und Strategien f{\"u}r eine zuk{\"u}nftige Entwicklung}, booktitle = {Lernwelt Hochschule 2030 : Konzepte und Strategien f{\"u}r eine zuk{\"u}nftige Entwicklung}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-11-072922-1}, doi = {10.1515/9783110729221-018}, pages = {227 -- 234}, year = {2022}, language = {de} } @article{KrasnovaVeltriSpengleretal.2013, author = {Krasnova, Hanna and Veltri, Natasha F. and Spengler, Klaus and G{\"u}nther, Oliver}, title = {"Deal of the Day" Platforms what drives Consumer loyalty?}, series = {Business \& information systems engineering : the international journal of Wirtschaftsinformatik}, volume = {5}, journal = {Business \& information systems engineering : the international journal of Wirtschaftsinformatik}, number = {3}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Heidelberg}, issn = {1867-0202}, doi = {10.1007/s12599-013-0268-2}, pages = {165 -- 177}, year = {2013}, abstract = {"Deal of the Day" (DoD) platforms have quickly become popular by offering savings on local services, products and vacations. For merchants, these platforms represent a new marketing channel to advertise their products and services and attract new customers. DoD platform providers, however, struggle to maintaining a stable market share and profitability, because entry and switching costs are low. To sustain a competitive market position, DoD providers are looking for ways to build a loyal customer base. However, research examining the determinants of user loyalty in this novel context is scarce. To fill this gap, this study employs Grounded Theory methodology to develop a conceptual model of customer loyalty to a DoD provider. In the next step, qualitative insights are enriched and validated using quantitative data from a survey of 202 DoD users. The authors find that customer loyalty is in large part driven by monetary incentives, but can be eroded if impressions from merchant encounters are below expectations. In addition, enhancing the share of deals relevant for consumers, i.e. signal-to-noise ratio, and mitigating perceived risks of a transaction emerge as challenges. Beyond theoretical value, the results offer practical insights into how customer loyalty to a DoD provider can be promoted.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{GuentherWinkler2012, author = {G{\"u}nther, Oliver and Winkler, Till J.}, title = {Explaining the governance of software as a service applications}, series = {Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2012 - Tagungsband der MKWI 2012}, booktitle = {Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2012 - Tagungsband der MKWI 2012}, publisher = {Gito}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-942183-63-5}, pages = {599 -- 612}, year = {2012}, abstract = {Defining the allocation of decision rights for enterprise applications is a crucial issue in IT governance and organization design. Today, emerging delivery models such as Software as a Service (SaaS) defy the notion of the internal IT department as the focal point of centralized governance. Recognizing the importance of this issue, we find that the phenomenon of 'SaaS governance' itself is not yet well understood. Based on two cases of SaaS adoption, we take a process-theoretic approach to investigate the complex interaction between factors that influence in the allocation of SaaS authority. The results suggest that some factors, such as the locus of initiative and the decision for SaaS, interact with absorptive capacities and determine the later mode of application governance at a very early stage. Thus, the initiative for introducing SaaS emerges as an important intermediate variable between the overall IT governance mode and the resulting SaaS governance outcome.}, language = {en} } @article{GuenthervanPuttenBrecht2013, author = {G{\"u}nther, Oliver and van Putten, Bart-Jan and Brecht, Franziska}, title = {Challenges in Business Case Development and Requirements for Business Case Frameworks}, series = {Supporting Reuse in Business Case Development}, journal = {Supporting Reuse in Business Case Development}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-658-01170-3}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-658-01171-0_2}, pages = {8 -- 22}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Business cases (BC) are often used to support information systems (IS) investment evaluation. Unfortunately, business case development (BCD) is a complex task, especially identifying and quantifying the benefits of a proposed investment. Although today's business case frameworks (BCF) support BCD to some extent, they have several limitations}, language = {en} } @article{Guenther2012, author = {G{\"u}nther, Oliver}, title = {More politics in the GI - More GI in politics}, series = {Informatik-Spektrum}, volume = {35}, journal = {Informatik-Spektrum}, number = {6}, doi = {10.1007/s00287-012-0657-9}, pages = {397 -- 398}, year = {2012}, language = {en} } @incollection{Guenther, author = {G{\"u}nther, Oliver}, title = {Grußwort}, series = {Voltaire-Preis 2019 f{\"u}r Toleranz, V{\"o}lkerverst{\"a}ndigung und Respekt vor Differenz}, booktitle = {Voltaire-Preis 2019 f{\"u}r Toleranz, V{\"o}lkerverst{\"a}ndigung und Respekt vor Differenz}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {7}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{SchoendienstKulzerGuenther2012, author = {Sch{\"o}ndienst, Valentin and Kulzer, Florian and G{\"u}nther, Oliver}, title = {Like versus dislike}, series = {International Conference on Information Systems : (ICIS 2012)}, booktitle = {International Conference on Information Systems : (ICIS 2012)}, publisher = {Curran}, address = {Red Hook}, pages = {439 -- 454}, year = {2012}, abstract = {As Facebook's Like-button has become ubiquitous, it is the purpose of this research to investigate (1) whether Likes serve as a signal of a product's or service's quality and (2) how the introduction of a Dislike-button would alter perceptions. Following a qualitative study, we conducted an experiment in which 653 participants were presented with website screenshots featuring varying levels of Likes and Dislikes. The results indicate that the theoretical framing of Likes as a Signal is valid and that people do perceive the quality of products and services as superior when they are associated with more Likes. Signaling also explains the counter-intuitive finding that Dislikes can have a positive effect on people's quality perceptions. Results are discussed with respect to theory and practical implications.}, language = {en} } @article{Guenther2013, author = {G{\"u}nther, Oliver}, title = {Vorwort}, isbn = {978-3-941880-75-7}, year = {2013}, language = {de} } @article{FabianKunzKonnegenetal.2012, author = {Fabian, Benjamin and Kunz, Steffen and Konnegen, Marcel and M{\"u}ller, Sebastian and G{\"u}nther, Oliver}, title = {Access control for semantic data federations in industrial product-lifecycle management}, series = {Computers in industry : an international, application oriented research journal}, volume = {63}, journal = {Computers in industry : an international, application oriented research journal}, number = {9}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0166-3615}, doi = {10.1016/j.compind.2012.08.015}, pages = {930 -- 940}, year = {2012}, abstract = {Information integration across company borders becomes increasingly important for the success of product lifecycle management in industry and complex supply chains. Semantic technologies are about to play a crucial role in this integrative process. However, cross-company data exchange requires mechanisms to enable fine-grained access control definition and enforcement, preventing unauthorized leakage of confidential data across company borders. Currently available semantic repositories are not sufficiently equipped to satisfy this important requirement. This paper presents an infrastructure for controlled sharing of semantic data between cooperating business partners. First, we motivate the need for access control in semantic data federations by a case study in the industrial service sector. Furthermore, we present an architecture for controlling access to semantic repositories that is based on our newly developed SemForce security service. Finally, we show the practical feasibility of this architecture by an implementation and several performance experiments.}, language = {en} } @article{WinklerGoebelBidaultetal.2012, author = {Winkler, Till J. and Goebel, Christoph and Bidault, Francis and G{\"u}nther, Oliver}, title = {Information technology and business practieses in Germany}, series = {The UCLA Anderson Business and Information Technologies (BIT) Project}, journal = {The UCLA Anderson Business and Information Technologies (BIT) Project}, publisher = {world scientific}, address = {Singapore}, doi = {10.1142/9789814390880_0005}, pages = {81 -- 114}, year = {2012}, language = {en} } @article{GuentherBrechtEckhardtetal.2012, author = {G{\"u}nther, Oliver and Brecht, Franziska and Eckhardt, Andreas and Berger, Christian}, title = {Corporate career presences on social network sites: an analysis of hedonic and utilitarian value}, series = {CHI '12 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems}, journal = {CHI '12 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems}, publisher = {ACM}, address = {Texas}, isbn = {978-1-4503-1015-4}, doi = {10.1145/2207676.2208408}, pages = {2441 -- 2450}, year = {2012}, abstract = {Due to the shortage of skilled workforce and the increasing usage of social network sites, companies increasingly apply social network sites to attract potential applicants. This paper explores how corporate career presences on network sites should be realized in order to attract potential applicants. Therefore, we tested the impact of seven individual characteristics (namely Appointments, Daily Working Routine, Jobs, Corporate News, Entertainment, Media Format, and Features) of these corporate career presences that we extracted by a comprehensive pre-study on users' perceived hedonic and utilitarian value of these presences on social network sites. Based on an online survey with 470 participants, the results reveal a highly significant impact of five characteristics that corporate career presences provide both a hedonic as well as a utilitarian value to the user}, language = {en} } @article{GuentherLeopoldMendling2016, author = {G{\"u}nther, Oliver and Leopold, Henrik and Mendling, Jan}, title = {Learning from quality issues of BPMN models from industry}, series = {CEUR Workshop Proceedings}, volume = {1701}, journal = {CEUR Workshop Proceedings}, issn = {1613-0073}, pages = {36 -- 38}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Many organizations use business process models for documenting their business operations. In recent years, the Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) evolved into the leading standard for process modeling. However, BPMN is complex: The specification offers a huge variety of different elements and often several representational choices for the same semantics. This raises the question of how well modelers can deal with these choices. Empirical insights into BPMN usage from the perspective of practitioners are still missing. We close this gap by analyzing a large set of BPMN 2.0 process models from practice. We found that particularly representational choices for splits and joins, the correct use of message flow, the proper decomposition of models, and the consistent labeling appear to be connected with quality issues. Based on our findings we give five recommendations how these issues can be avoided in the future. The work summarized in this extended abstract has been published in [LMG16].}, language = {en} } @article{GuentherLeopoldMendling2016, author = {G{\"u}nther, Oliver and Leopold, Henrik and Mendling, Jan}, title = {Learning from quality issues of BPMN models from industry}, series = {IEEE Software}, volume = {33}, journal = {IEEE Software}, number = {4}, publisher = {Inst. of Electr. and Electronics Engineers}, address = {Los Alamitos}, issn = {0740-7459}, doi = {10.1109/MS.2015.81}, pages = {26 -- 33}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Many organizations use business process models to document business operations and formalize business requirements in software-engineering projects. The Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), a specification by the Object Management Group, has evolved into the leading standard for process modeling. One challenge is BPMN's complexity: it offers a huge variety of elements and often several representational choices for the same semantics. This raises the question of how well modelers can deal with these choices. Empirical insights into BPMN use from the practitioners' perspective are still missing. To close this gap, researchers analyzed 585 BPMN 2.0 process models from six companies. They found that split and join representations, message flow, the lack of proper model decomposition, and labeling related to quality issues. They give five specific recommendations on how to avoid these issues.}, language = {en} }