@article{MarggrafLindeckeVoigtetal.2023,
  author    = {Marggraf, Lara Christin and Lindecke, Oliver and Voigt, Christian C. and Pētersons, Gunārs and Voigt-Heucke, Silke Luise},
  title     = {Nathusius' bats, Pipistrellus nathusii, bypass mating opportunities of their own species, but respond to foraging heterospecifics on migratory transit flights},
  series = {Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution},
  publisher = {Frontiers},
  address   = {Lausanne, Schweiz},
  issn      = {2296-701X},
  doi       = {10.3389/fevo.2022.908560},
  pages     = {1 -- 10},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {In late summer, migratory bats of the temperate zone face the challenge of accomplishing two energy-demanding tasks almost at the same time: migration and mating. Both require information and involve search efforts, such as localizing prey or finding potential mates. In non-migrating bat species, playback studies showed that listening to vocalizations of other bats, both con-and heterospecifics, may help a recipient bat to find foraging patches and mating sites. However, we are still unaware of the degree to which migrating bats depend on con-or heterospecific vocalizations for identifying potential feeding or mating opportunities during nightly transit flights. Here, we investigated the vocal responses of Nathusius' pipistrelle bats, Pipistrellus nathusii, to simulated feeding and courtship aggregations at a coastal migration corridor. We presented migrating bats either feeding buzzes or courtship calls of their own or a heterospecific migratory species, the common noctule, Nyctalus noctula. We expected that during migratory transit flights, simulated feeding opportunities would be particularly attractive to bats, as well as simulated mating opportunities which may indicate suitable roosts for a stopover. However, we found that when compared to the natural silence of both pre-and post-playback phases, bats called indifferently during the playback of conspecific feeding sounds, whereas P. nathusii echolocation call activity increased during simulated feeding of N. noctula. In contrast, the call activity of P. nathusii decreased during the playback of conspecific courtship calls, while no response could be detected when heterospecific call types were broadcasted. Our results suggest that while on migratory transits, P. nathusii circumnavigate conspecific mating aggregations, possibly to save time or to reduce the risks associated with social interactions where aggression due to territoriality might be expected. This avoidance behavior could be a result of optimization strategies by P. nathusii when performing long-distance migratory flights, and it could also explain the lack of a response to simulated conspecific feeding. However, the observed increase of activity in response to simulated feeding of N. noctula, suggests that P. nathusii individuals may be eavesdropping on other aerial hawking insectivorous species during migration, especially if these occupy a slightly different foraging niche.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ReedSchenck2023,
  author    = {Reed, Kate and Schenck, Marcia C.},
  title     = {A right to research?},
  series = {International migration},
  volume    = {61},
  journal   = {International migration},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0020-7985},
  doi       = {https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13145},
  pages     = {390 -- 393},
  year      = {2023},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JessenSpiessWaightsetal.2023,
  author    = {Jessen, Jonas and Spiess, C. Katharina and Waights, Sevrin and Wrohlich, Katharina},
  title     = {The gender division of unpaid care work throughout the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany},
  series = {German economic review},
  volume    = {23},
  journal   = {German economic review},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {1465-6485},
  doi       = {10.1515/ger-2022-0003},
  pages     = {641 -- 667},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {The COVID-19 pandemic and related closures of day care centres and schools significantly increased the amount of care work done by parents. There has been much speculation over whether the pandemic increased or decreased gender equality in parental care work. Based on representative data for Germany from spring 2020 and winter 2021 we present an empirical analysis that shows that although gender inequality in the division of care work increased to some extent in the beginning of the pandemic, it returned to the pre-pandemic level in the second lockdown almost nine months later. These results suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic neither aggravated nor lessened inequality in the division of unpaid care work among mothers and fathers in any persistent way in Germany.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{MarggrafLindeckeVoigtetal.2023,
  author    = {Marggraf, Lara Christin and Lindecke, Oliver and Voigt, Christian C. and Pētersons, Gunārs and Voigt-Heucke, Silke Luise},
  title     = {Nathusius' bats, Pipistrellus nathusii, bypass mating opportunities of their own species, but respond to foraging heterospecifics on migratory transit flights},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {1306},
  issn      = {1866-8372},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-57957},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-579574},
  pages     = {10},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {In late summer, migratory bats of the temperate zone face the challenge of accomplishing two energy-demanding tasks almost at the same time: migration and mating. Both require information and involve search efforts, such as localizing prey or finding potential mates. In non-migrating bat species, playback studies showed that listening to vocalizations of other bats, both con-and heterospecifics, may help a recipient bat to find foraging patches and mating sites. However, we are still unaware of the degree to which migrating bats depend on con-or heterospecific vocalizations for identifying potential feeding or mating opportunities during nightly transit flights. Here, we investigated the vocal responses of Nathusius' pipistrelle bats, Pipistrellus nathusii, to simulated feeding and courtship aggregations at a coastal migration corridor. We presented migrating bats either feeding buzzes or courtship calls of their own or a heterospecific migratory species, the common noctule, Nyctalus noctula. We expected that during migratory transit flights, simulated feeding opportunities would be particularly attractive to bats, as well as simulated mating opportunities which may indicate suitable roosts for a stopover. However, we found that when compared to the natural silence of both pre-and post-playback phases, bats called indifferently during the playback of conspecific feeding sounds, whereas P. nathusii echolocation call activity increased during simulated feeding of N. noctula. In contrast, the call activity of P. nathusii decreased during the playback of conspecific courtship calls, while no response could be detected when heterospecific call types were broadcasted. Our results suggest that while on migratory transits, P. nathusii circumnavigate conspecific mating aggregations, possibly to save time or to reduce the risks associated with social interactions where aggression due to territoriality might be expected. This avoidance behavior could be a result of optimization strategies by P. nathusii when performing long-distance migratory flights, and it could also explain the lack of a response to simulated conspecific feeding. However, the observed increase of activity in response to simulated feeding of N. noctula, suggests that P. nathusii individuals may be eavesdropping on other aerial hawking insectivorous species during migration, especially if these occupy a slightly different foraging niche.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KohlerPost2023,
  author    = {Kohler, Ulrich and Post, Julia C.},
  title     = {Welcher Zweck heiligt die Mittel?},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie},
  volume    = {52},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {de Gruyter},
  address   = {Oldenburg},
  issn      = {2366-0325},
  doi       = {10.1515/zfsoz-2023-2001},
  pages     = {67 -- 88},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Im Vergleich zu Umfragen an Wahrscheinlichkeitsstichproben bieten Umfragen an Access-Panels, die auf Nicht-Wahrscheinlichkeitsstichproben basieren, unbestreitbare wirtschaftliche Vorteile. Diese Vorteile gehen jedoch mit unvermeidbaren Qualit{\"a}tseinbußen einher, die auch dann bestehen bleiben, wenn Erstere sehr niedrige Responseraten haben. Daher m{\"u}ssen die wirtschaftlichen Vorteile und die methodischen Einschr{\"a}nkungen gegeneinander abgewogen werden. Es wird argumentiert, dass diese Abw{\"a}gung anhand normativer Festlegungen erfolgen muss. Unter Anwendung der hier vorgeschlagenen Maßst{\"a}be kommt der Beitrag zu dem Schluss, dass die Qualit{\"a}tsanspr{\"u}che an {\"u}ber Massenmedien verbreitete Meinungsumfragen h{\"o}her sein sollten als f{\"u}r rein (sozial)wissenschaftliche Zwecke.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KohlerPost2023,
  author    = {Kohler, Ulrich and Post, Julia C.},
  title     = {Pulp Science?},
  series = {Gesellschaft, Wirtschaft, Politik : GWP : Sozialwissenschaften f{\"u}r politische Bildung},
  volume    = {72},
  journal   = {Gesellschaft, Wirtschaft, Politik : GWP : Sozialwissenschaften f{\"u}r politische Bildung},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Budrich},
  address   = {Leverkusen},
  issn      = {2196-1654},
  doi       = {10.3224/gwp.v72i4.09},
  pages     = {475 -- 483},
  year      = {2023},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{WetzelReedSchenck2023,
  author    = {Wetzel, Johanna M. and Reed, Kate and Schenck, Marcia C.},
  title     = {"Writing with my professors"},
  series = {Writing Together: Kollaboratives Schreiben mit Personen aus dem Feld},
  volume    = {45},
  booktitle = {Writing Together: Kollaboratives Schreiben mit Personen aus dem Feld},
  publisher = {Transcript Verlag},
  address   = {Bielefeld},
  isbn      = {978-3-8394-6399-4},
  doi       = {10.14361/9783839463994-002},
  pages     = {31 -- 53},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Kollaboratives Forschen quer zu hegemonialen Wissensordnungen gilt als wichtiger Baustein dekolonialer Wissenspraxis. Gemeinsame Schreibprozesse von Wissenschaftler*innen und ihren nicht-wissenschaftlichen Forschungspartner*innen sind allerdings selten und eine methodologische und forschungspraktische Reflexion fehlt. Die Beitr{\"a}ger*innen widmen sich diesen L{\"u}cken, indem sie erfolgreiche, aber auch gescheiterte Projekte kollaborativer Textproduktion zwischen Universit{\"a}t und Feld vorstellen und auf ihr Potenzial als transformative und dekoloniale Wissenspraxis befragen. So entsteht eine praktische Orientierungshilfe, die gleichzeitig die interdisziplin{\"a}re Diskussion anregt.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Haenel2023,
  author    = {H{\"a}nel, Hilkje C.},
  title     = {Germany's silence: testimonial injustice in the NSU investigation and willful ignorance in the NSU trial},
  series = {Constellations : an international journal of critical and democratic theory},
  journal   = {Constellations : an international journal of critical and democratic theory},
  publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {1351-0487},
  doi       = {10.1111/1467-8675.12703},
  pages     = {1 -- 16},
  year      = {2023},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Haenel2023,
  author    = {H{\"a}nel, Hilkje C.},
  title     = {(Moralisch) guter Sex},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Praktische Philosophie},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Praktische Philosophie},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Salzburg},
  address   = {Salzburg},
  issn      = {2409-9961},
  doi       = {10.22613/zfpp/9.2.2},
  pages     = {49 -- 78},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {In einem k{\"u}rzlich erschienenen Artikel argumentiert Almut v. Wedelstaedt {\"u}berzeugend, warum Zustimmung zwar „die Bedingung f{\"u}r die Legitimation von Sex" ist (2020, 127), dass die moralische G{\"u}te von Sex aber nur dann einzusch{\"a}tzen ist, wenn wir darauf achten, ob die Beteiligten der Handlung sich auf Augenh{\"o}he begegnen. Die Idee ist: Es gibt legitime sexuelle Handlungen, die moralisch gut sind, und es gibt legitime sexuelle Handlungen, die moralisch besser sind. Hier m{\"o}chte ich die Idee des besseren Sexes genauer ausloten. W{\"a}hrend v. Wedelstaedt von moralisch gelungenem Sex spricht und somit auf der Ebene der moralischen Bewertung von Sex bleibt, m{\"o}chte ich die Frage danach stellen, was Sex qualitativ gut macht. Tats{\"a}chlich wird in der Zustimmungsdebatte meist davon ausgegangen, dass diese zwei Fragen wenig gemeinsam haben; ob eine sexuelle Handlung legitim ist, hat zun{\"a}chst nichts damit zu tun, ob diese auch gut ist. Ich werde drei Argumente liefern, warum wir legitimen Sex und qualitativ guten Sex zusammen betrachten sollten - und es wird sich zeigen, dass die gegenw{\"a}rtige philosophische und rechtstheoretische Debatte Zustimmung verk{\"u}rzt diskutiert und daher alleingenommen wenig hilfreich ist, stattdessen ben{\"o}tigt die Zustimmungsdebatte auch eine Untersuchung von qualitativ gutem Sex.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HaenelHaslangerKroeger2023,
  author    = {H{\"a}nel, Hilkje C. and Haslanger, Sally and Kroeger, Odin},
  title     = {Analyzing social wrongs},
  series = {Journal of social philosophy},
  volume    = {53},
  journal   = {Journal of social philosophy},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Hoboken, NJ},
  issn      = {0047-2786},
  doi       = {10.1111/josp.12505},
  pages     = {448 -- 453},
  year      = {2023},
  language  = {en}
}