@article{DoebbelingHildebrandtMierschKhannaetal.2024,
  author    = {D{\"o}bbeling-Hildebrandt, Niklas and Miersch, Klaas and Khanna, Tarun M. and Bachelet, Marion and Bruns, Stephan B. and Callaghan, Max and Edenhofer, Ottmar and Flachsland, Christian and Forster, Piers M. and Kalkuhl, Matthias and Koch, Nicolas and Lamb, William F. and Ohlendorf, Nils and Steckel, Jan Christoph and Minx, Jan C.},
  title     = {Systematic review and meta-analysis of ex-post evaluations on the effectiveness of carbon pricing},
  series = {Nature communications},
  volume    = {15},
  journal   = {Nature communications},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Springer Nature},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {2041-1723},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41467-024-48512-w},
  pages     = {12},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Today, more than 70 carbon pricing schemes have been implemented around the globe, but their contributions to emissions reductions remains a subject of heated debate in science and policy. Here we assess the effectiveness of carbon pricing in reducing emissions using a rigorous, machine-learning assisted systematic review and meta-analysis. Based on 483 effect sizes extracted from 80 causal ex-post evaluations across 21 carbon pricing schemes, we find that introducing a carbon price has yielded immediate and substantial emission reductions for at least 17 of these policies, despite the low level of prices in most instances. Statistically significant emissions reductions range between -5\% to -21\% across the schemes (-4\% to -15\% after correcting for publication bias). Our study highlights critical evidence gaps with regard to dozens of unevaluated carbon pricing schemes and the price elasticity of emissions reductions. More rigorous synthesis of carbon pricing and other climate policies is required across a range of outcomes to advance our understanding of "what works" and accelerate learning on climate solutions in science and policy.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BiermannNowakBraunetal.2024,
  author    = {Biermann, Kaija and Nowak, Bianca and Braun, Lea-Marie and Taddicken, Monika and Kr{\"a}mer, Nicole C. and Stieglitz, Stefan},
  title     = {Does scientific evidence sell?},
  series = {Science communication},
  volume    = {0},
  journal   = {Science communication},
  publisher = {Sage},
  address   = {Thousand Oaks, Calif.},
  issn      = {1075-5470},
  doi       = {10.1177/10755470241249468},
  pages     = {34},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Examining the dissemination of evidence on social media, we analyzed the discourse around eight visible scientists in the context of COVID-19. Using manual (N = 1,406) and automated coding (N = 42,640) on an account-based tracked Twitter/X dataset capturing scientists' activities and eliciting reactions over six 2-week periods, we found that visible scientists' tweets included more scientific evidence. However, public reactions contained more anecdotal evidence. Findings indicate that evidence can be a message characteristic leading to greater tweet dissemination. Implications for scientists, including explicitly incorporating scientific evidence in their communication and examining evidence in science communication research, are discussed.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Behrmann,
  author    = {Behrmann, G{\"u}nter C.},
  title     = {Politische Erziehung und Bildung im Kaiserreich},
  series = {Konzeptionen, Strategien und Inhaltsfelder politischer Bildung},
  journal   = {Konzeptionen, Strategien und Inhaltsfelder politischer Bildung},
  publisher = {Schneider Verlag Hohengehren GmbH},
  address   = {Baltmannsweiler},
  isbn      = {978-3-8340-1725-3},
  pages     = {24 -- 35},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Behrmann,
  author    = {Behrmann, G{\"u}nter C.},
  title     = {Soziales Lernen},
  series = {Konzeptionen, Strategien und Inhaltsfelder politischer Bildung},
  journal   = {Konzeptionen, Strategien und Inhaltsfelder politischer Bildung},
  publisher = {Schneider Verlag Hohengehren GmbH},
  address   = {Baltmannsweiler},
  isbn      = {978-3-8340-1725-3},
  pages     = {540 -- 559},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BehrmannOverwien,
  author    = {Behrmann, G{\"u}nter C. and Overwien, Bernd},
  title     = {Globales Lernen},
  series = {Konzeptionen, Strategien und Inhaltsfelder politischer Bildung},
  journal   = {Konzeptionen, Strategien und Inhaltsfelder politischer Bildung},
  publisher = {Schneider Verlag Hohengehren GmbH},
  address   = {Baltmannsweiler},
  isbn      = {978-3-8340-1725-3},
  pages     = {663 -- 666},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{SariatiHammamiZouhaletal.,
  author    = {Sariati, Dorsaf and Hammami, Raouf and Zouhal, Hassane and Clark, Cain Craig Truman and Nebigh, Ammar and Chtara, Moktar and Chortane, Sabri Gaied and Hackney, Anthony C. and Souissi, Nizar and Granacher, Urs and Ben Ounis, Omar},
  title     = {Improvement of Physical Performance Following a 6 Week Change-of-Direction Training Program in Elite Youth Soccer Players of Different Maturity Levels},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1866-8364},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-54101},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-541019},
  pages     = {1 -- 8},
  abstract  = {Background: Change-of-direction (CoD) is a necessary physical ability of a field sport and may vary in youth players according to their maturation status. Objectives: The aim of this study is: to compare the effectiveness of a 6-week CoD training intervention on dynamic balance (CS-YBT), horizontal jump (5JT), speed (10 and 30-m linear sprint times), CoD with (15 m-CoD + B) and without (15 m-CoD) the ball, in youth male soccer players at different levels of maturity [pre- and post-peak height velocity (PHV)]. Materials and Methods: Thirty elite male youth soccer players aged 10-17 years from the Tunisian first division participated in this study. The players were divided into pre- (G1, n = 15) and post-PHV (G2, n = 15) groups. Both groups completed a similar 6-week training program with two sessions per week of four CoD exercises. All players completed the following tests before and after intervention: CS-YBT; 5 JT; 10, 30, and 15 m-CoD; and 15 m-CoD + B, and data were analyzed using ANCOVA. Results: All 30 players completed the study according to the study design and methodology. Adherence rate was 100\% across all groups, and no training or test-related injuries were reported. Pre-PHV and post-PHV groups showed significant amelioration post-intervention for all dependent variables (after test > before test; p < 0.01, d = 0.09-1.51). ANOVA revealed a significant group × time interaction only for CS-YBT (F = 4.45; p < 0.04; η2 = 0.14), 5JT (F = 6.39; p < 0.02; η2 = 0.18), and 15 m-CoD (F = 7.88; p < 0.01; η2 = 0.22). CS-YBT, 5JT, and 15 m-CoD improved significantly in the post-PHV group (+ 4.56\%, effect size = 1.51; + 4.51\%, effect size = 1.05; and -3.08\%, effect size = 0.51, respectively), more than the pre-PHV group (+ 2.77\%, effect size = 0.85; + 2.91\%, effect size = 0.54; and -1.56\%, effect size = 0.20, respectively). Conclusion: The CoD training program improved balance, horizontal jump, and CoD without the ball in male preadolescent and adolescent soccer players, and this improvement was greater in the post-PHV players. The maturity status of the athletes should be considered when programming CoD training for soccer players.},
  language  = {en}
}