@article{NeelmeijerMotaghBookhagen2017,
  author    = {Neelmeijer, Julia and Motagh, Mandi and Bookhagen, Bodo},
  title     = {High-resolution digital elevation models from single-pass TanDEM-X interferometry over mountainous regions: A case study of Inylchek Glacier, Central Asia},
  series = {ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing : official publication of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing},
  volume    = {130},
  journal   = {ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing : official publication of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0924-2716},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.05.011},
  pages     = {108 -- 121},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {This study demonstrates the potential of using single-pass TanDEM-X (TDX) radar imagery to analyse inter- and intra-annual glacier changes in mountainous terrain. Based on SAR images acquired in February 2012, March 2013 and November 2013 over the Inylchek Glacier, Kyrgyzstan, we discuss in detail the processing steps required to generate three reliable digital elevation models (DEMs) with a spatial resolution of 10 m that can be used for glacial mass balance studies. We describe the interferometric processing steps and the influence of a priori elevation information that is required to model long wavelength topographic effects. We also focus on DEM alignment to allow optimal DEM comparisons and on the effects of radar signal penetration on ice and snow surface elevations. We finally compare glacier elevation changes between the three TDX DEMs and the C-band shuttle radar topography mission (SRTM) DEM from February 2000. We introduce a new approach for glacier elevation change calculations that depends on the elevation and slope of the terrain. We highlight the superior quality of the TDX DEMs compared to the SRTM DEM, describe remaining DEM uncertainties and discuss the limitations that arise due to the side-looking nature of the radar sensor. (C) 2017 International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Inc. (ISPRS). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{PenaMetzgerHeidbachetal.2022,
  author    = {Pe{\~n}a, Carlos and Metzger, Sabrina and Heidbach, Oliver and Bedford, Jonathan and Bookhagen, Bodo and Moreno, Marcos and Oncken, Onno and Cotton, Fabrice},
  title     = {Role of poroelasticity during the early postseismic deformation of the 2010 Maule megathrust earthquake},
  series = {Geophysical research letters},
  volume    = {49},
  journal   = {Geophysical research letters},
  number    = {9},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Hoboken, NJ},
  issn      = {0094-8276},
  doi       = {10.1029/2022GL098144},
  pages     = {11},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Megathrust earthquakes impose changes of differential stress and pore pressure in the lithosphere-asthenosphere system that are transiently relaxed during the postseismic period primarily due to afterslip, viscoelastic and poroelastic processes. Especially during the early postseismic phase, however, the relative contribution of these processes to the observed surface deformation is unclear. To investigate this, we use geodetic data collected in the first 48 days following the 2010 Maule earthquake and a poro-viscoelastic forward model combined with an afterslip inversion. This model approach fits the geodetic data 14\% better than a pure elastic model. Particularly near the region of maximum coseismic slip, the predicted surface poroelastic uplift pattern explains well the observations. If poroelasticity is neglected, the spatial afterslip distribution is locally altered by up to +/- 40\%. Moreover, we find that shallow crustal aftershocks mostly occur in regions of increased postseismic pore-pressure changes, indicating that both processes might be mechanically coupled.},
  language  = {en}
}