@article{SchwingshacklRuzanskaAntonetal.2018,
  author    = {Schwingshackl, Lukas and Ruzanska, Ulrike Alexandra and Anton, Verena and Wallroth, Raphael and Ohla, Kathrin and Knueppel, Sven and Schulze, Matthias Bernd and Pischon, Tobias and Deutschbein, Johannes and Schenk, Liane and Warschburger, Petra and Harttig, Ulrich and Boeing, Heiner and Bergmann, Manuela M.},
  title     = {The NutriAct Family Study: a web-based prospective study on the epidemiological, psychological and sociological basis of food choice},
  series = {BMC public health},
  volume    = {18},
  journal   = {BMC public health},
  publisher = {BMC},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1471-2458},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12889-018-5814-x},
  pages     = {12},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Background: Most studies on food choice have been focussing on the individual level but familial aspects may also play an important role. This paper reports of a novel study that will focus on the familial aspects of the formation of food choice among men and women aged 50-70 years by recruiting spouses and siblings (NutriAct Family Study; NFS). Discussion: Until August 4th 2017, 4783 EPIC-Participants were contacted by mail of which 446 persons recruited 2 to 5 family members (including themselves) resulting in 1032 participants, of whom 82\% had started answering or already completed the questionnaires. Of the 4337 remaining EPIC-participants who had been contacted, 1040 (24\%) did not respond at all, and 3297 (76\%) responded but declined, in 51\% of the cases because of the request to recruit at least 2 family members in the respective age range. The developed recruitment procedures and web-based methods of data collection are capable to generate the required study population including the data on individual and inter-personal determinants which will be linkable to food choice. The information on familial links among the study participants will show the role of familial traits in midlife for the adoption of food choices supporting healthy aging.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{GalbeteSchwingshacklSchwedhelmetal.2018,
  author    = {Galbete, Cecilia and Schwingshackl, Lukas and Schwedhelm, Carolina and Boeing, Heiner and Schulze, Matthias Bernd},
  title     = {Evaluating Mediterranean diet and risk of chronic disease in cohort studies},
  series = {European journal of epidemiology},
  volume    = {33},
  journal   = {European journal of epidemiology},
  number    = {10},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Dordrecht},
  issn      = {0393-2990},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10654-018-0427-3},
  pages     = {909 -- 931},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Several meta-analyses have been published summarizing the associations of the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) with chronic diseases. We evaluated the quality and credibility of evidence from these meta-analyses as well as characterized the different indices used to define MedDiet and re-calculated the associations with the different indices identified. We conducted an umbrella review of meta-analyses on cohort studies evaluating the association of the MedDiet with type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer and cognitive-related diseases. We used the AMSTAR (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews) checklist to evaluate the methodological quality of the meta-analyses, and the NutriGrade scoring system to evaluate the credibility of evidence. We also identified different indices used to define MedDiet; tests for subgroup differences were performed to compare the associations with the different indices when at least 2 studies were available for different definitions. Fourteen publications were identified and within them 27 meta-analyses which were based on 70 primary studies. Almost all meta-analyses reported inverse associations between MedDiet and risk of chronic disease, but the credibility of evidence was rated low to moderate. Moreover, substantial heterogeneity was observed on the use of the indices assessing adherence to the MedDiet, but two indices were the most used ones [Trichopoulou MedDiet (tMedDiet) and alternative MedDiet (aMedDiet)]. Overall, we observed little difference in risk associations comparing different MedDiet indices in the subgroup meta-analyses. Future prospective cohort studies are advised to use more homogenous definitions of the MedDiet to improve the comparability across meta-analyses.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GalbeteKroegerJannaschetal.2018,
  author    = {Galbete, Cecilia and Kr{\"o}ger, Janine and Jannasch, Franziska and Iqbal, Khalid and Schwingshackl, Lukas and Schwedhelm, Carolina and Weikert, Cornelia and Boeing, Heiner and Schulze, Matthias Bernd},
  title     = {Nordic diet, Mediterranean diet, and the risk of chronic diseases},
  series = {BMC Medicine},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {BMC Medicine},
  publisher = {BMC},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1741-7015},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12916-018-1082-y},
  pages     = {13},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Background: The Mediterranean Diet (MedDiet) has been acknowledged as a healthy diet. However, its relation with risk of major chronic diseases in non-Mediterranean countries is inconclusive. The Nordic diet is proposed as an alternative across Northern Europe, although its associations with the risk of chronic diseases remain controversial. We aimed to investigate the association between the Nordic diet and the MedDiet with the risk of chronic disease (type 2 diabetes (T2D), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and cancer) in the EPIC-Potsdam cohort. Methods: The EPIC-Potsdam cohort recruited 27,548 participants between 1994 and 1998. After exclusion of prevalent cases, we evaluated baseline adherence to a score reflecting the Nordic diet and two MedDiet scores (tMDS, reflecting the traditional MedDiet score, and the MedPyr score, reflecting the MedDiet Pyramid). Cox regression models were applied to examine the association between the diet scores and the incidence of major chronic diseases. Results: During a follow-up of 10.6 years, 1376 cases of T2D, 312 of MI, 321 of stroke, and 1618 of cancer were identified. The Nordic diet showed a statistically non-significant inverse association with incidence of MI in the overall population and of stroke in men. Adherence to the MedDiet was associated with lower incidence of T2D (HR per 1 SD 0.93, 95\% CI 0.88-0.98 for the tMDS score and 0.92, 0.87-0.97 for the MedPyr score). In women, the MedPyr score was also inversely associated with MI. No association was observed for any of the scores with cancer. Conclusions: In the EPIC-Potsdam cohort, the Nordic diet showed a possible beneficial effect on MI in the overall population and for stroke in men, while both scores reflecting the MedDiet conferred lower risk of T2D in the overall population and of MI in women.},
  language  = {en}
}