@misc{LuethWulf1997, author = {L{\"u}th, Christoph and Wulf, Christoph}, title = {Vorwort}, isbn = {3-89271-757-5}, year = {1997}, language = {de} } @misc{LuethKeckWiersing1996, author = {L{\"u}th, Christoph and Keck, Rudolf W. and Wiersing, Erhard}, title = {Vorwort}, year = {1996}, language = {de} } @misc{Dittberner1994, author = {Dittberner, J{\"u}rgen}, title = {Vorwort}, year = {1994}, language = {de} } @misc{ReimoldSchulzHoffmannetal.2016, author = {Reimold, W. U. and Schulz, Toni and Hoffmann, M. and Wannek, Dshamilja and Hauser, N. and van Acken, David and Luguet, A.}, title = {VREDEFORT GRANOPHYRE GENESIS: CLUES FROM RE-OS ISOTOPE DATA}, series = {Physical review : E, Statistical, nonlinear and soft matter physics}, volume = {51}, journal = {Physical review : E, Statistical, nonlinear and soft matter physics}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {1086-9379}, pages = {A533 -- A533}, year = {2016}, language = {en} } @misc{Muster2024, author = {Muster, Judith}, title = {Wenn Regeln die Interaktion blockieren}, series = {Neues Lernen : Personal.magazin : Inspiration f{\"u}r die Entwicklung von Mensch und Organisation}, volume = {37}, journal = {Neues Lernen : Personal.magazin : Inspiration f{\"u}r die Entwicklung von Mensch und Organisation}, number = {1}, publisher = {Haufe-Lexware GmbH \& Co. KG}, address = {Freiburg}, issn = {2941-3028}, pages = {39 -- 39}, year = {2024}, language = {de} } @misc{Rothermel2022, author = {Rothermel, Ann-Kathrin}, title = {What anti-gender and anti-vaccines politics have in common}, publisher = {London School of Economics and Political Science}, address = {London}, year = {2022}, language = {en} } @misc{TeusnerMatthiesStaubitz2018, author = {Teusner, Ralf and Matthies, Christoph and Staubitz, Thomas}, title = {What Stays in Mind?}, series = {IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)}, journal = {IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)}, publisher = {IEEE}, address = {New York}, isbn = {978-1-5386-1174-6}, issn = {0190-5848}, doi = {10.1109/FIE.2018.8658890}, pages = {9}, year = {2018}, language = {en} } @misc{RappKlugePenkaetal.2015, author = {Rapp, Michael A. and Kluge, Ulrike and Penka, Simone and Vardar, Azra and Aichberger, Marion Christina and Mundt, Adrian P. and Schouler-Ocak, Meryam and M{\"o}sko, Mike and Butler, Jeffrey and Meyer-Lindenberg, Andreas and Heinz, Andreas}, title = {When local poverty is more important than your income: Mental health in minorities in inner cities}, series = {World psychiatry}, volume = {14}, journal = {World psychiatry}, number = {2}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {1723-8617}, doi = {10.1002/wps.20221}, pages = {249 -- 250}, year = {2015}, language = {en} } @misc{GieblerRuthTanneberg2018, author = {Giebler, Heiko and Ruth, Saskia P. and Tanneberg, Dag}, title = {Why choice matters}, series = {Politics and Governance}, volume = {6}, journal = {Politics and Governance}, number = {1}, publisher = {Cogitatio Press}, address = {Lisbon}, issn = {2183-2463}, doi = {10.17645/pag.v6i1.1428}, pages = {1 -- 10}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Measures of democracy are in high demand. Scientific and public audiences use them to describe political realities and to substantiate causal claims about those realities. This introduction to the thematic issue reviews the history of democracy measurement since the 1950s. It identifies four development phases of the field, which are characterized by three recurrent topics of debate: (1) what is democracy, (2) what is a good measure of democracy, and (3) do our measurements of democracy register real-world developments? As the answers to those questions have been changing over time, the field of democracy measurement has adapted and reached higher levels of theoretical and methodological sophistication. In effect, the challenges facing contemporary social scientists are not only limited to the challenge of constructing a sound index of democracy. Today, they also need a profound understanding of the differences between various measures of democracy and their implications for empirical applications. The introduction outlines how the contributions to this thematic issue help scholars cope with the recurrent issues of conceptualization, measurement, and application, and concludes by identifying avenues for future research.}, language = {en} } @misc{HocherYin2017, author = {Hocher, Berthold and Yin, Lianghong}, title = {Why Current PTH Assays Mislead Clinical Decision Making in Patients with Secondary Hyperparathyroidism}, series = {Nephron}, volume = {136}, journal = {Nephron}, number = {2}, publisher = {Karger}, address = {Basel}, issn = {1660-8151}, doi = {10.1159/000455289}, pages = {137 -- 142}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Preclinical studies in cell culture systems as well as in whole animal chronic kidney disease (CKD) models showed that parathyroid hormone (PTH), oxidized at the 2 methionine residues (positions 8 and 18), caused a loss of function. This was so far not considered in the development of PTH assays used in current clinical practice. Patients with advanced CKD are subject to oxidative stress, and plasma proteins (including PTH) are targets for oxidants. In patients with CKD, a considerable but variable fraction (about 70 to 90\%) of measured PTH appears to be oxidized. Oxidized PTH (oxPTH) does not interact with the PTH receptor resulting in loss of biological activity. Currently used intact PTH (iPTH) assays detect both oxidized and non-oxPTH (n-oxPTH). Clinical studies demonstrated that bioactive, n-oxPTH, but not iPTH nor oxPTH, is associated with mortality in CKD patients.}, language = {en} }