@misc{Hennemann2012,
  author    = {Hennemann, Anja},
  title     = {The epistemic and evidential use of Spanish modal adverbs and verbs of cognitive attitude},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  number    = {107},
  issn      = {1866-8380},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-93929},
  pages     = {38},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {This article deals with Spanish modal adverbs and verbs of cognitive attitude (Capelli 2007) and their epistemic and/or evidential use. The article is based upon the hypothesis that the study of the use of these linguistic devices has to be highly context-sensitive, as it is not always (only) the sentence level that has to be looked at if one wants to find out whether a certain adverb or verb of cognitive attitude is used evidentially or epistemically. In this article, therefore, the context is used to determine which meaning aspects of an element are encoded and which are contributed by the context. The data were retrieved from the daily newspaper El Pa{\´i}s. Nevertheless, the present study is not a quantitative one, but rather a qualitative study. My corpus analysis indicates that it is not possible to differentiate between the linguistic categories of evidentiality and epistemic modality in every case, although it indeed is possible in the vast majority of cases. In verbs of cognitive attitude, evidentiality and epistemic modality seem to be two interwoven categories, while concerning modal adverbs it is usually possible to separate the categories and to distinguish between the different subtypes of evidentiality such as visual evidence, hearsay and inference.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Hennemann2016,
  author    = {Hennemann, Anja},
  title     = {A cognitive-constructionist approach to Spanish creo {\O} and creo yo '[I] think'},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  number    = {121},
  issn      = {1866-8380},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-397485},
  pages     = {26},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {The present study approaches the Spanish postposed constructions creo {\O} and creo yo '[p], [I] think' from a cognitive-constructionist perspective. It is argued that both constructions are to be distinguished from one another because creo {\O} has a subjective function, while in creo yo, it is the intersubjective dimension that is particularly prominent. The present investigation takes both a qualitative and a quantitative perspective. With regard to the latter, the problem of quantitative representativity is addressed. The discussion posed the question of how empirical research can feed back into theory, more precisely, into the framework of Cognitive Construction Grammar. The data to be analyzed here are retrieved from the corpora Corpus de Referencia del Espa{\~n}ol Actual and Corpus del Espa{\~n}ol.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Lenz2023,
  author    = {Lenz, Markus Alexander},
  title     = {Die verletzte Republik},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  number    = {179},
  issn      = {1866-8380},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-57441},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-574414},
  pages     = {XV, 659},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Die Studie stellt die Frage nach dem Beitrag erz{\"a}hlender Literatur zu einem Dialog {\"u}ber Formen der Gewalt im gesellschaftlichen Raum Frankreich zu Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts. Unter R{\"u}ckgriff auf Bourdieu'sche Konzepte literatursoziologischer Theorie diskutiert sie zun{\"a}chst die f{\"u}r ein sozialwissenschaftlich relevantes Erfassen des Wissens von Literatur notwendige Perspektive auf erz{\"a}hlte Gewalt. Bei dem daf{\"u}r untersuchten Text-Korpus handelt es sich um vielrezipierte Erz{\"a}hltexte des literarischen Feldes in Frankreich, welche gr{\"o}ßtenteils in der zweiten Dekade des 21. Jahrhunderts erschienen sind. Ausgehend von theoretischen {\"U}berlegungen zu Grenzen und M{\"o}glichkeiten einer solchen feldsoziologischen Fokussierung auf die Literatur der unmittelbaren Gegenwart wird am konkreten Textmaterial und mit den Mitteln der Literaturwissenschaft untersucht, wie und warum die franz{\"o}sische Literatur {\"u}ber unterschiedliche Formen von Gewalt, vom Erinnern an die historisch gewordenen Gewalttraumata des 20. Jahrhunderts, vom Terrorismus des 21. Jahrhunderts, von Rassismus und Klassismus der Gegenwart, von Femiziden und Homophobie, {\"u}ber «Abgeh{\"a}ngte» in l{\"a}ndlichen Gebieten, aber auch im Zentrum der Metropole, {\"u}ber Arbeitslosigkeit und Armut in Frankreich erz{\"a}hlt. Er{\"o}ffnet werden soll eine komplement{\"a}re Perspektive der Literaturwissenschaft zur soziologischen und historischen Gewaltforschung {\"u}ber den gesellschaftlichen Raum unseres europ{\"a}ischen Nachbarn.},
  language  = {de}
}