@article{Hassler2013,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Volksgeist und Geschichtlichkeit in Sprache und Recht : Beitr{\"a}ge von Romanisten als Mitglieder und korrespondierende Mitglieder der Berliner Akademie der Wissenschaften in der ersten H{\"a}lfte des 19. Jahrhunderts},
  isbn      = {978-3-8253-5913-3},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Hassler2013,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {O debate acerca da ordem das palavras: continuidade e desenvolvimento de um topos desde as teorias da l{\´i}ngua racionalistas do s{\´e}culo XVII},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Hassler2013,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Von lat. IAM zu polfunktionalen pragmatischen Partikeln in romanischen Sprachen},
  isbn      = {978-3-8382-0509-0},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Hassler2014,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Evidentiality and the expression of speaker's stance in Romance languages and German},
  series = {Discourse Studies : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of text and talk},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {Discourse Studies : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of text and talk},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Sage Publications},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1461-4456},
  doi       = {10.1177/1461445614564522},
  pages     = {182 -- 209},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {In recent years, the category of evidentiality has also come into use for the description of Romance languages and of German. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. We consider evidentiality to be a structural dimension of grammar, the values of which are expressed by types of constructions that code the source of information which a speaker imparts. If we look at the situation in Romance languages and in German, drawing a boundary between epistemic modality and evidentiality presents problems that are difficult to solve. Adding markers of the source of the speaker's knowledge often limits the degree of responsibility of the speaker for the content of the utterance. Evidential adverbs are a frequently used means of marking the source of the speaker's knowledge. The evidential meaning is generalised to marking any source of knowledge, what can be regarded as a result of a process of pragmaticalisation. The use of certain means which also carry out evidential markings can even contribute to the blurring of the different kinds of evidentiality. German also has modal verbs which in conjunction with the perfect tense of the verb have a predominantly evidential use (sollen and wollen). But even here the evidential marking is not without influence on the modality of the utterance. The Romance languages, however, do not have such specialised verbs for expressing evidentiality in certain contexts. To do this, they mark evidentiality - often context bound - by verb forms such as the conditional and the imperfect tense. This article shall contrast the different architectures used in expressing evidentiality in German and in the Romance languages.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2014,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Los tiempos verbales y sus denominaciones en las gram{\´a}ticas espa{\~n}olas desde el siglo XVII hasta el siglo XX},
  series = {M{\´e}todos y resultados actuales en Historiograf{\´i}a de la Ling{\"u}{\´i}stica},
  volume    = {1},
  journal   = {M{\´e}todos y resultados actuales en Historiograf{\´i}a de la Ling{\"u}{\´i}stica},
  publisher = {Nodus Publikationen},
  address   = {M{\"u}nster},
  isbn      = {978-3-89323-020-4},
  pages     = {349 -- 360},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {In this paper, the names of the Spanish verb forms are examined with emphasis on the forms of the so-called past tense and the relationship of their conceptual potential to the function of these forms. The names of the verb forms in Spanish grammars from the 17th to the 20th century are determined by Latin grammar, but also by theoretical positions of their authors.},
  language  = {es}
}
@article{Hassler2015,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Ram{\´o}n Campos P{\´e}rez: un te{\´o}rico del lenguaje dejado en el olvido},
  series = {Censuras, exclusiones y silencios en la historia de la ling{\"u}{\´i}stica hisp{\´a}nica},
  volume    = {36},
  journal   = {Censuras, exclusiones y silencios en la historia de la ling{\"u}{\´i}stica hisp{\´a}nica},
  editor    = {Calero Vaquero, Mar{\´i}a Luisa and Subirats R{\"u}ggeberg, Carlos},
  issn      = {1139-8736},
  pages     = {73 -- 94},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Ram{\´o}n Campos was very much influenced by the sensationist views current in French linguistic theory and developed these further, even to the point of drawing radical conclusions. In his opinion, abstraction is solely possible by using words. According to his ideas, articulated spoken language is the essential prerequisite for higher thought processes. Furthermore, the adjectives which name characteristics are derived from nouns. Memory and the formation of general ideas are the result of the "gift of the word" and by no means are actions of the human mind. Sign language, which was accepted in French linguistic theory as a precursor of spoken language, is not enough for carrying out abstractions. The tendency of thought to concretise contributes to the dissemination of abstractions. No dependent or referential word can be understood as the original word. He also developed these ideas in his treatise De la desigualdad personal en la sociedad civil ('On personal inequality in civil society'), where they became the basis of a new ethics of communication. This paper intends to explore the concept of the "gift of the word", which according to Campos is the only instrument of abstraction and analysis. Applying this concept, human thought can be divided into two capacities or powers: imagination and memory.},
  language  = {es}
}
@article{Hassler2015,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Evidentiality and the expression of speaker's stance in Romance languages and German},
  series = {Discourse studies : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of text and talk},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {Discourse studies : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of text and talk},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1461-4456},
  doi       = {10.1177/1461445614564522},
  pages     = {182 -- 209},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {In recent years, the category of evidentiality has also come into use for the description of Romance languages and of German. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. We consider evidentiality to be a structural dimension of grammar, the values of which are expressed by types of constructions that code the source of information which a speaker imparts. If we look at the situation in Romance languages and in German, drawing a boundary between epistemic modality and evidentiality presents problems that are difficult to solve. Adding markers of the source of the speaker's knowledge often limits the degree of responsibility of the speaker for the content of the utterance. Evidential adverbs are a frequently used means of marking the source of the speaker's knowledge. The evidential meaning is generalised to marking any source of knowledge, what can be regarded as a result of a process of pragmaticalisation. The use of certain means which also carry out evidential markings can even contribute to the blurring of the different kinds of evidentiality. German also has modal verbs which in conjunction with the perfect tense of the verb have a predominantly evidential use (sollen and wollen). But even here the evidential marking is not without influence on the modality of the utterance. The Romance languages, however, do not have such specialised verbs for expressing evidentiality in certain contexts. To do this, they mark evidentiality - often context bound - by verb forms such as the conditional and the imperfect tense. This article shall contrast the different architectures used in expressing evidentiality in German and in the Romance languages.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2016,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Die {\´E}cole Normale des Jahres III und Innovation im Sprachunterricht},
  series = {Beitr{\"a}ge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {Beitr{\"a}ge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Nodus Publikationen},
  address   = {M{\"u}nster},
  isbn      = {978-3-89323-609-1},
  issn      = {0939-2815},
  pages     = {107 -- 122},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Hassler2016,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {La inversiones del orden de palabras},
  series = {Revista de Investigaci{\´o}n Ling{\"u}{\´i}stica},
  volume    = {19},
  journal   = {Revista de Investigaci{\´o}n Ling{\"u}{\´i}stica},
  issn      = {1989-4554},
  pages     = {35 -- 60},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Las teor{\´i}as sobre el orden de las palabras del siglo XVII han encontrado mucha repercusi{\´o}n en las investigaciones actuales sobre la estructura de la informaci{\´o}n. No obstante, estas alusiones tienden a ser inconscientes. ?'C{\´o}mo deben evaluar los histori{\´o}grafos tales similitudes, mucho m{\´a}s all{\´a} de determinar su continuidad? ?'Se pueden derivar tal vez conclusiones sobre este tema complejo, que es relevante en la discusi{\´o}n de hoy en d{\´i}a, tomando en cuenta las diversas posiciones opuestas y el intenso discurso del siglo XVIII?},
  language  = {es}
}
@article{Hassler2016,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {El Curso de ling{\"u}{\´i}stica general de Saussure y su importancia en el desarrollo de la ling{\"u}{\´i}stica estructural},
  series = {Revista Entornos : {\´O}rgano de divulgaci{\´o}n cient{\´i}fico, tecnol{\´o}gico y cultural de la Vicerrector{\´i}a de Investigaci{\´o}n y Proyecci{\´o}n Social de la Universidad Surcolombiana},
  volume    = {29},
  journal   = {Revista Entornos : {\´O}rgano de divulgaci{\´o}n cient{\´i}fico, tecnol{\´o}gico y cultural de la Vicerrector{\´i}a de Investigaci{\´o}n y Proyecci{\´o}n Social de la Universidad Surcolombiana},
  number    = {2},
  edition   = {1},
  publisher = {Vicerrector{\´i}a de Investigaci{\´o}n y Proyecci{\´o}n Social de la Universidad Surcolombiana},
  address   = {Neiva},
  issn      = {0124-7905},
  pages     = {235 -- 255},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {En esta contribuci{\´o}n se explicar{\´a} la influencia que tuvo el Curso de ling{\"u}{\´i}stica general de Ferdinand de Saussure en la ling{\"u}{\´i}stica estructural, as{\´i} como el desarrollo de algunos conceptos prominentes en esta obra antes y despu{\´e}s de Saussure. El estructuralismo es un fen{\´o}meno que se ha caracterizado por ser una corriente importante de la ling{\"u}{\´i}stica europea y americana del siglo XX. Se demostrar{\´a} que la ling{\"u}{\´i}stica estructural no hace m{\´a}s que acentuar una actitud que ya se encontraba presente anteriormente en la ling{\"u}{\´i}stica y que todav{\´i}a sigue estando presente. Esto tambi{\´e}n se puede ver en Espa{\~n}a donde la ling{\"u}{\´i}stica estructural no se puede explicar solamente como una importaci{\´o}n tard{\´i}a. Tambi{\´e}n se observar{\´a}, por el otro lado, que el pensamiento de Ferdinand de Saussure, considerado el fundador del estructuralismo, es menos opuesto a todo lo que se considera ajeno al estructuralismo. En esta contribuci{\´o}n me propongo hacer una revisi{\´o}n de los conceptos que se consideran iniciadores del estructuralismo. La publicaci{\´o}n de los manuscritos de la ling{\"u}{\´i}stica general de Saussure (2002) permite adquirir una visi{\´o}n m{\´a}s amplia y m{\´a}s detallada de los conceptos de las teor{\´i}as ling{\"u}{\´i}sticas en cuesti{\´o}n.},
  language  = {es}
}