@article{MuwongeSchiefeleSsenyongaetal.2019, author = {Muwonge, Charles Magoba and Schiefele, Ulrich and Ssenyonga, Joseph and Kibedi, Henry}, title = {Modeling the relationship between motivational beliefs, cognitive learning strategies, and academic performance of teacher education students}, series = {South African journal of psychology}, volume = {49}, journal = {South African journal of psychology}, number = {1}, publisher = {Sage Publ.}, address = {London}, issn = {0081-2463}, doi = {10.1177/0081246318775547}, pages = {122 -- 135}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Although self-regulated learning has received much attention over the past decades, research on how teacher education students regulate their own learning has been scarce, particularly in third world countries. In the present study, we examined the structural relationships between motivational beliefs, cognitive learning strategies, and academic performance among teacher education students in Uganda. The sample comprised of 1081 students selected from seven universities. Data were collected using several subscales from the modified Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire and were analyzed by structural equation modeling. Cognitive learning strategies fully mediated the relationship between motivational beliefs and academic performance. Motivational beliefs contributed to students' academic performance mainly through influencing their critical thinking and organizational skills. Therefore, interventions to improve teacher education students' academic performance should focus not only on boosting their motivation but also on enhancing their use of cognitive learning strategies.}, language = {en} } @article{SoemerIdsardiMinnaertetal.2019, author = {Soemer, Alexander and Idsardi, Hilda Marije and Minnaert, Alexander and Schiefele, Ulrich}, title = {Mind wandering and reading comprehension in secondary school children}, series = {Learning and individual differences}, volume = {75}, journal = {Learning and individual differences}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {1041-6080}, doi = {10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101778}, pages = {11}, year = {2019}, abstract = {This study investigated predictors of mind wandering during reading and their effects on comprehension in a sample of secondary school children. One hundred and twenty-five eighth-graders read either an easy, moderately difficult, or difficult version of an expository text and subsequently answered a number of comprehension questions. Students were asked about their thoughts during reading, their propensity to mind wander in various life situations, as well as their interest in the topics of the text. Overall, the results were consistent with the general mind wandering literature: More difficult texts were associated with lower topic interest, more mind wandering during reading, and worse comprehension. Topic interest was negatively related to mind wandering during reading. Furthermore, the propensity to mind wander in daily life had both a positive effect and a negative effect on comprehension, the latter being mediated by mind wandering during reading. Based on these results, it is argued that mind wandering may benefit school children's reading comprehension if it is applied in appropriate situations and for activities that promote comprehension.}, language = {en} } @article{SchiefeleStutzSchaffner2016, author = {Schiefele, Ulrich and Stutz, Franziska and Schaffner, Ellen}, title = {Longitudinal relations between reading motivation and reading comprehension in the early elementary grades}, series = {Learning and individual differences}, volume = {51}, journal = {Learning and individual differences}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {1041-6080}, doi = {10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.031}, pages = {49 -- 58}, year = {2016}, language = {en} } @misc{CsikszentmihalyiSchiefele1994, author = {Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly and Schiefele, Ulrich}, title = {Interest and the Quality of Experience in Classrooms}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-33647}, year = {1994}, abstract = {This study investigated the relation between interest in four different subject areas (mathematics, biology, English, history) and the quality of experience in class. The strength of interest as a predictor of experience was contrasted with that of achievement motivation and scholastic ability. A total of208 highly able freshmen and sophomores completed interest ratings, an achievement motivation questionnaire, and the Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test (PSAT). These assessments were followed by one week of experience sampling. In addition, grades were available for the subject areas involved. The results showed that interest was a significant predictor of the experience of potency, intrinsic motivation, self-esteem, and perception of skill. Controlling for ability and achievement motivation did not decrease the strength of these relations. Achievement motivation and ability proved to be considerably weaker predictors of the quality of experience than was interest. In addition, interest contributed significantly to the prediction of grades in mathematics, biology, and history, but not English. The main results and some limitations of the study are discussed, and suggestions for future research are made.}, language = {en} } @misc{SchiefeleSchaffnerMoelleretal.2012, author = {Schiefele, Ulrich and Schaffner, Ellen and M{\"o}ller, Jens and Wigfield, Allan}, title = {Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence}, series = {Reading research quarterly}, volume = {47}, journal = {Reading research quarterly}, number = {4}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {0034-0553}, doi = {10.1002/RRQ.030}, pages = {427 -- 463}, year = {2012}, abstract = {This review of research examines the constructs of reading motivation and synthesizes research findings of the past 20 years on the relationship between reading motivation and reading behavior (amount, strategies, and preferences), and the relationship between reading motivation and reading competence (reading skills and comprehension). In addition, evidence relating to the causal role of motivational factors and to the role of reading behavior as a mediator of the effects of motivation on reading competence is examined. We identify seven genuine dimensions of reading motivation: curiosity, involvement, competition, recognition, grades, compliance, and work avoidance. Evidence for these dimensions comes from both quantitative and qualitative research. Moreover, evidence from previous studies confirms the positive contribution of intrinsic reading motivation, and the relatively small or negative contribution of extrinsic reading motivation, to reading behavior and reading competence. The positive contribution of intrinsic motivation is particularly evident in relation to amount of reading for enjoyment and reading competence and holds even when accounting for relevant control variables. However, the causal role of reading motivation and the mediating role of reading behavior remain largely unresolved issues.}, language = {en} } @article{Schiefele2017, author = {Schiefele, Ulrich}, title = {Classroom management and mastery-oriented instruction as mediators of the effects of teacher motivation on student motivation}, series = {Teaching and teacher education : an international journal of research and studies}, volume = {64}, journal = {Teaching and teacher education : an international journal of research and studies}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0742-051X}, doi = {10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.004}, pages = {115 -- 126}, year = {2017}, abstract = {This study addressed the role of elementary school teachers' classroom management and mastery-oriented instructional practices as mediators of the effects of teacher motivation on student motivation. The sample comprised 110 teacher-class pairs (1731 students). The results from multilevel regression analyses revealed that teacher educational interest contributed to student reports of teachers' instructional practices. These practices, in turn, were significant predictors of students' subject interest and mastery goals at both the student and the class level. Finally, teacher educational interest showed significant and substantial indirect relations to student motivation that were mediated by teachers' instructional practices.}, language = {en} } @article{WarnerFaySchiefeleetal.2017, author = {Warner, Greta J. and Fay, Doris and Schiefele, Ulrich and Stutz, Franziska and Wollny, Anna}, title = {Being proactive when reading: Academic personal initiative as a predictor of word comprehension development}, series = {Learning and individual differences}, volume = {55}, journal = {Learning and individual differences}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {1041-6080}, doi = {10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.012}, pages = {130 -- 140}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Academic personal initiative (API) has rarely been studied with regard to literacy development. The purpose of this longitudinal study was therefore to examine the unique effects of API on the development of word comprehension as an indicator of word reading. To this end, the effects of previous word comprehension, intrinsic reading motivation, and basic cognitive ability (i.e., processing speed) were controlled for. A total of 1,515 German students participated in a longitudinal assessment starting in Grades 1 to 3, with a second point of measurement nine months later. Latent change score analyses revealed positive associations between API and gains in word comprehension, both in the total sample and at all grade levels. These relations were robust against the effects of previous word comprehension and intrinsic reading motivation. The findings suggest that children play an active role in their own reading development. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.}, language = {en} }