@article{MuellerKepserSchallenberger2021, author = {M{\"u}ller, Hans-Georg and Kepser, Matthis and Schallenberger, Stefan}, title = {Getrennt- und Zusammenschreibung}, series = {Der Deutschunterricht}, journal = {Der Deutschunterricht}, number = {3}, publisher = {Friedrich Verlag GmbH}, address = {Hannover}, pages = {37 -- 48}, year = {2021}, language = {de} } @article{Philipowski2021, author = {Philipowski, Katharina}, title = {Konrads ›Klage der Kunst‹ im Kontext von Sangspruchdichtung und allegorischem Ich-Erz{\"a}hlen}, series = {Konrad von W{\"u}rzburg als Erz{\"a}hler}, volume = {10}, journal = {Konrad von W{\"u}rzburg als Erz{\"a}hler}, number = {Themenheft}, publisher = {University of Oldenburg Press}, address = {Oldenburg}, issn = {2568-9967}, doi = {10.25619/BmE20214131}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/https://ojs.uni-oldenburg.de/ojs/index.php/bme/article/view/131}, pages = {57 -- 79}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Die ›Klage der Kunst‹ Konrads wird auf dem Hintergrund und in Bezug zur Sangspruchdichtung sowie der Textfamilie allegorischer Erz{\"a}hlungen in der ersten Person untersucht. W{\"a}hrend Strophik, Sangbarkeit und kunst-Thematik das Werk in den Kontext der Sangspruchdichtung r{\"u}cken, stellt es sich durch seinen Umfang, seine Narrativit{\"a}t und das Erz{\"a}hltempus, das die Handlung zwar nicht dominiert, aber rahmt, an die Seite erster fr{\"u}her Erz{\"a}hlexperimente, die Dialog, Streit oder Rede als erlebte Erfahrung eines Ich pr{\"a}sentieren wie das ›Frauenbuch‹ Ulrichs von Liechtenstein, das aber - {\"a}hnlich wie Konrads ›Klage der Kunst‹ - zu seiner Zeit offenbar nur m{\"a}ßig erfolgreich, jedenfalls nur unikal {\"u}berliefert, ist. Konrad scheint der erste zu sein, der in der h{\"o}fischen Literatur das Erz{\"a}hlen in der ersten Person mit Allegorizit{\"a}t verkn{\"u}pft. Er nutzt dieses neue und in der sp{\"a}teren Literatur so {\"u}beraus fruchtbare Erz{\"a}hlformat geschickt, um seine eigene literarische Meisterschaft unter anderem in den Gestalten von wildekeit und kunst unter Beweis zu stellen, zu thematisieren und szenisch zu verhandeln.}, language = {de} } @article{Renner2021, author = {Renner, Kaspar}, title = {Die „eine deutsche Nation" und die „vielen kleinen V{\"o}lker"}, series = {{\´E}tudes germaniques : revue trimestrielle de la Soci{\´e}t{\´e} des {\´E}tudes Germaniques}, volume = {303}, journal = {{\´E}tudes germaniques : revue trimestrielle de la Soci{\´e}t{\´e} des {\´E}tudes Germaniques}, number = {3}, editor = {Coignard, Tristan and Portes, Lidwine}, publisher = {Klincksieck}, address = {Paris}, issn = {0014-2115}, doi = {10.3917/eger.303.0301}, pages = {301 -- 320}, year = {2021}, abstract = {This article focuses on Herder's unpublished anthology of Ancient Folk Songs (1773-1775). A close reading of the prefaces reveals the dialectic of the ,national' and its critique that is inherent to the anthology. In the preface to the first book, the collection of folk songs is primarily motivated by the idea of building a German national poetry. This project of nation-building with the means of folk poetry can be considered innovative because it aims to bridge the gap between popular and scholarly culture and to activate the audience in all its cognitive and affective potentials. Moreover, the vision of national poetry is intertwined with a comparative perspective on European folkloristics, as the British culture appears as role model for the creative adaption and tradition of popular ballads and songs. Finally, in the preface to the fourth book of the anthology, the songs of ,wild' foreign peoples are not only discovered as a vital resource for the reinvention of national poetry, but, according to Herder's vision, they also constitute an archive of human affects and expressions that transcends national and cultural boundaries.}, language = {de} } @article{Stockhorst2021, author = {Stockhorst, Stefanie}, title = {Hippologischer Fachdiskurs und dialogische Fiktion}, series = {Daphnis : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r deutsche Literatur und Kultur der fr{\"u}hen Neuzeit (1400-1750)}, volume = {49}, journal = {Daphnis : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r deutsche Literatur und Kultur der fr{\"u}hen Neuzeit (1400-1750)}, number = {3}, publisher = {Brill Rodopi}, address = {Leiden}, isbn = {0300-693X}, issn = {1879-6583}, doi = {10.1163/18796583-12340025}, pages = {416 -- 443}, year = {2021}, abstract = {This contribution analyses the textual strategies in Danup's literary dialogue, which is enriched in many ways with literary topoi and rhetorical devices. It is, in fact, a specialised text on the art of horsemanship, which proves to be surprisingly innovative in this regard. However, it is not only relevant to the hippological, but also to the political culture of the early modern period. For the author updates a literary genre pattern, takes up literary traditions and uses aesthetic means for successful self-promotion as an expert.}, language = {de} } @article{Stockhorst2021, author = {Stockhorst, Stefanie}, title = {J{\"u}dische Intellektuelle im Spiegel von Friedrich Nicolais Allgemeiner deutscher Bibliothek am Beispiel der Rezensionen {\"u}ber Moses Mendelssohn und Marcus Herz}, series = {J{\"u}dische und christliche Intellektuelle in Berlin um 1800: Freundschaften - Partnerschaften - Feindschaften}, journal = {J{\"u}dische und christliche Intellektuelle in Berlin um 1800: Freundschaften - Partnerschaften - Feindschaften}, editor = {Berghahn, Cord-Friedrich and Lifschitz, Avi and Wiedemann, Conrad}, publisher = {Wehrhahn}, address = {Hannover}, isbn = {978-3-86525-825-0}, pages = {135 -- 160}, year = {2021}, language = {de} }