@misc{ChaabeneLesinskiBehmetal.2020,
  author    = {Chaabene, Helmi and Lesinski, Melanie and Behm, David George and Granacher, Urs},
  title     = {Performance- and healthrelated benefits of youth resistance training},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {3},
  issn      = {1866-8364},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-52691},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-526912},
  pages     = {12},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {There is ample evidence that youth resistance training (RT) is safe, joyful, and effective for different markers of performance (e.g., muscle strength, power, linear sprint speed) and health (e.g., injury prevention). Accordingly, the first aim of this narrative review is to present and discuss the relevance of muscle strength for youth physical development. The second purpose is to report evidence on the effectiveness of RT on muscular fitness (muscle strength, power, muscle endurance), on movement skill performance and injury prevention in youth. There is evidence that RT is effective in enhancing measures of muscle fitness in children and adolescents, irrespective of sex. Additionally, numerous studies indicate that RT has positive effects on fundamental movement skills (e.g., jumping, running, throwing) in youth regardless of age, maturity, training status, and sex. Further, irrespective of age, sex, and training status, regular exposure to RT (e.g., plyometric training) decreases the risk of sustaining injuries in youth. This implies that RT should be a meaningful element of youths' exercise programming. This has been acknowledged by global (e.g., World Health Organization) and national (e.g., National Strength and Conditioning Association) health- and performance-related organizations which is why they recommended to perform RT as an integral part of weekly exercise programs to promote muscular strength, fundamental movement skills, and to resist injuries in youth.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{RamirezCampilloGarciaPinillosGarciaRamosetal.2018,
  author    = {Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo and Garc{\´i}a-Pinillos, Felipe and Garc{\´i}a-Ramos, Amador and Yanci, Javier and Gentil, Paulo and Chaabene, Helmi and Granacher, Urs},
  title     = {Effects of Different Plyometric Training Frequencies on Components of Physical Fitness in Amateur Female Soccer Players},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {474},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-419377},
  pages     = {11},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Plyometric jump training (PJT) is a frequently used and effective means to improve amateur and elite soccer players' physical fitness. However, it is unresolved how different PJT frequencies per week with equal overall training volume may affect training-induced adaptations. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effects of an in-season 8 week PJT with one session vs. two sessions per week and equal training volume on components of physical fitness in amateur female soccer players. A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted. Participants (N = 23; age, 21.4 ± 3.2 years) were randomly assigned to a one session PJT per-week (PJT-1, n = 8), two sessions PJT per-week (PJT-2, n = 8) or an active control group (CON, n = 7). Before and after training, participants performed countermovement jumps (CMJ), drop-jumps from a 20-cm drop-height (DJ20), a maximal kicking velocity test (MKV), the 15-m linear sprint-time test, the Meylan test for the assessment of change of direction ability (CoDA), and the Yo-Yo intermittent recovery endurance test (Yo-YoIR1). Results revealed significant main effects of time for the CMJ, DJ20, MKV, 15-m sprint, CoDA, and the Yo-YoIR1 (all p < 0.001; d = 0.57-0.83). Significant group × time interactions were observed for the CMJ, DJ20, MKV, 15-m sprint, CoDA, and the Yo-YoIR1 (all p < 0.05; d = 0.36-0.51). Post-hoc analyses showed similar improvements for PJT-1 and PJT-2 groups in CMJ (Δ10.6\%, d = 0.37; and Δ10.1\%, d = 0.51, respectively), DJ20 (Δ12.9\%, d = 0.47; and Δ13.1\%, d = 0.54, respectively), MKV (Δ8.6\%, d = 0.52; and Δ9.1\%, d = 0.47, respectively), 15-m sprint (Δ8.3\%, d = 2.25; and Δ9.5\%, d = 2.67, respectively), CoDA (Δ7.5\%, d = 1.68; and Δ7.4\%, d = 1.16, respectively), and YoYoIR1 (Δ10.3\%, d = 0.22; and Δ9.9\%, d = 0.26, respectively). No significant pre-post changes were found for CON (all p > 0.05; Δ0.5-4.2\%, d = 0.03-0.2). In conclusion, higher PJT exposure in terms of session frequency has no extra effects on female soccer players' physical fitness development when jump volume is equated during a short-term (i.e., 8 weeks) training program. From this, it follows that one PJT session per week combined with regular soccer-specific training appears to be sufficient to induce physical fitness improvements in amateur female soccer players.},
  language  = {en}
}