@article{WarcholdPradhanThapaetal.2022,
  author    = {Warchold, Anne and Pradhan, Prajal and Thapa, Pratibha and Putra, Muhammad Panji Islam Fajar and Kropp, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {Building a unified sustainable development goal database},
  series = {Sustainable development},
  journal   = {Sustainable development},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {0968-0802},
  doi       = {10.1002/sd.2316},
  pages     = {16},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The 2020s are an essential decade for achieving the 2030 Agenda and its Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). For this, SDG research needs to provide evidence that can be translated into concrete actions. However, studies use different SDG data, resulting in incomparable findings. Researchers primarily use SDG databases provided by the United Nations (UN), the World Bank Group (WBG), and the Bertelsmann Stiftung \& Sustainable Development Solutions Network (BE-SDSN). We compile these databases into one unified SDG database and examine the effects of the data selection on our understanding of SDG interactions. Among the databases, we observed more different than similar SDG interactions. Differences in synergies and trade-offs mainly occur for SDGs that are environmentally oriented. Due to the increased data availability, the unified SDG database offers a more nuanced and reliable view of SDG interactions. Thus, the SDG data selection may lead to diverse findings, fostering actions that might neglect or exacerbate trade-offs.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WarcholdPradhanKropp2020,
  author    = {Warchold, Anne and Pradhan, Prajal and Kropp, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {Variations in sustainable development goal interactions},
  series = {Sustainable development},
  volume    = {29},
  journal   = {Sustainable development},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {0968-0802},
  doi       = {10.1002/sd.2145},
  pages     = {285 -- 299},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {To fulfill the 2030 Agenda, the complexity of sustainable development goal (SDG) interactions needs to be disentangled. However, this understanding is currently limited. We conduct a cross-sectional correlational analysis for 2016 to understand SDG interactions under the entire development spectrum. We apply several correlation methods to classify the interaction as synergy or trade-off and characterize them according to their monotony and linearity. Simultaneously, we analyze SDG interactions considering population, location, income, and regional groups. Our findings highlight that synergies always outweigh trade-offs and linear outweigh non-linear interactions. SDG 1, 5, and 6 are associated with linear synergies, SDG 3, and 7 with non-linear synergies. SDG interactions vary according to a country's income and region along with the gender, age, and location of its population. In summary, to achieve the 2030 Agenda the detected interactions and inequalities across countries need be tracked and leveraged to "leave no one behind."},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ChanBoranvanAsseltetal.2019,
  author    = {Chan, Sander and Boran, Idil and van Asselt, Harro and Iacobuta, Gabriela and Niles, Navam and Rietig, Katharine and Scobie, Michelle and Bansard, Jennifer S. and Delgado Pugley, Deborah and Delina, Laurence L. and Eichhorn, Friederike and Ellinger, Paula and Enechi, Okechukwu and Hale, Thomas and Hermwille, Lukas and Hickmann, Thomas and Honegger, Matthias and Hurtado Epstein, Andrea and Theuer, Stephanie La Hoz and Mizo, Robert and Sun, Yixian and Toussaint, Patrick and Wambugu, Geoffrey},
  title     = {Promises and risks of nonstate action in climate and sustainability governance},
  series = {Wiley interdisciplinary reviews : Climate change},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Wiley interdisciplinary reviews : Climate change},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {1757-7780},
  doi       = {10.1002/wcc.572},
  pages     = {8},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@techreport{Arajaervi2017,
  type      = {Working Paper},
  author    = {Araj{\"a}rvi, Noora},
  title     = {The Rule of Law in the 2030 Agenda},
  series = {KFG Working Paper Series},
  journal   = {KFG Working Paper Series},
  number    = {9},
  issn      = {2509-3770},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-42190},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-421906},
  pages     = {34},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The rule of law is the cornerstone of the international legal system. This paper shows, through analysis of intergovernmental instruments, statements made by representatives of States, and negotiation records, that the rule of law at the United Nations has become increasingly contested in the past years. More precisely, the argument builds on the process of integrating the notion of the rule of law into the Sustainable Development Goals, adopted in September 2015 in the document Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The main sections set out the background of the rule of law debate at the UN, the elements of the rule of law at the goal- and target-levels in the 2030 Agenda - especially in the SDG 16 -, and evaluate whether the rule of law in this context may be viewed as a normative and universal foundation of international law. The paper concludes, with reflections drawn from the process leading up to the 2030 Agenda and the final outcome document that the rule of law - or at least strong and precise formulations of the concept - may be in decline in institutional and normative settings. This can be perceived as symptomatic of a broader crisis of the international legal order.},
  language  = {en}
}