@phdthesis{Cabral2009,
  author    = {Cabral, Juliano Sarmento},
  title     = {Demographic processes determining the range dynamics of plant species, and their consequences for biodiversity maintenance in the face of environmental change},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-41188},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2009},
  abstract  = {The present thesis aims to introduce process-based model for species range dynamics that can be fitted to abundance data. For this purpose, the well-studied Proteaceae species of the South African Cape Floristic Region (CFR) offer a great data set to fit process-based models. These species are subject to wildflower harvesting and environmental threats like habitat loss and climate change. The general introduction of this thesis presents shortly the available models for species distribution modelling. Subsequently, it presents the feasibility of process-based modelling. Finally, it introduces the study system as well as the objectives and layout. In Chapter 1, I present the process-based model for range dynamics and a statistical framework to fit it to abundance distribution data. The model has a spatially-explicit demographic submodel (describing dispersal, reproduction, mortality and local extinction) and an observation submodel (describing imperfect detection of individuals). The demographic submodel links species-specific habitat models describing the suitable habitat and process-based demographic models that consider local dynamics and anemochoric seed dispersal between populations. After testing the fitting framework with simulated data, I applied it to eight Proteaceae species with different demographic properties. Moreover, I assess the role of two other demographic mechanisms: positive (Allee effects) and negative density-dependence. Results indicate that Allee effects and overcompensatory local dynamics (including chaotic behaviour) seem to be important for several species. Most parameter estimates quantitatively agreed with independent data. Hence, the presented approach seemed to suit the demand of investigating non-equilibrium scenarios involving wildflower harvesting (Chapter 2) and environmental change (Chapter 3). The Chapter 2 addresses the impacts of wildflower harvesting. The chapter includes a sensitivity analysis over multiple spatial scales and demographic properties (dispersal ability, strength of Allee effects, maximum reproductive rate, adult mortality, local extinction probability and carrying capacity). Subsequently, harvesting effects are investigated on real case study species. Plant response to harvesting showed abrupt threshold behavior. Species with short-distance seed dispersal, strong Allee effects, low maximum reproductive rate, high mortality and high local extinction are most affected by harvesting. Larger spatial scales benefit species response, but the thresholds become sharper. The three case study species supported very low to moderate harvesting rates. Summarizing, demographic knowledge about the study system and careful identification of the spatial scale of interest should guide harvesting assessments and conservation of exploited species. The sensitivity analysis' results can be used to qualitatively assess harvesting impacts for poorly studied species. I investigated in Chapter 3 the consequences of past habitat loss, future climate change and their interaction on plant response. I use the species-specific estimates of the best model describing local dynamics obtained in Chapter 1. Both habitat loss and climate change had strong negative impacts on species dynamics. Climate change affected mainly range size and range filling due to habitat reductions and shifts combined with low colonization. Habitat loss affected mostly local abundances. The scenario with both habitat loss and climate change was the worst for most species. However, this impact was better than expected by simple summing of separate effects of habitat loss and climate change. This is explained by shifting ranges to areas less affected by humans. Range size response was well predicted by the strength of environmental change, whereas range filling and local abundance responses were better explained by demographic properties. Hence, risk assessments under global change should consider demographic properties. Most surviving populations were restricted to refugia, serving as key conservation focus.The findings obtained for the study system as well as the advantages, limitations and potentials of the model presented here are further discussed in the General Discussion. In summary, the results indicate that 1) process-based demographic models for range dynamics can be fitted to data; 2) demographic processes improve species distribution models; 3) different species are subject to different processes and respond differently to environmental change and exploitation; 4) density regulation type and Allee effects should be considered when investigating range dynamics of species; 5) the consequences of wildflower harvesting, habitat loss and climate change could be disastrous for some species, but impacts vary depending on demographic properties; 6) wildflower harvesting impacts varies over spatial scale; 7) The effects of habitat loss and climate change are not always additive.},
  language  = {en}
}