@phdthesis{Hethey2017, author = {Hethey, Christoph Philipp}, title = {Cell physiology based pharmacodynamic modeling of antimicrobial drug combinations}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-401056}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {102}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Mathematical models of bacterial growth have been successfully applied to study the relationship between antibiotic drug exposure and the antibacterial effect. Since these models typically lack a representation of cellular processes and cell physiology, the mechanistic integration of drug action is not possible on the cellular level. The cellular mechanisms of drug action, however, are particularly relevant for the prediction, analysis and understanding of interactions between antibiotics. Interactions are also studied experimentally, however, a lacking consent on the experimental protocol hinders direct comparison of results. As a consequence, contradictory classifications as additive, synergistic or antagonistic are reported in literature. In the present thesis we developed a novel mathematical model for bacterial growth that integrates cell-level processes into the population growth level. The scope of the model is to predict bacterial growth under antimicrobial perturbation by multiple antibiotics in vitro. To this end, we combined cell-level data from literature with population growth data for Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. The cell-level data described growth-determining characteristics of a reference cell, including the ribosomal concentration and efficiency. The population growth data comprised extensive time-kill curves for clinically relevant antibiotics (tetracycline, chloramphenicol, vancomycin, meropenem, linezolid, including dual combinations). The new cell-level approach allowed for the first time to simultaneously describe single and combined effects of the aforementioned antibiotics for different experimental protocols, in particular different growth phases (lag and exponential phase). Consideration of ribosomal dynamics and persisting sub-populations explained the decreased potency of linezolid on cultures in the lag phase compared to exponential phase cultures. The model captured growth rate dependent killing and auto-inhibition of meropenem and - also for vancomycin exposure - regrowth of the bacterial cultures due to adaptive resistance development. Stochastic interaction surface analysis demonstrated the pronounced antagonism between meropenem and linezolid to be robust against variation in the growth phase and pharmacodynamic endpoint definition, but sensitive to a change in the experimental duration. Furthermore, the developed approach included a detailed representation of the bacterial cell-cycle. We used this representation to describe septation dynamics during the transition of a bacterial culture from the exponential to stationary growth phase. Resulting from a new mechanistic understanding of transition processes, we explained the lag time between the increase in cell number and bacterial biomass during the transition from the lag to exponential growth phase. Furthermore, our model reproduces the increased intracellular RNA mass fraction during long term exposure of bacteria to chloramphenicol. In summary, we contribute a new approach to disentangle the impact of drug effects, assay readout and experimental protocol on antibiotic interactions. In the absence of a consensus on the corresponding experimental protocols, this disentanglement is key to translate information between heterogeneous experiments and also ultimately to the clinical setting.}, language = {en} }