@article{ApeltSenge2015,
  author    = {Apelt, Maja and Senge, Konstanze},
  title     = {Organisation und Unsicherheit},
  series = {Organisation und Unsicherheit},
  journal   = {Organisation und Unsicherheit},
  editor    = {Apelt, Maja},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  pages     = {1 -- 13},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ApeltBesioCorsietal.2017,
  author    = {Apelt, Maja and Besio, Cristina and Corsi, Giancarlo and von Groddeck, Victoria and Grothe-Hammer, Michael and Tacke, Veronika},
  title     = {Resurrecting organization without renouncing society},
  series = {European management journal},
  volume    = {35},
  journal   = {European management journal},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Elsevier Science},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0263-2373},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.emj.2017.01.002},
  pages     = {8 -- 14},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {In a recent article in this journal, Ahrne, Brunsson, and Seidl (2016) suggest a definition of organization as a 'decided social order' composed of five elements (membership, rules, hierarchies, monitoring, and sanctions) which rest on decisions. 'Partial organization' uses only one or a few of these decidable elements while 'complete organization' uses them all. Such decided orders may also occur outside formal organizations, as the authors observe. Although we appreciate the idea of improving our understanding of organization(s) in modern society, we believe that Ahrne, Brunsson, and Seidl's suggestion jeopardizes the concept of organization by blurring its specific meaning. As the authors already draw on the work of Niklas Luhmann, we propose taking this exploration a step further and the potential of systems theory more seriously. Organizational analysis would then be able to retain a distinctive notion of formal organization on the one hand while benefiting from an encompassing theory of modern society on the other. With this extended conceptual framework, we would expect to gain a deeper understanding of how organizations implement and shape different societal realms as well as mediate between their particular logics, and, not least, how they are related to non-organizational social forms (e.g. families).},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ApeltDosdallTrautwein2020,
  author    = {Apelt, Maja and Dosdall, Henrik and Trautwein, Ray},
  title     = {Wie das Recht in die Organisation kommt - Die Akteur*innen des Antidiskriminierungsrechts in m{\"a}nnlich gepr{\"a}gten Organisationen},
  series = {Kritische Justiz},
  volume    = {53},
  journal   = {Kritische Justiz},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  issn      = {0023-4834},
  doi       = {10.5771/0023-4834-2020-4-445},
  pages     = {445 -- 456},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ApeltBinderKuster2021,
  author    = {Apelt, Maja and Binder, Beate and Kuster, Friederike},
  title     = {Einleitung},
  series = {Feministische Studien},
  volume    = {39},
  journal   = {Feministische Studien},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {De Gruyter Oldenbourg},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0723-5186},
  doi       = {10.1515/fs-2021-0027},
  pages     = {197 -- 201},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BinderApelt2021,
  author    = {Binder, Beate and Apelt, Maja},
  title     = {Legal Gender Studies: Herausforderungen und Perspektiven feministischer Rechtskritik},
  series = {Feministische Studien},
  volume    = {39},
  journal   = {Feministische Studien},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {De Gruyter Oldenbourg},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0723-5186},
  doi       = {10.1515/fs-2021-0034},
  pages     = {321 -- 340},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ApeltKochMichalowskietal.2023,
  author    = {Apelt, Maja and Koch, Annika and Michalowski, Ines and Molzberger, Kaspar and Schenk, Liane and Schmidt, Max Oliver},
  title     = {How organisations regulate Muslim body practices},
  series = {Comparative migration studies},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Comparative migration studies},
  publisher = {European Research Centre on Migration and Ethnic Relations},
  address   = {Utrecht},
  issn      = {2214-594X},
  doi       = {10.1186/s40878-023-00355-y},
  pages     = {19},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {In a comparison of three human service organisations in which the human body plays a key role, we examine how organisations regulate religious body practices. We concentrate on Muslim norms of dressing and undressing as a potential focal point of cultural and religious diversity. Inspired by Ray's (2019) idea of racialized organizations, we assume that state-run organizations in Germany are characterized by a strong commitment to religious tolerance and non-discrimination but also marked by anti- Muslim sentiment prevalent among the German population. Our study looks for mechanism that explain how Human Service Organizations accommodate Muslim body practices. It draws on qualitative empirical data collected in state-run hospitals, schools and swimming pools in Germany. Our analyses show that the organizations draw on formal and informal rules at the organizational level to accommodate Islam. We identify five general organizational mechanisms that may hinder Muslim accommodation in human service organizations. In particular, we see a risk of decoupling between the expectation of religious tolerance and processes that lead to informal discrimination, driven mainly by the difficulty of controlling group dynamics among users.},
  language  = {en}
}