@article{Sorg2019, author = {Sorg, Bernhard}, title = {Zur Konstruktion eines transzendentalen {\"a}sthetischen Subjekts bei Bernhard und Jelinek}, series = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard Intertextualit{\"a}t - Korrelationen - Korrespondenzen}, volume = {154}, journal = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard Intertextualit{\"a}t - Korrelationen - Korrespondenzen}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-11-063267-5}, doi = {10.1515/9783110632675-008}, pages = {89 -- 99}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{Demske2019, author = {Demske, Ulrike}, title = {Zur Autonomie indirekter Redewiedergabe - eine diachrone Perspektive}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r germanistische Linguistik}, volume = {47}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r germanistische Linguistik}, number = {1}, editor = {{\´A}gel, Vilmos and Feilke, Helmuth and Linke, Angelika and L{\"u}deling, Anke and Tophinke, Doris}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin, New York}, issn = {0301-3294 print}, doi = {10.1515/zgl-2019-0003}, pages = {70 -- 101}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Regarding verbal mood and complementation patterns of reporting verbs, the distinction between direct and indirect reported speech is well established in present-day German. This paper looks into the history of German: Common knowledge has it that both the use of verbal mood as well as the quality of clause linkage undergo considerable changes giving rise to the question how these changes affect the manifestations of indirect reported speech in earlier stages of German. The historical record of the 16th century (with an outlook on the 17th century) shows that the distinction between direct and indirect reported speech is not yet grammaticalized in historical sources at the time. In particular with respect to dependent (in)direct reported speech, both types prefer V2-complements with only verbal mood differentiating between the types. Although present and past subjunctive have a much wider distribution in earlier stages of German, the occurrence of free indirect speech likewise testifies to its increasing use as a marker of indirect reported speech. The growing conventionalization of patterns of indirect reported speech in the course of Early Modern German may be considered as an example for an increase of subjectification in its development.}, language = {de} } @article{Philipowski2019, author = {Philipowski, Katharina}, title = {Wider die Bew{\"a}ltigungsthese}, series = {13. und 14. P{\"o}chlarner Heldenliedgespr{\"a}ch : die Nibelungenklage : R{\"u}diger von Bechelaren}, journal = {13. und 14. P{\"o}chlarner Heldenliedgespr{\"a}ch : die Nibelungenklage : R{\"u}diger von Bechelaren}, editor = {Keller, Johannes and Kragl, Florian and M{\"u}ller, Stephan}, publisher = {Fassbaender}, address = {Wien}, isbn = {978-3-902575-83-8}, pages = {113 -- 145}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{Gamper2019, author = {Gamper, Jana}, title = {The role of case and animacy in biand monolingual children's sentence interpretation in German}, series = {Open Linguistics}, volume = {5}, journal = {Open Linguistics}, number = {1}, publisher = {de Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {2300-9969}, doi = {10.1515/opli-2019-0001}, pages = {24}, year = {2019}, abstract = {German-speaking children appear to have a strong N1-bias when interpreting non-canonical OVSsentences. During sentence interpretation, especially unambiguous accusative and dative case markers (den 'the-ACC' and dem 'the-DAT') weaken the N1-bias and help building up sentence interpretation strategies on the basis of morphological cues. Still, the N1-bias prevails beyond the age of five (Brandt et al. 2016, Cristante 2016, Dittmar et al. 2008) and remains until puberty (Lidzba et al. 2013). This paper investigates whether prototypical case-animacy coalitions (denACC + N INANIMATE and demDAT + N ANIMATE ) strengthen a morphologically based sentence interpretation strategy in German. The experiment discussed in this paper tests for effects of such case-animacy coalitions in mono- and bilingual primary school children. 20 German monolinguals, 12 Dutch-German and 17 Russian-German bilinguals with a mean age of 9;6 were tested in a forced-choice off-line experiment. Results indicate that case-animacy coalitions weaken the N1-bias in OVS-conditions in German monolinguals and Dutch-German bilinguals, while no effects were found for Russian-German bilinguals. Together with an analysis of individual differences, these group-specific effects are discussed in terms of a developmental approach that represents a gradual cue strength adjustment process in mono- and bilingual children.}, language = {en} } @article{Philipowski2019, author = {Philipowski, Katharina}, title = {R{\"u}diger und die Gaben}, series = {13. und 14. P{\"o}chlarner Heldenliedgespr{\"a}ch : die Nibelungenklage : R{\"u}diger von Bechelaren}, journal = {13. und 14. P{\"o}chlarner Heldenliedgespr{\"a}ch : die Nibelungenklage : R{\"u}diger von Bechelaren}, editor = {Keller, Johannes and Kragl, Florian and M{\"u}ller, Stephan}, publisher = {Fassbaender}, address = {Wien}, isbn = {978-3-902575-83-8}, pages = {313 -- 346}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{Petrescu2019, author = {Petrescu, Corina L.}, title = {Of Sources and Files}, series = {Cold War spy stories from Eastern Europe}, journal = {Cold War spy stories from Eastern Europe}, publisher = {University of Nebraska Press}, address = {Lincoln}, isbn = {978-1-64012-200-0}, doi = {10.2307/j.ctvhhhgcw.9}, pages = {137 -- 159}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Files produced by the secret police forces of former Eastern Bloc countries are complex documents, not completely reliable and yet not fully untrustworthy either—or as the British historian Timothy Garton Ash has remarked, "There is a truth that can be found [in a secret police file]. Not a single, absolute Truth with a capital T but still a real and important one" (2002, 282). As historical documents—texts anchored in a time and place and resulting from specific circumstances—files in general "supplement or rework 'reality'" and are never "mere sources that divulge facts about 'reality'" (LaCapra 1985, 11)}, language = {en} } @article{Philipowski2019, author = {Philipowski, Katharina}, title = {Minne und Sang in lyrischen und narrativen Texten: Minnes{\"a}ngerballaden, Neithart Fuchs und Wartburgkrieg}, series = {S{\"a}ngerliebe - S{\"a}ngerkrieg : lyrische Narrative im {\"a}sthetischen Ged{\"a}chtnis des Mittelalters und der Neuzeit}, journal = {S{\"a}ngerliebe - S{\"a}ngerkrieg : lyrische Narrative im {\"a}sthetischen Ged{\"a}chtnis des Mittelalters und der Neuzeit}, editor = {Kropik, Cordula and Immer, Nikolas}, publisher = {Lang}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-631-77211-9}, pages = {35 -- 64}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{Stockhorst2019, author = {Stockhorst, Stefanie}, title = {Kriegerischer Patriotismus - akustische Nachahmung - g{\"o}ttliche Inspiration}, series = {Johann Klaj (um 1616-1656): Akteur - Werk - Umfeld}, journal = {Johann Klaj (um 1616-1656): Akteur - Werk - Umfeld}, editor = {Niefanger, Dirk and Schnabel, Werner Wilhelm}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin, Boston}, isbn = {978-3-11-066798-1}, pages = {329 -- 351}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{Stockhorst2019, author = {Stockhorst, Stefanie}, title = {Hippotheologie}, series = {Brockes-Lekt{\"u}re : {\"A}sthetik - Religion - Politik}, journal = {Brockes-Lekt{\"u}re : {\"A}sthetik - Religion - Politik}, editor = {Dehrmann, Mark-Georg and G{\"u}nther, Friederike Felicitas}, publisher = {Lang}, address = {Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles [u. a.]}, isbn = {978-3-0343-3923-0}, pages = {185 -- 210}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{Philipowski2019, author = {Philipowski, Katharina}, title = {Figur - Mittelalter / Character - Middle Ages}, series = {Handbuch Historische Narratologie}, journal = {Handbuch Historische Narratologie}, editor = {von Contzen, Eva and Kragl, Florian}, publisher = {J.B. Metzler}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-476-04713-7}, pages = {116 -- 128}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{OPUS4-50491, title = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard}, series = {Untersuchungen zur deutschen Literaturgeschichte, 154}, journal = {Untersuchungen zur deutschen Literaturgeschichte, 154}, editor = {Reinert, Bastian and G{\"o}tze, Clemens}, publisher = {de Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-11-063267-5}, doi = {10.1515/9783110632675}, pages = {274}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Trotz unz{\"a}hliger Forschungsbeitr{\"a}ge zur Literaturnobelpreistr{\"a}gerin Elfriede Jelinek und dem „Verweigerungsk{\"u}nstler" Thomas Bernhard wurde den Verbindungslinien beider Autoren noch nie vergleichend nachgegangen. Der Band erschließt zum 30. Todestag Bernhards (u. 15 Jahre Nobelpreis f{\"u}r Jelinek) anschaulich ein breit gef{\"a}chertes Spektrum an Themen, Perspektiven und Werken beider Schriftsteller im Vergleich. Mit einem Essay von Elfriede Jelinek.}, language = {de} } @article{MeyerKalkus2019, author = {Meyer-Kalkus, Reinhart}, title = {Dramenvorlesen als Kunst - das Beispiel Ludwig Tiecks}, series = {Belebungsk{\"u}nste : Praktiken lebendiger Darstellung in Literatur, Kunst und Wissenschaft um 1800}, journal = {Belebungsk{\"u}nste : Praktiken lebendiger Darstellung in Literatur, Kunst und Wissenschaft um 1800}, publisher = {Fink}, address = {Paderborn}, isbn = {978-3-7705-6292-3}, doi = {10.30965/9783846762929_005}, pages = {61 -- 82}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{Goetze2019, author = {G{\"o}tze, Clemens}, title = {Dieses Interview hat mich v{\"o}llig dekonstruiert}, series = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard Intertextualit{\"a}t - Korrelationen - Korrespondenzen}, volume = {154}, journal = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard Intertextualit{\"a}t - Korrelationen - Korrespondenzen}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-11-063267-5}, doi = {10.1515/9783110632675-010}, pages = {113 -- 129}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{vonBloh2019, author = {von Bloh, Ute}, title = {Die artistische {\"U}berbietung einer brinnenden liebe Freundschaft und Liebe in J{\"o}rg Wickrams ›Gabriotto und Reinhart‹}, series = {Beitr{\"a}ge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur}, volume = {141}, journal = {Beitr{\"a}ge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur}, number = {3}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {0005-8076}, doi = {10.1515/bgsl-2019-0024}, pages = {395 -- 424}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Isolated, yet at the same time, in an environment that is hostile to them, the four characters Jorg Wickram imagines in his novel > Gabriotto und Reinhart< are alone together, as the two doomed couples are all also bound to each other in friendship. The construction of paradoxes, calculated primarily for effect, appears to be one of the novels controlled narrative devices. Much like the narratological strategies of intensification, exaggeration and repetition, they are controlled artifices designed for impact, and well-thought-out gambits on the part of the author which he uses, above all, to continue and intensify the tradition of medieval storytelling, and less frequently to counterpose an alternative understanding. Time and again the author makes use of the potential of widespread literary concepts to demonstrate that the love described in the novel is unparalleled.}, language = {de} } @article{Jelinek2019, author = {Jelinek, Elfriede}, title = {Der Einzige und wir, sein Eigentum : ein Nachruf auf Thomas Bernhard}, series = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard : Intertextualit{\"a}t - Korrelationen - Korrespondenzen}, volume = {154}, journal = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard : Intertextualit{\"a}t - Korrelationen - Korrespondenzen}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-11-063267-5}, doi = {10.1515/9783110632675-002}, pages = {11 -- 14}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{Demske2019, author = {Demske, Ulrike}, title = {Aspectual features and categorial shift}, series = {Language sciences}, volume = {73}, journal = {Language sciences}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0388-0001}, doi = {10.1016/j.langsci.2018.08.006}, pages = {50 -- 61}, year = {2019}, abstract = {The point of departure of this paper is the claim by Heyvaert, Maekelberghe \& Buyle (2019) that the suffix -ing has no aspectual meaning in English gerunds. Rather, the interpretation of nominal and verbal gerunds depends, so they argue, on situation or viewpoint aspect, a claim that contradicts the wide-spread view that the aspectual meaning of English gerunds is brought about by the nominalizing suffix. The present paper addresses the issue from a comparative perspective, focusing on German ung-nominals: while they share aspectual features with their English counterparts, empirical evidence from productivity, distribution, and argument linking shows (i) that the derivational suffix -ung imposes aspectual restrictions on possible verb bases, and (ii) that with respect to argument linking, the deverbal nominal favors the state component of a complex event predicate over its process component. From the historical record of German, we learn that these aspectual restrictions do not hold for ung-nominals in earlier periods of German. With the rise of aspectual restrictions, the nominalization pattern turns more nominal resulting in a position further towards the nominal end of the deverbalization continuum. It appears, then, that it is only in the historical pariods of German that ung-nominals pattern with English nominals as regards their aspectual features. Currently, German ung-nominals are more noun-like than nominal (and verbal) gerunds in English. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.}, language = {en} }