@incollection{Hassler2010,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {La relation entre la philosophie du langage et la s{\´e}mantique chez Coseriu},
  series = {Eugenio Coseriu aujourd'hui : linguistique et philosophie du langage},
  booktitle = {Eugenio Coseriu aujourd'hui : linguistique et philosophie du langage},
  editor    = {G{\´e}rard, Christophe and Missire, R{\´e}gis},
  publisher = {Lambert-Lucas},
  address   = {Limoges},
  isbn      = {978-2-35935-114-9},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {21 -- 33},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {fr}
}
@article{Hassler2010,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Ordnen und Tradieren in narrativen und begrifflichen Reflexionsformen {\"u}ber Sprache},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Hassler2010,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Soci{\´e}t{\´e} d'Histoire et d'{\´E}pist{\´e}mologie des Sciences du Langage (SHESL) - Jahrestagung 2010 : Tagungsbericht},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Hassler2010,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {L'opposition entre la raison d'Etat et la loi dans la pens{\´e}e anti-machiav{\´e}lienne de Fr{\´e}d{\´e}ric II et de Voltaire},
  isbn      = {978-3-0343-0419-1},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {fr}
}
@article{Hassler2010,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {A discuss{\~a}o sobre a origem e o g{\´e}nio da l{\´i}ngua portuguesa desde Duarte Nunes de Le{\~a}o (1606) at{\´e} a Francisco Evaristo Leoni (1858): integra{\c{c}}{\~a}o e transforma{\c{c}}{\~a}o de conceitos europeus},
  isbn      = {978-3-89323- 297-0},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {pt}
}
@article{Hassler2010,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Der genio da l{\´i}ngua in der Geschichte der portugiesischen Grammatikographie},
  isbn      = {978-3-936132-30-4},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Hassler2010,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Sicard et l'enseignement de la langue fran{\c{c}}aise},
  isbn      = {978-84-370-7879-3},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {fr}
}
@article{Hassler2010,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Epistemic modality and evidentiality and their determination on a deictic basis : the case of Romance languages},
  isbn      = {978-3-11-022396-5},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {In recent years the category of evidentiality has come into use also for the description of Romance languages. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. In the following we will first describe the theoretical framework in which we use the category of evidentiality for the description of Romance languages. A key question to be elucidated here will be the determination of evidentiality as a deictic phenomenon. This will also be the basis for discussing the distinction between evidentiality and epistemic modality.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2010,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Epistemic modality and evidentiality and their determination on a deictic basis},
  isbn      = {978-3-11-023433-6},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {It has often been pointed out that there is some overlap between epistemic modality and evidentiality (Chafe \& Nichols 1986, Cornillie 2007, De Haan 1999, Dendale \& Tasmowski 2001, Plungian 2001, Squartini 2004). In this paper I would like to offer several reflections about the necessity of drawing a boundary between modality and evidentiality. Starting from the typological category of evidentiality - extended here for use in pragmatic studies - I will then explore demarcation problems in Romance languages, which lack grammaticalized forms for expressing evidentiality. The underlying premise of this paper is that evidentiality as marker of the origin of the speaker's knowledge stands in relation to the speaker's pragmatic stance. Because the perspective of the speaker is thus incorporated into the utterance, it seems appropriate to analyse the applicability of the deictic category. Finally, under the aspect of deixis, I shall attempt a demarcation between evidentiality and modality.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2010,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Les lecutions avec "sur" et "sous" et leur traduction en allemand},
  issn      = {0015-9409},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {fr}
}
@article{Hassler2010,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Wahrhaftige Historia : zwei Reisen nach Brasilien [True story : two journeys to Brazil] ; (1548-1555)},
  issn      = {0302-5160},
  doi       = {10.1075/hl.37.1/2.18has},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {de}
}