@misc{HoehleFritzscheMessetal.2020,
  author    = {H{\"o}hle, Barbara and Fritzsche, Tom and Meß, Katharina and Philipp, Mareike and Gafos, Adamantios I.},
  title     = {Only the right noise?},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {5},
  issn      = {1866-8364},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-51667},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-516674},
  pages     = {18},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Seminal work by Werker and colleagues (Stager \& Werker [1997]Nature, 388, 381-382) has found that 14-month-old infants do not show evidence for learning minimal pairs in the habituation-switch paradigm. However, when multiple speakers produce the minimal pair in acoustically variable ways, infants' performance improves in comparison to a single speaker condition (Rost \& McMurray [2009]Developmental Science, 12, 339-349). The current study further extends these results and assesses how different kinds of input variability affect 14-month-olds' minimal pair learning in the habituation-switch paradigm testing German learning infants. The first two experiments investigated word learning when the labels were spoken by a single speaker versus when the labels were spoken by multiple speakers. In the third experiment we studied whether non-acoustic variability, implemented by visual variability of the objects presented together with the labels, would also affect minimal pair learning. We found enhanced learning in the multiple speakers compared to the single speaker condition, confirming previous findings with English-learning infants. In contrast, visual variability of the presented objects did not support learning. These findings both confirm and better delimit the beneficial role of speech-specific variability in minimal pair learning. Finally, we review different proposals on the mechanisms via which variability confers benefits to learning and outline what may be likely principles that underlie this benefit. We highlight among these the multiplicity of acoustic cues signalling phonemic contrasts and the presence of relations among these cues. It is in these relations where we trace part of the source for the apparent paradoxical benefit of variability in learning.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{TanDueringWildeetal.2023,
  author    = {Tan, Sarah and D{\"u}ring, Sarah and Wilde, Alina and Hamburger, Lara and Fritzsche, Tom and Felsing, Ulrike and Lauer, Norina and Corsten, Sabine and Ostermann, Frank and Nonn, Kerstin and Nerz, Verena and Neumann, Sandra and Zauke, Svenja and Sandrieser, Patricia and Steinberg, Romy Simone and Thurmann, Anika and D{\"o}rr, Fiona and Bilda, Kerstin and Kluth, Alicia and Lemire-Tremblay, Marilyne and Jamey, Kevin and Dalla Bella, Simone and Falk, Simone and Kleing{\"u}nther, Constanze and Gabler, Katrin and Elligsen, Chiara and Weiland, Katharina and Wiehe, Lea and Wahl, Michael and Binczyk, Sarah and Staebel, Cornelia and Jung, Stefanie and Eikerling, Maren and Czok, Clara and Sallat, Stephan and Collasius, Valerie and Grahovac, Tena},
  title     = {Spektrum Patholinguistik Band 16. Schwerpunktthema: Schnittstelle Alltag: Transfer und Teilhabe in der Sprachtherapie},
  number    = {16},
  editor    = {Tan, Sarah and D{\"u}ring, Sarah and Wilde, Alina and Hamburger, Lara and Fritzsche, Tom},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-559-0},
  issn      = {1866-9433},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-59043},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-590433},
  pages     = {viii, 234},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Das 16. Herbsttreffen Patholinguistik mit dem Schwerpunktthema »Schnittstelle Alltag: Transfer und Teilhabe in der Sprachtherapie« fand am 19.11.2022 als Online-Veranstaltung statt. Das Herbsttreffen wird seit 2007 j{\"a}hrlich vom Verband f{\"u}r Patholinguistik e.V. (vpl), seit 2021 vom Deutschen Bundesverband f{\"u}r akademische Sprachtherapie und Logop{\"a}die (dbs) in Kooperation mit der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam durchgef{\"u}hrt. Der vorliegende Tagungsband beinhaltet die Vortr{\"a}ge zum Schwerpunktthema sowie die Posterpr{\"a}sentationen zu weiteren Themen aus der sprachtherapeutischen Forschung und Praxis.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{DueringLubitzSchnelleetal.2022,
  author    = {D{\"u}ring, Sarah and Lubitz, Anika and Schnelle, Kirsten and Klitsch, Julia and Netzebandt, Jonka and Fritzsche, Tom},
  title     = {Interdisziplin{\"a}re Zusammenarbeit},
  series = {Spektrum Patholinguistik 15},
  journal   = {Spektrum Patholinguistik 15},
  number    = {15},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-542-2},
  issn      = {1866-9433},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-57238},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-572386},
  pages     = {87 -- 106},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{HoehleFritzscheMueller2016,
  author    = {H{\"o}hle, Barbara and Fritzsche, Tom and M{\"u}ller, Anja},
  title     = {Children's Comprehension of Sentences with Focus Particles and the Role of Cognitive Control},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-90524},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Children's interpretations of sentences containing focus particles do not seem adult-like until school age. This study investigates how German 4-year-old children comprehend sentences with the focus particle 'nur' (only) by using different tasks and controlling for the impact of general cognitive abilities on performance measures. Two sentence types with 'only' in either pre-subject or pre-object position were presented. Eye gaze data and verbal responses were collected via the visual world paradigm combined with a sentence-picture verification task. While the eye tracking data revealed an adult-like pattern of focus particle processing, the sentence-picture verification replicated previous findings of poor comprehension, especially for 'only' in pre-subject position. A second study focused on the impact of general cognitive abilities on the outcomes of the verification task. Working memory was related to children's performance in both sentence types whereas inhibitory control was selectively related to the number of errors for sentences with 'only' in pre-subject position. These results suggest that children at the age of 4 years have the linguistic competence to correctly interpret sentences with focus particles, which-depending on specific task demands-may be masked by immature general cognitive abilities.},
  language  = {en}
}