@article{vanGervenBredervelddeKleinetal.2015,
  author    = {van Gerven, Luuk P. A. and Brederveld, Robert J. and de Klein, Jeroen J. M. and DeAngelis, Don L. and Downing, Andrea S. and Faber, Michiel and Gerla, Daan J. and Janse, Jan H. and Janssen, Annette B. G. and Jeuken, Michel and Kooi, Bob W. and Kuiper, Jan J. and Lischke, Betty and Liu, Sien and Petzoldt, Thomas and Schep, Sebastiaan A. and Teurlincx, Sven and Thiange, Christophe and Trolle, Dennis and van Nes, Egbert H. and Mooij, Wolf M.},
  title     = {Advantages of concurrent use of multiple software frameworks in water quality modelling using a database approach},
  series = {Fundamental and applied limnology : official journal of the International Association of Theoretical and Applied Limnology},
  volume    = {186},
  journal   = {Fundamental and applied limnology : official journal of the International Association of Theoretical and Applied Limnology},
  number    = {1-2},
  publisher = {Schweizerbart},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  issn      = {1863-9135},
  doi       = {10.1127/fal/2015/0631},
  pages     = {5 -- 20},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Water quality modelling deals with multidisciplinary questions ranging from fundamental to applied. Addressing this broad range of questions requires multiple analysis techniques and therefore multiple frameworks. Through the recently developed database approach to modelling (DATM), it has become possible to run a model in multiple software frameworks without much overhead. Here we apply DATM to the ecosystem model for ditches PCDitch and its twin model for shallow lakes PCLake. Using DATM, we run these models in six frameworks (ACSL, DELWAQ, DUFLOW, GRIND for MATLAB, OSIRIS and R), and report on the possible model analyses with tools provided by each framework. We conclude that the dynamic link between frameworks and models resulting from DATM has the following main advantages: it allows one to use the framework one is familiar with for most model analyses and eases switching between frameworks for complementary model analyses, including the switch between a 0-D and 1-D to 3-D setting. Moreover, the strength of each framework - including runtime performance - can now be easily exploited. We envision that a community-based further development of the concept can contribute to the future development of water quality modelling, not only by addressing multidisciplinary questions but also by facilitating the exchange of models and process formulations within the community of water quality modellers.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JanssenArhonditsisBeusenetal.2015,
  author    = {Janssen, Annette B. G. and Arhonditsis, George B. and Beusen, Arthur and Bolding, Karsten and Bruce, Louise and Bruggeman, Jorn and Couture, Raoul-Marie and Downing, Andrea S. and Elliott, J. Alex and Frassl, Marieke A. and Gal, Gideon and Gerla, Daan J. and Hipsey, Matthew R. and Hu, Fenjuan and Ives, Stephen C. and Janse, Jan H. and Jeppesen, Erik and Joehnk, Klaus D. and Kneis, David and Kong, Xiangzhen and Kuiper, Jan J. and Lehmann, Moritz K. and Lemmen, Carsten and Oezkundakci, Deniz and Petzoldt, Thomas and Rinke, Karsten and Robson, Barbara J. and Sachse, Rene and Schep, Sebastiaan A. and Schmid, Martin and Scholten, Huub and Teurlincx, Sven and Trolle, Dennis and Troost, Tineke A. and Van Dam, Anne A. and Van Gerven, Luuk P. A. and Weijerman, Mariska and Wells, Scott A. and Mooij, Wolf M.},
  title     = {Exploring, exploiting and evolving diversity of aquatic ecosystem models: a community perspective},
  series = {Aquatic ecology : the international forum covering research in freshwater and marine environments},
  volume    = {49},
  journal   = {Aquatic ecology : the international forum covering research in freshwater and marine environments},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Dordrecht},
  issn      = {1386-2588},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10452-015-9544-1},
  pages     = {513 -- 548},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Here, we present a community perspective on how to explore, exploit and evolve the diversity in aquatic ecosystem models. These models play an important role in understanding the functioning of aquatic ecosystems, filling in observation gaps and developing effective strategies for water quality management. In this spirit, numerous models have been developed since the 1970s. We set off to explore model diversity by making an inventory among 42 aquatic ecosystem modellers, by categorizing the resulting set of models and by analysing them for diversity. We then focus on how to exploit model diversity by comparing and combining different aspects of existing models. Finally, we discuss how model diversity came about in the past and could evolve in the future. Throughout our study, we use analogies from biodiversity research to analyse and interpret model diversity. We recommend to make models publicly available through open-source policies, to standardize documentation and technical implementation of models, and to compare models through ensemble modelling and interdisciplinary approaches. We end with our perspective on how the field of aquatic ecosystem modelling might develop in the next 5-10 years. To strive for clarity and to improve readability for non-modellers, we include a glossary.},
  language  = {en}
}