@article{LenkeitHartmannEhlertetal.2022, author = {Lenkeit, Jenny and Hartmann, Anne and Ehlert, Antje and Knigge, Michel and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine}, title = {Effects of special educational needs and socioeconomic status on academic achievement}, series = {International Journal of Educational Research}, volume = {113}, journal = {International Journal of Educational Research}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0883-0355}, doi = {10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101957}, pages = {20}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Germany is continuously expanding its inclusive education system. Research provides evidence that students with special educational needs (SEN) in inclusive school settings show lower academic achievement and come from lower socioeconomic backgrounds than their peers without SEN. Identifying to what extent the disadvantages originating from both characteristics are confounded in predicting academic achievement, has been neglected in the German educational context. Using data of 1711 primary and secondary school students from a longitudinal study in the state of Brandenburg, this study evaluates to what degree SEN (in the areas of learning and emotional-social difficulties) and socioeconomic background (SES) are confounded in predicting academic initial achievement in reading and mathematics as well as their development over time. Using multilevel modelling techniques that nest three measurement points into students and students into classes, results identify SES and SEN as relevant predictors of achievement status and growth in both subjects. Only few and small mediation effects of SES were found, indicating that both SES and SEN remain independent risk factors for achievement. Understanding the origins of student disadvantage can help teachers to make better informed choices for designing support measures and aid policymakers' reasoning for resource allocations.}, language = {en} } @article{SpoererHenkeBosse2021, author = {Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine and Henke, Thorsten and Bosse, Stefanie}, title = {Is there a dark side of co-teaching?}, series = {Learning and instruction : the journal of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction}, volume = {71}, journal = {Learning and instruction : the journal of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0959-4752}, doi = {10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101393}, pages = {10}, year = {2021}, language = {en} } @article{SpoererLenkeitBosseetal.2020, author = {Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine and Lenkeit, Jenny and Bosse, Stefanie and Hartmann, Anne and Ehlert, Antje and Knigge, Michel}, title = {Students' perspective on inclusion}, series = {International journal of educational research}, volume = {103}, journal = {International journal of educational research}, publisher = {Elsevier Science}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0883-0355}, doi = {10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101641}, pages = {13}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The goal of the present study was to analyze how students' attitudes towards inclusive education develop over the course of a school year and how these attitudes relate to students' peer relations. Sixth- and seventh-graders of 44 inclusive classes filled out a questionnaire at two measurement points within one school year to assess attitudes towards inclusive education and peer relations. Applying multilevel regression analyses it turned out that changes in peer relations over time were positively predicted by students' attitudes towards instructional adaptations for students with behaviour difficulties. Further, students with self-perceived behavior difficulties reported lower scores for peer relations compared to students without self-perceived difficulties. Results are discussed with respect to structural factors and individual characteristics affecting inclusive education.}, language = {en} } @article{JaeutheLambrechtBosseetal.2020, author = {Jaeuthe, Jessica and Lambrecht, Jennifer and Bosse, Stefanie and Bogda, Katja and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine}, title = {Entwicklung der Rechtschreibkompetenz im zweiten und dritten Schuljahr}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft}, volume = {23}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft}, number = {4}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Wiesbaden}, issn = {1434-663X}, doi = {10.1007/s11618-020-00959-5}, pages = {823 -- 846}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Im deutschsprachigen Raum existiert eine Vielzahl von Modellen zur Entwicklung der Rechtschreibkompetenz von Grundschulkindern. Es zeigen sich starke {\"U}bereinstimmungen in der Vorstellung von aufeinanderfolgenden Kompetenzniveaus, wobei in allen Modellen drei Niveaus auftreten: 1) noch nicht lautgetreue Schreibungen, 2) lautgetreue Schreibungen und 3) orthographisch korrekte Schreibungen. Die Kriterien, auf Basis derer ein Kind dem jeweiligen Niveau zugeordnet wird, bleiben jedoch vage. Ebenso fehlt eine umfassende empirische {\"U}berpr{\"u}fung der Modelle. Die vorliegende L{\"a}ngsschnittstudie untersuchte zu drei Messzeitpunkten (Anfang Klasse 2, Ende Klasse 2, Ende Klasse 3) die Schreibungen von N = 697 Grundschulkinder mit standardisierten Rechtschreibtests. Mittels latenter Transitionsanalyse wurden drei Profile identifiziert: 1) {\"U}berwiegend nicht lautgetreu 2) {\"U}berwiegend lautgetreu und 3) {\"U}berwiegend korrekt. Auch die durchlaufenen Pfade und {\"U}bergangswahrscheinlichkeiten st{\"u}tzen die angenommene hierarchische Struktur der Modelle.}, language = {de} } @article{JaeutheLenkeitBosseetal.2020, author = {Jaeuthe, Jessica and Lenkeit, Jenny and Bosse, Stefanie and Bogda, Katja and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine}, title = {Die Bedeutsamkeit individueller Merkmale f{\"u}r die Entwicklung von Rechtschreibkompetenzen in der Grundschule}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Entwicklungspsychologie und p{\"a}dagogische Psychologie}, volume = {52}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Entwicklungspsychologie und p{\"a}dagogische Psychologie}, number = {1-2}, publisher = {Hogrefe}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, issn = {0049-8637}, doi = {10.1026/0049-8637/a000223}, pages = {12 -- 24}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Aus theoretischer Sicht existieren verschiedene Merkmale, die einen Einfluss auf die individuelle Entwicklung der Rechtschreibkompetenz von Grundschulkindern aus{\"u}ben k{\"o}nnen. Um diese zu analysieren, wurden in der vorliegenden Studie Schreibungen von 607 Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}lern zu drei Messzeitpunkten (Anfang Klasse 2, Ende Klasse 2, Ende Klasse 3) untersucht. Zur Bestimmung des Rechtschreibkompetenzniveaus wurden Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}ler mittels latenter Profilanalyse zu den drei Profilen Buchstabenentdeckende ({\"u}berwiegend nicht lautgetreue Schreibungen), Phonemprofis ({\"u}berwiegend lautgetreue Schreibungen) und Rechtschreibspezialisten (vor allem korrekte Schreibungen) zugeordnet. Mittels logistischer Regressionen wurde gepr{\"u}ft, welche Zusammenh{\"a}nge zwischen den individuellen Merkmalen Geschlecht, kognitive Grundf{\"a}higkeiten und Arbeitsverhalten und den Zuordnungen zu einem Profil sowie den Wechseln zwischen den Profilen bestehen. Unter Kontrolle des Arbeitsverhaltens zeigten sich keine signifikanten Zusammenh{\"a}nge mit dem Geschlecht oder der kognitiven Grundf{\"a}higkeit. Hingegen konnten bedeutsame Zusammenh{\"a}nge des Arbeitsverhaltens sowohl mit der Zuordnung zu den Profilen als auch mit den Wechseln zwischen den Profilen Phonemprofis und Rechtschreibspezialisten gefunden werden.}, language = {de} } @article{HenkeBosseLambrechtetal.2017, author = {Henke, Thorsten and Bosse, Stefanie and Lambrecht, Jennifer and J{\"a}ntsch, Christian and Jaeuthe, Jessica and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine}, title = {Mittendrin oder nur dabei?}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r p{\"a}dagogische Psychologie}, volume = {31}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r p{\"a}dagogische Psychologie}, number = {4}, publisher = {Hogrefe}, address = {Bern}, issn = {1010-0652}, doi = {10.1024/1010-0652/a000196}, pages = {111 -- 123}, year = {2017}, abstract = {In der vorliegenden Studie wurde das Ausmaß der sozialen Partizipation von Grundsch{\"u}lerinnen und Grundsch{\"u}lern mit einem und ohne festgestelltem sonderp{\"a}dagogischem F{\"o}rderbedarf (SPF) untersucht. Insgesamt wurden N = 1436 Sch{\"u}ler der 2. und 3. Jahrgangsstufe mittels Frageb{\"o}gen zum peerbezogenen Klassenklima, zur Einsch{\"a}tzung der eigenen sozialen Integration, zum Gef{\"u}hl des Angenommen-Seins durch die Lehrkraft und zur Anzahl ihrer Freundschaften befragt. Mithilfe des Propensity Score Matching-Verfahrens wurden den Sch{\"u}lern mit einem festgestellten SPF in den Bereichen Lernen, emotionale und soziale Entwicklung oder Sprache (N = 91) basierend auf theoretisch und empirisch abgeleiteten Hintergrundvariablen statistische Zwillinge ohne SPF zugeordnet. Zu den Hintergrundvariablen z{\"a}hlten famili{\"a}re, leistungs- und verhaltensbezogene Merkmale. Der Vergleich der Sch{\"u}ler mit einem festgestellten SPF mit ihren statistischen Zwillingen ohne SPF lieferte keine Hinweise auf einen Zusammenhang zwischen dem Status eines SPF und der sozialen Partizipation.}, language = {de} } @article{KochSpoerer2017, author = {Koch, Helvi and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine}, title = {Students improve in reading comprehension by learning how to teach reading strategies}, series = {Psychology Learning and Teaching}, volume = {16}, journal = {Psychology Learning and Teaching}, publisher = {Sage Publ.}, address = {London}, issn = {1475-7257}, doi = {10.1177/1475725717700525}, pages = {197 -- 211}, year = {2017}, abstract = {In this intervention study, we investigated how we could teach university students who were majoring in education to teach reading strategies. The goal of the study was to analyze whether and to what extent students would benefit from the intervention with respect to their own learning. Did their own reading skills improve after they attended the intervention? The sample consisted of n = 61 students who were assigned to one of two conditions: (a) an adaption of reciprocal teaching; and (b) a control group that was not taught how to teach reading strategies. The evidence-based teaching method used in the intervention condition consisted of three elements: modeling, scaffolding, and repeated practice. Training success was assessed in a pre-posttest control group design with standardized reading comprehension and reading speed tests. To compare the development of the students in the two conditions, repeated measures ANOVAs were used. At posttest, intervention students outperformed control students in reading comprehension as well as in reading speed.}, language = {en} } @article{SchuenemannSpoererVoellingeretal.2017, author = {Sch{\"u}nemann, Nina and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine and Voellinger, Vanessa A. and Brunstein, Joachim Clemens}, title = {Peer feedback mediates the impact of self-regulation procedures on strategy use and reading comprehension in reciprocal teaching groups}, series = {Instructional Science}, volume = {45}, journal = {Instructional Science}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Dordrecht}, issn = {0020-4277}, doi = {10.1007/s11251-017-9409-1}, pages = {395 -- 415}, year = {2017}, abstract = {The goal of this research was to highlight the role social regulatory processes play in making students' teamwork in reciprocal teaching (RT) groups (a classroom activity in which students take the teacher's role in small group reading sessions) effective. In addition to teamwork quality, we expected peer feedback to be a key factor in enhancing students' reading comprehension achievements. Because previous research (Sch{\"u}nemann et al. in Contemp Educ Psychol 38:289-305, 2013) has shown that procedures of self-regulated learning (SRL) augment the effects of RT methods, we further assumed that such procedures would promote the quality of students' collaborative efforts. In a cluster-randomized trial, students in 12 fifth-grade classes practiced a strategic approach to reading either in a RT condition or in a RT + SRL condition. In one of the 14 sessions, students' interactive behavior was videotaped. Strategy use and reading comprehension were assessed at pretest, posttest, and maintenance. Performance differences between conditions were reliable only at maintenance. A multilevel mediation analysis showed that relative to RT students, RT + SRL students were better able to provide their teammates with informative feedback and organize their group work in a task-focused manner. Only feedback quality mediated the sustainability of treatment effects on strategy use and reading comprehension. In essence, this research suggests that effective reading comprehension trainings should integrate explicit instruction and practice in reading strategies, SRL, and focus on supportive peer processes in small groups with extensive instruction and practice in peer feedback.}, language = {en} } @article{VoellingerSpoererLubbeetal.2018, author = {V{\"o}llinger, Vanessa A. and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine and Lubbe, Dirk and Brunstein, Joachim C.}, title = {A path analytic test of the reading strategies mediation model}, series = {The Journal of Educational Research}, volume = {111}, journal = {The Journal of Educational Research}, number = {6}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {Abingdon}, issn = {0022-0671}, doi = {10.1080/00220671.2017.1412930}, pages = {733 -- 745}, year = {2018}, abstract = {This study examined a theoretical model hypothesizing that reading strategies mediate the effects of intrinsic reading motivation, reading fluency, and vocabulary knowledge on reading comprehension. Using path analytic methods, we tested the direct and indirect effects specified in the hypothesized model in a sample of 1105 fifth-graders. In addition to standardized tests and questionnaires, we administered a performance test to assess students' proficiency in the application of three reading strategies. The overall fit of the model to the data was good. Both cognitive (fluency and vocabulary) and motivational (intrinsic reading motivation) variables had an indirect effect on reading comprehension through their influence on reading strategies. Reading strategies had a unique effect on reading comprehension and partially mediated the effects that cognitive and motivational variables had on fifth-graders' reading achievements.}, language = {en} } @article{HenkeBosseSpoerer2018, author = {Henke, Thorsten and Bosse, Stefanie and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine}, title = {Binnendifferenzierung im inklusiven Unterricht}, series = {Inklusive Schul- und Unterrichtsentwicklung : vom Anspruch zur erfolgreichen Umsetzung}, journal = {Inklusive Schul- und Unterrichtsentwicklung : vom Anspruch zur erfolgreichen Umsetzung}, publisher = {Kohlhammer}, address = {Stuttgart}, isbn = {978-3-17-032719-1}, pages = {143 -- 159}, year = {2018}, language = {de} }