@misc{Ebke2018,
  author    = {Ebke, Thomas},
  title     = {Rezension zu: Kelm, Holden: Hegel und Foucault. Die Geschichtlichkeit des Wissens als Entwicklung und Transformation. - Berlin: de Gruyter, 2015. - VIII, 455 S. - ISBN: 978-3-11-040092-2},
  series = {Hegel-Studien},
  volume    = {51},
  journal   = {Hegel-Studien},
  publisher = {Felix Meiner Verlag},
  address   = {Hamburg},
  isbn      = {978-3-7873-3470-4},
  issn      = {0073-1587},
  doi       = {10.28937/978-3-7873-3470-4},
  pages     = {242 -- 247},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{Petsche2018,
  author    = {Petsche, Hans-Joachim},
  title     = {In honour of Seymour Papert},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-49730},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-497302},
  pages     = {17},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Forth is nice and flexible but to a philosopher and teacher educator Logo is the more impressing language. Both are relatives of Lisp, but Forth has a reverse Polish notation where as Logo has an infix notation. Logo allows top down programming, Forth only bottom up. Logo enables recursive programming, Forth does not. Logo includes turtle graphics, Forth has nothing comparable. So what to do if you can't get Logo and have no information about its inner architecture? This should be a case of "empirical modelling": How can you model observable results of the behaviour of Logo in terms of Forth? The main steps to solve this problem are shown in the first part of the paper. The second part of the paper discusses the problem of modelling and shows that the modelling of making and the modelling of recognition have the same mathematical structure. So "empirical modelling" can also serve for modelling desired behaviour of technical systems. The last part of the paper will show that the heuristic potential of a problem which should be modeled is more important than the programming language. The Picasso construal shows, in a very simple way, how children of different ages can model emotional relations in human behaviour with a simple Logo system.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MuellerDoohmYos2018,
  author    = {M{\"u}ller-Doohm, Stefan and Yos, Roman},
  title     = {Fatale Orthodoxie},
  series = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  volume    = {66},
  journal   = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0012-1045},
  doi       = {10.1515/dzph-2018-0056},
  pages     = {788 -- 801},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Our reply to Fabian Freyenhagen's article "Was ist orthodoxe Kritische Theorie?" (DZPhil 65.3 [2017], 456-469) raises the question whether his proposal that Critical Theory only "be adequately and appropriately critical" without a program of justification spares the search for any general criteria. Answering negatively we conversely want to recall, particularly with regard to Horkheimers's and Adornos's Dialectic of Enlightment as well as Habermas's concept of an emancipatory interest, that such a criterion as a normative foundation of critique is crucial not only for systematical purposes, but also recognised as necessary in this respect by Adorno, who Freyenhagen wants to play off against programs of justification. Critical Theory needs to be clear in this respect. Against this background we are questioning Freyenhagen's recourse to an "interest in abolishing social injustice" as the "only criterion for Critical Theory." Because Freyenhagen ignores the fact that Critical Theory has been understood by its representatives in a twofold manner - as a theoretical program of justification for one and secondly as a cultural diagnosis - his plea for an orthodox Critical Theory is endangered by decisionism.},
  language  = {de}
}
@phdthesis{Doborosky2018,
  author    = {Doborosky, Julia},
  title     = {Der Philologiebegriff August Boeckhs im Spiegel seiner privaten B{\"u}chersammlung},
  series = {Berliner Intellektuelle um 1800},
  journal   = {Berliner Intellektuelle um 1800},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-8305-3932-2},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {364},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {August Boeckh (1785-1867) verf{\"u}gte {\"u}ber eine umfangreiche private B{\"u}chersammlung mit einem beeindruckenden Facettenreichtum. Diese spiegelt Boeckhs Philologiebegriff wider, der s{\"a}mtliche Lebensbereiche umfasste, und erm{\"o}glicht durch die in seinen B{\"u}chern hinterlassenen Marginalien einen gut nachvollziehbaren Einblick in den wissenschaftlichen Arbeitsprozess des Philologen. Aufbauend auf der rekonstruierten Boeckhschen Bibliothek blickt Julia Doborosky auf die Auseinandersetzung zwischen Boeckh und seinem Kritiker Gottfried Hermann um die Ausgestaltung der philologischen Disziplin, das wissenschaftliche Werk Boeckhs selbst und auf seine Interaktion innerhalb eines wissenschaftlich-institutionellen Netzwerks. Anhand dieser drei S{\"a}ulen zeigt sie die unterschiedlichen Modalit{\"a}ten auf, in denen Boeckh seinen Philologiebegriff entwickelte, darlegte und zur Anwendung brachte - und wie hierbei seine B{\"u}chersammlung als greifbares Zeugnis einer geisteswissenschaftlichen Ideen- und Disziplingeschichte stets pr{\"a}sent ist.},
  language  = {de}
}
@phdthesis{Kriemann2018,
  author    = {Kriemann, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Hineingerutscht? Die NATO und Deutschland im Kosovo-Krieg},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{WiemannBartels2018,
  author    = {Wiemann, Dirk and Bartels, Anke},
  title     = {Editorial - The Return of Politics},
  volume    = {101},
  number    = {1},
  issn      = {0171-1695},
  pages     = {i -- x},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {en}
}
@periodical{OPUS4-42432,
  title     = {Hard times : deutsch-englische Zeitschrift},
  volume    = {101},
  number    = {1},
  editor    = {Bartels, Anke and Christinidis, Georgia and Wiemann, Dirk},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam, Institut f{\"u}r Anglistik und Amerikanistik},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {0171-1695},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Wiemann2018,
  author    = {Wiemann, Dirk},
  title     = {"...saying what was previously unthinkable"},
  series = {Hard times : deutsch-englische Zeitschrift},
  volume    = {101},
  journal   = {Hard times : deutsch-englische Zeitschrift},
  number    = {1},
  issn      = {0171-1695},
  pages     = {15 -- 23},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Wieman2018,
  author    = {Wieman, Dirk},
  title     = {Make English Sweet Again!},
  series = {Hard times : deutsch-englische Zeitschrift},
  volume    = {101},
  journal   = {Hard times : deutsch-englische Zeitschrift},
  number    = {1},
  issn      = {0171-1695},
  pages     = {68 -- 76},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Pittel2018,
  author    = {Pittel, Harald},
  title     = {Fiction in Dark Times: the Brexit Novel and Ali Smith},
  series = {Hard times : deutsch-englische Zeitschrift},
  volume    = {101},
  journal   = {Hard times : deutsch-englische Zeitschrift},
  number    = {1},
  issn      = {0171-1695},
  pages     = {58 -- 67},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {de}
}