@book{WenholdMeierBeckmannetal.2008,
  author    = {Wenhold, Franziska and Meier, Caroline and Beckmann, J{\"u}rgen and Elbe, Anne-Marie and Ehrlenspiel, Felix},
  title     = {Sportpsychologische Eingangsdiagnostik - sportbezogene Motivation},
  isbn      = {978-3-86884-480-1},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{WenholdElbeBeckmann2009,
  author    = {Wenhold, Franziska and Elbe, Anne-Marie and Beckmann, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {Fragebogen zum Leistungsmotiv im Sport : Achievement Motives Scale-Sport (AMS-Sport)},
  publisher = {Sportverl. Strauß},
  address   = {K{\"o}ln},
  isbn      = {978-3-86884-494-8},
  pages     = {49 S.},
  year      = {2009},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{WenholdElbeBeckmann2009,
  author    = {Wenhold, Franziska and Elbe, Anne-Marie and Beckmann, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {Volitionale Komponenten im Sport : Fragebogen zur Erfassung volutionaler Komponenten im Sport (VKS)},
  publisher = {Sportverlag Strauß},
  address   = {K{\"o}ln},
  isbn      = {978-3-86884-509-9},
  pages     = {43 S.},
  year      = {2009},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{WenholdElbeBeckmann2009,
  author    = {Wenhold, Franziska and Elbe, Anne-Marie and Beckmann, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {Testg{\"u}tekriterien des Fragebogens VKS zur Erfassung volitionaler Komponenten im Sport},
  issn      = {1612-5010},
  doi       = {10.1026/1612-5010.16.3.91},
  year      = {2009},
  abstract  = {In this paper the psychometric quality of the sport-specific Volitional Components Questionnaire (VKS) is examined. After an item analysis, a factor analysis was undertaken resulted in the four factors self optimization, lack of activation, loss of focus, and self impediment. The questionnaire exhibits satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and retest reliability. In line with theory (Kuhl, 2001), correlations with the general questionnaire VCQ II (Kuhl \& Fuhrmann, 1998) and sport-specific action orientation as measured with the HOSP questionnaire (Beckmann, 2003) indcate construct validity. Validity can also be shown by correlations with the external criterion of expert rating by coaches. In addition, the VKS is able to differentiate between athletes who perform well and those who perforin poorly.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{WenholdElbe2008,
  author    = {Wenhold, Franziska and Elbe, Anne-Marie},
  title     = {The influence of the sport type on the development of the sport specific achievement motive in young elite athletes},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WenholdBeckmannElbeetal.2008,
  author    = {Wenhold, Franziska and Beckmann, J{\"u}rgen and Elbe, Anne-Marie and Ehrlenspiel, Felix},
  title     = {Testing achievement motivation and volition in sport},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WenholdBeckmannElbe2008,
  author    = {Wenhold, Franziska and Beckmann, J{\"u}rgen and Elbe, Anne-Marie},
  title     = {Systematische sportpsychologische Betreuung im Nachwuchsleistungssport},
  isbn      = {978-3-88020-506-2},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{StrahlerElbe2009,
  author    = {Strahler, Katharina and Elbe, Anne-Marie},
  title     = {Entwicklung einer Skala zur Erfassung psychogenen Harnverhaltens bei Athletinnen und Athleten w{\"a}hrend der Dopingkontrollen},
  issn      = {1612-5010},
  doi       = {10.1026/1612-5010.16.4.156},
  year      = {2009},
  language  = {de}
}
@unpublished{PetrocziBackhouseBarkoukisetal.2015,
  author    = {Petroczi, Andrea and Backhouse, Susan H. and Barkoukis, Vassilis and Brand, Ralf and Elbe, Anne-Marie and Lazuras, Larnbros and Lucidi, Fabio},
  title     = {A call for policy guidance on psychometric testing in doping control in sport},
  series = {International journal of drug policy},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {International journal of drug policy},
  number    = {11},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0955-3959},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.04.022},
  pages     = {1130 -- 1139},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {One of the fundamental challenges in anti-doping is identifying athletes who use, or are at risk of using, prohibited performance enhancing substances. The growing trend to employ a forensic approach to doping control aims to integrate information from social sciences (e.g., psychology of doping) into organised intelligence to protect clean sport. Beyond the foreseeable consequences of a positive identification as a doping user, this task is further complicated by the discrepancy between what constitutes a doping offence in the World Anti-Doping Code and operationalized in doping research. Whilst psychology plays an important role in developing our understanding of doping behaviour in order to inform intervention and prevention, its contribution to the array of doping diagnostic tools is still in its infancy. In both research and forensic settings, we must acknowledge that (1) socially desirable responding confounds self-reported psychometric test results and (2) that the cognitive complexity surrounding test performance means that the response-time based measures and the lie detector tests for revealing concealed life-events (e.g., doping use) are prone to produce false or non-interpretable outcomes in field settings. Differences in social-cognitive characteristics of doping behaviour that are tested at group level (doping users vs. non-users) cannot be extrapolated to individuals; nor these psychometric measures used for individual diagnostics. In this paper, we present a position statement calling for policy guidance on appropriate use of psychometric assessments in the pursuit of clean sport. We argue that, to date, both self-reported and response-time based psychometric tests for doping have been designed, tested and validated to explore how athletes feel and think about doping in order to develop a better understanding of doping behaviour, not to establish evidence for doping. A false 'positive' psychological profile for doping affects not only the individual 'clean' athlete but also their entourage, their organisation and sport itself. The proposed policy guidance aims to protect the global athletic community against social, ethical and legal consequences from potential misuse of psychological tests, including erroneous or incompetent applications as forensic diagnostic tools in both practice and research. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.},
  language  = {en}
}
@unpublished{PetrocziBackhouseBarkoukisetal.2015,
  author    = {Petroczi, Andrea and Backhouse, Susan H. and Barkoukis, Vassilis and Brand, Ralf and Elbe, Anne-Marie and Lazuras, Lambros and Lucidi, Fabio},
  title     = {A matter of mind-set in the interpretation of forensic application},
  series = {International journal of drug policy},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {International journal of drug policy},
  number    = {11},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0955-3959},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.06.007},
  pages     = {1142 -- 1143},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {en}
}