@book{AckermannAhlgrimmApelojgetal.2018,
  author    = {Ackermann, Peter and Ahlgrimm, Frederik and Apelojg, Benjamin and B{\"o}rnert-Ringleb, Moritz and Borowski, Andreas and Ehlert, Antje and Eichler, Constanze and Frohn, Julia and Gehrmann, Marie-Luise and Gerlach, Erin and Goetz, Ilka and Goral, Johanna and Gronostaj, Anna and Grubert, Jana and G{\"u}lery{\"u}z, Burak and Hacke, Alexander and Heck, Sebastian and Hermanns, Jolanda and Hochmuth, J{\"o}rg and Jennek, Julia and Jostes, Brigitte and Jurczok, Anne and Kleemann, Katrin and Kortenkamp, Ulrich and Krauskopf, Karsten and K{\"u}choll, Denise and Kulawiak, Pawel R. and Lauterbach, Wolfgang and Lazarides, Rebecca and Linka, Tim and L{\"o}weke, Sebastian and Lohse-Bossenz, Hendrik and Maar, Verena and Nowak, Anna and Ratzlaff, Olaf and Reitz-Koncebovski, Karen and Rother, Stefanie and Scherreiks, Lynn and Schroeder, Christoph and Schwalbe, Anja and Schwill, Andreas and Tosch, Frank and Vock, Miriam and Wagner, Luisa and Westphal, Andrea and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {PSI-Potsdam},
  series = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung},
  journal   = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung},
  number    = {1},
  editor    = {Borowski, Andreas and Ehlert, Antje and Prechtl, Helmut},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-442-5},
  issn      = {2626-3556},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-414542},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {354},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {In Brandenburg kommt der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam eine besondere Rolle zu: Sie ist die einzige, an der zuk{\"u}nftige Lehrerinnen und Lehrer die erste Phase ihres Werdegangs - das Lehramtsstudium - absolvieren k{\"o}nnen. Vor diesem Hintergrund wurde bereits kurz nach der Gr{\"u}ndung im Jahr 1991 das „Potsdamer Modell der Lehrerbildung" entwickelt. Dieses Modell strebt fortlaufend eine enge Verzahnung von Theorie und Praxis {\"u}ber das gesamte Studium hinweg an und bindet hierf{\"u}r die schulpraktischen Studienanteile in besonderer Weise ein. Eine erneute St{\"a}rkung erfuhr die Lehrerbildung im Dezember 2014 mit der Gr{\"u}ndung des Zentrums f{\"u}r Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung (ZeLB). Aus der koordinierenden Arbeit des Zentrums entstand das fakult{\"a}ts{\"u}bergreifende Projekt „Professionalisierung - Schulpraktische Studien - Inklusion" (PSI-Potsdam) das im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung des Bundesministeriums f{\"u}r Bildung und Forschung erfolgreich gef{\"o}rdert wurde (2015-2018) und dessen Verl{\"a}ngerung (2019-2023) bewilligt ist. Der vorliegende Band vermittelt in den drei großen Kapiteln „Erhebungsinstrumente", „Seminarkonzepte" und „Vernetzungen" einen {\"U}berblick {\"u}ber einige der praxisnahen Forschungszug{\"a}nge, hochschuldidaktischen Ans{\"a}tze und Strategien zur Vernetzung innerhalb der Lehrerbildung, die im Rahmen von PSI-Potsdam entwickelt und umgesetzt wurden. Die Beitr{\"a}ge wurden mit dem Ziel verfasst, Kolleginnen und Kollegen an Universit{\"a}ten und Hochschulen, Akteur_innen des Vorbereitungsdiensts sowie der Fort- und Weiterbildung von Lehrkr{\"a}ften m{\"o}glichst konkrete Einblicke zu gew{\"a}hren. Unter der Herausgeberschaft von Prof. Dr. Andreas Borowski (Fachdidaktik Physik), Prof. Dr. Antje Ehlert (Inklusionsp{\"a}dagogik mit dem F{\"o}rderschwerpunkt Lernen) und Prof. Dr. Helmut Prechtl (Fachdidaktik Biologie) vereinen sich Autor_innen mit breit gestreuter fachdidaktischer und bildungswissenschaftlicher Expertise.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BorowskiGlowinski2018,
  author    = {Borowski, Andreas and Glowinski, Ingrid},
  title     = {Vorwort},
  series = {Koh{\"a}renz in der universit{\"a}ren Lehrerbildung},
  journal   = {Koh{\"a}renz in der universit{\"a}ren Lehrerbildung},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-438-8},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-418503},
  pages     = {9 -- 13},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{BorowskiGlowinskiFristeretal.2018,
  author    = {Borowski, Andreas and Glowinski, Ingrid and Frister, Jonas and H{\"o}ttecke, Dietmar and Buth, Katrin and Koenen, Jenna and Masanek, Nicole and Reichwein, Wilko and Scholten, Nina and Sprenger, Sandra and Stender, Peter and W{\"o}hlke, Carina and Komorek, Michael and Freckmann, Janine and Hofmann, Josefine and Niesel, Verena and Richter, Chris and Mehlmann, Nelli and Bikner-Ahsbahs, Angelika and Unverricht, Katja and Schanze, Sascha and Bittorf, Robert Marten and Meier, Monique and Grospietsch, Finja and Mayer, J{\"u}rgen and Gimbel, Katharina and Ziepprecht, Kathrin and Hofmann, Judith and Kramer, Charlotte and M{\"u}ller, Britta-Kornelia and Rohde, Andreas and Z{\"u}hlsdorf, Felix and Winkler, Iris and Laging, Ralf and Peter, Carina and Schween, Michael and H{\"a}rle, Gerhard and Busse, Beatrix and Mahner, Sebastian and K{\"o}stler, Verena and Kufner, Sabrina and M{\"a}gdefrau, Jutta and M{\"u}ller, Christian and Beck, Christina and Kriehuber, Eva and Boch, Florian and Engl, Anna-Teresa and Helzel, Andreas and Pickert, Tina and Reiter, Christian and Blasini, Bettina and Nerdel, Claudia and Lewalter, Doris and Schiffhauer, Silke and Richter-Gebert, J{\"u}rgen and Bannert, Maria and Maahs, Mirjam and Reißner, Maria and Ungar, Patrizia and von Wachter, Jana-Kristin and Hellmann, Katharina and Zaki, Katja and Pohlenz, Philipp},
  title     = {Koh{\"a}renz in der universit{\"a}ren Lehrerbildung},
  editor    = {Glowinski, Ingrid and Borowski, Andreas and Gillen, Julia and Schanze, Sascha and von Meien, Joachim},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-438-8},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-414267},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {One area that is supported by the project "Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung" (funded by BMBF) is the improvement of collaboration and coordination between studies in the discipline, studies in pedagogical content knowledge, and studies in pedagogical knowledge during teacher education at university. Aiming a better coordination among these three parts of teacher education at university, many of the supported projects have designed and realized university-specific approaches. This conference proceedings volume comprises contributions by 15 of these projects. Seven of those were introduced and discussed in workshops on the occasion of two cross-regional project-conferences in Hannover and Potsdam. Overall, the contributions give a theoretically funded as well as a practice-oriented overview of current approaches and concepts to achieve a better connection between study units concerning studies in content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge in teacher education. The volume presents university projects, which take effect on different levels (at the level of curriculum and content, at a collegiate level, at the level of structural conditions of universities). The different approaches are described in a way that they can provide a basis for transfer to other subjects or further universities. The contributions are aimed at teacher educators as well as other actors working in the field of teaching- and quality development at universities. All of them can take transferable ideas and impulses from the described concepts and formats.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BorowskiLohwasser2018,
  author    = {Borowski, Andreas and Lohwaßer, Roswitha},
  title     = {Grußworte},
  series = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung},
  journal   = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-442-5},
  issn      = {2626-3556},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-420149},
  pages     = {9 -- 10},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BuschhueterSpodenBorowski2017,
  author    = {Buschh{\"u}ter, David and Spoden, Christian and Borowski, Andreas},
  title     = {Physics knowledge of first semester physics students in Germany},
  series = {International journal of science education},
  volume    = {39},
  journal   = {International journal of science education},
  number    = {9},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {0950-0693},
  doi       = {10.1080/09500693.2017.1318457},
  pages     = {1109 -- 1132},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Over the last decades, the percentage of the age group choosing to pursue university studies has increased significantly across the world. At the same time, there are university teachers who believe that the standards have fallen. There is little research on whether students nowadays demonstrate knowledge or abilities similar to that of the preceding cohorts. However, in times of educational expansion, empirical evidence on student test performance is extremely helpful in evaluating how well educational systems cope with the increasing numbers of students. In this study, we compared a sample of 2322 physics freshmen from 2013 with another sample of 2718 physics freshmen from 1978 at universities in Germany with regard to their physics knowledge based on their results in the same entrance test. Previous results on mathematics knowledge and abilities in the same sample of students indicated that there was no severe decline in their average achievement. This paper compares the physics knowledge of the same two samples of students. Contrary to their mathematics results, their physics results showed a substantial decrease in physics knowledge as measured by the test.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GlowinskiUnverrichtBorowski2018,
  author    = {Glowinski, Ingrid and Unverricht, Katja and Borowski, Andreas},
  title     = {Erweitertes Fachwissen f{\"u}r den schulischen Kontext als konzeptuelle Grundlage von berufsspezifischen Anteilen des fachwissenschaftlichen Studiums sowie von Fachdidaktik und Fachwissenschaft vernetzenden Lehrveranstaltungen},
  series = {Koh{\"a}renz in der universit{\"a}ren Lehrerbildung},
  journal   = {Koh{\"a}renz in der universit{\"a}ren Lehrerbildung},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-438-8},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-418535},
  pages     = {103 -- 124},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{HermannsBoehmeMeyeringetal.2023,
  author    = {Hermanns, Jolanda and B{\"o}hme, Katrin and Meyering, Meike and Fuchs, Isabelle and Wagner, Simon and Krauskopf, Karsten and Knigge, Michel and Rother, Stefanie and Tosch, Frank and Wendland, Mirko and Wulff, Peter and Mientus, Lukas and Nowak, Anna and Borowski, Andreas and Baer, Ella and Bosch, Jannis and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Br{\"a}sel, Tim and Fenn, Monika and Kortenkamp, Ulrich and Kuzle, Ana and Reitz-Koncebovski, Karen and Burg, Paula and Lampart, Fabian and Leubner, Martin and Freitag-Hild, Britta and Bitmann, Anna and Reinhardt, Susanne and Roos, Jana and Hußner, Isabell and B{\"o}rner, Dustin and Lazarides, Rebecca and Glowinski, Ingrid and Autenrieth, Marijke and Radke, Thea and Ehlert, Antje and Menke, Anne and Haupenthal, Anna and Schramm, Satyam Antonio and Kruse, Julia and K{\"o}rner, Dorothea and Fischer, Jakob Thomas and Kayser, Daniela Niesta},
  title     = {PSI-Potsdam},
  series = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge f{\"u}r Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung und Bildungsforschung},
  journal   = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge f{\"u}r Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung und Bildungsforschung},
  number    = {3},
  editor    = {Hermanns, Jolanda},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-568-2},
  issn      = {2626-3556},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-60187},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-601875},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {393},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {An der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam wird seit 2015 im Rahmen der „Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung" das Projekt „Professionalisierung - Schulpraktische Studien - Inklusion" (PSI-Potsdam) durchgef{\"u}hrt und am Zentrum f{\"u}r Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung (ZeLB) koordiniert. Zur ersten Projektf{\"o}rderphase (2015-2018) erschien der Band „PSI-Potsdam - Ergebnisbericht zu den Aktivit{\"a}ten im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung (2015-2018)" zum Auftakt der Reihe „Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung". Der vorliegende Band aus der gleichen Reihe gibt in den Kapiteln „Erhebungen", „Lehrkonzepte" und „Vernetzungen" einen {\"U}berblick {\"u}ber alle Teilprojekte der zweiten Projektf{\"o}rderphase (2019-2023). Wissenschaftler:innen aus verschiedenen Fachdidaktiken, Fachwissenschaften sowie aus den Bildungswissenschaften und der Inklusionsp{\"a}dagogik haben im Rahmen des Projektes kooperiert. Sowohl praxisnahe Forschung als auch die Entwicklung neuer Lehrkonzepte sowie Strategien zur Vernetzung innerhalb der Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung stehen im Fokus dieses Bandes. Die Praxisphasen, die im Rahmen des „Potsdamer Modells der Lehrerbildung" eine zentrale Rolle spielen, wurden in einer großen Studie {\"u}ber alle Praxisphasen untersucht. Der Band gibt interessante Einblicke in die Ergebnisse der Teilprojekte und Anregungen sowohl f{\"u}r die eigene Forschung als auch f{\"u}r Entwicklungsarbeit wie zum Beispiel die Entwicklung neuer Lehrkonzepte. Herausgegeben wird dieser Band von PD Dr. Jolanda Hermanns (Gesamtkoordinatorin PSI-Potsdam und Chemiedidaktikerin).},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KirschnerBorowskiFischeretal.2016,
  author    = {Kirschner, Sophie and Borowski, Andreas and Fischer, Hans E. and Gess-Newsome, Julie and von Aufschnaiter, Claudia},
  title     = {Developing and evaluating a paper-and-pencil test to assess components},
  series = {International journal of science education},
  volume    = {38},
  journal   = {International journal of science education},
  publisher = {Royal Society of Chemistry},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {0950-0693},
  doi       = {10.1080/09500693.2016.1190479},
  pages     = {1343 -- 1372},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Teachers' professional knowledge is assumed to be a key variable for effective teaching. As teacher education has the goal to enhance professional knowledge of current and future teachers, this knowledge should be described and assessed. Nevertheless, only a limited number of studies quantitatively measures physics teachers' professional knowledge. The study reported in this paper was part of a bigger project with the broader goal of understanding teacher professional knowledge. We designed a test instrument to assess the professional knowledge of physics teachers (N = 186) in the dimensions of content knowledge (CK), pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), and pedagogical knowledge (PK). A model describing the relationships between these three dimensions of professional knowledge was created to inform the design of the tests used to measure CK, PCK, and PK. In this paper, we describe the model with particular emphasis on the PCK part, and the subsequent PCK test development and its implementation in detail. We report different approaches to evaluate the PCK test, including the description of content validity, the examination of the internal structure of professional knowledge, and the analysis of construct validity by testing teachers across different school subjects, teachers from different school types, pre-service teachers, and physicists. Our findings demonstrate that our PCK test results could distinguish physics teachers from the other groups tested. The PCK test results could not be explained by teachers' CK or PK, cognitive abilities, computational skills, or science knowledge.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KranjcHorvatWienerSchmelingetal.2022,
  author    = {Kranjc Horvat, Anja and Wiener, Jeff and Schmeling, Sascha and Borowski, Andreas},
  title     = {Learning goals of professional development programs at science research institutions},
  series = {Journal of science teacher education : the official journal of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science},
  volume    = {33},
  journal   = {Journal of science teacher education : the official journal of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {1046-560X},
  doi       = {10.1080/1046560X.2021.1905330},
  pages     = {32 -- 54},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Effective professional development programs (PDPs) rely on well-defined goals. However, recent studies on PDPs have not explored the goals from a multi-stakeholder perspective. This study identifies the most important learning goals of PDPs at science research institutions as perceived by four groups of stakeholders, namely teachers, education researchers, government representatives, and research scientists. Altogether, over 100 stakeholders from 42 countries involved in PDPs at science research institutions in Europe and North America participated in a three-round Delphi study. In the first round, the stakeholders provided their opinions on what they thought the learning goals of PDPs should be through an open-ended questionnaire. In the second and third rounds, the stakeholders assessed the importance of the learning goals that emerged from the first round by rating and ranking them, respectively. The outcome of the study is a hierarchical list of the ten most important learning goals of PDPs at particle physics laboratories. The stakeholders identified enhancing teachers' knowledge of scientific concepts and models and enhancing their knowledge of the curricula as the most important learning goals. Furthermore, the results show strong agreement between all the stakeholder groups regarding the defined learning goals. Indeed, all groups ranked the learning goals by their perceived importance almost identically. These outcomes could help policymakers establish more specific policies for PDPs. Additionally, they provide PDP practitioners at science research institutions with a solid base for future research and planning endeavors.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KulgemeyerBorowskiBuschhueteretal.2020,
  author    = {Kulgemeyer, Christoph and Borowski, Andreas and Buschh{\"u}ter, David and Enkrott, Patrick and Kempin, Maren and Reinhold, Peter and Riese, Josef and Schecker, Horst and Schr{\"o}der, Jan and Vogelsang, Christoph},
  title     = {Professional knowledge affects action-related skills},
  series = {Journal of research in science teaching : the official journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching},
  volume    = {57},
  journal   = {Journal of research in science teaching : the official journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching},
  number    = {10},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {0022-4308},
  doi       = {10.1002/tea.21632},
  pages     = {1554 -- 1582},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Professional knowledge is an important source of science teachers' actions in the classroom (e.g., personal professional content knowledge [pedagogical content knowledge, PCK] is the source of enacted PCK in the refined consensus model [RCM] for PCK). However, the evidence for this claim is ambiguous at best. This study applied a cross-lagged panel design to examine the relationship between professional knowledge and actions in one particular instructional situation: explaining physics. Pre- and post a field experience (one semester), 47 preservice physics teachers from four different universities were tested for their content knowledge (CK), PCK, pedagogical knowledge (PK), and action-related skills in explaining physics. The study showed that joint professional knowledge (the weighted sum of CK, PCK, and PK scores) at the beginning of the field experience impacted the development of explaining skills during the field experience (beta = .38**). We interpret this as a particular relationship between professional knowledge and science teachers' action-related skills (enacted PCK): professional knowledge is necessary for the development of explaining skills. That is evidence that personal PCK affects enacted PCK. In addition, field experiences are often supposed to bridge the theory-practice gap by transforming professional knowledge into instructional practice. Our results suggest that for field experiences to be effective, preservice teachers should start with profound professional knowledge.},
  language  = {en}
}