@misc{BorckGohl2022, author = {Borck, Rainald and Gohl, Niklas}, title = {Steigende Mieten?}, series = {{\"O}konomenstimme}, journal = {{\"O}konomenstimme}, publisher = {KOF Konjunkturforschungsstelle der ETH Z{\"u}rich}, address = {Z{\"u}rich}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Vor dem Hintergrund rasant steigender Mieten in deutschen Großst{\"a}dten untersuchen wir in einer neuen Studie die Auswirkungen von Gentrifizierung sowie von politischen Gegenmaßnahmen auf unterschiedliche Einkommensgruppen anhand eines quantitativen Modells f{\"u}r Berlin. Wir finden, dass eine Mietpreisbindung (wie der „Mietendeckel") allen Haushalten, vor allem aber den {\"a}rmeren Haushalten, schadet. Andere Maßnahmen wie Neubau oder direkte Subventionen schneiden besser ab.}, language = {de} } @incollection{Borck2023, author = {Borck, Rainald}, title = {Energy policies, agglomeration, and pollution}, series = {Handbook of labor, human resources and population economics}, booktitle = {Handbook of labor, human resources and population economics}, editor = {Zimmermann, Klaus F.}, publisher = {Springer International Publishing}, address = {Cham}, isbn = {978-3-319-57365-6}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_421-1}, pages = {1 -- 15}, year = {2023}, abstract = {This chapter reviews the interplay of agglomeration and pollution as well as the effect of energy policies on pollution in an urban context. It starts by describing the effect of agglomeration on pollution. While this effect is theoretically ambiguous, empirical research tends to find that larger cities are more polluted, but per capita emissions fall with city size. The chapter discusses the implications for optimal city size. Conversely, urban pollution tends to discourage agglomeration if larger cities are more exposed to pollution. The chapter then considers various energy policies and their effect on urban pollution. Specifically, it looks at the effects of energy and transport policies as well as urban policies such as zoning.}, language = {en} } @article{BorckSchrauth2020, author = {Borck, Rainald and Schrauth, Philipp}, title = {Population density and urban air quality}, series = {Regional science and urban economics}, volume = {86}, journal = {Regional science and urban economics}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0166-0462}, doi = {10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2020.103596}, pages = {24}, year = {2020}, abstract = {We use panel data from Germany to analyze the effect of population density on urban air pollution (nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, ozone, and an aggregate index for bad air quality [AQI]). To address unobserved heterogeneity and omitted variables, we present long difference/fixed effects estimates and instrumental variables estimates, using historical population and soil quality as instruments. Using our preferred estimates, we find that the concentration increases with density for NO2 with an elasticity of 0.25 and particulate matter with elasticity of 0.08. The O-3 concentration decreases with density with an elasticity of -0.14. The AQI increases with density, with an elasticity of 0.11-0.13. We also present a variety of robustness tests. Overall, the paper shows that higher population density worsens local air quality.}, language = {en} } @techreport{BorckSchrauth2022, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Borck, Rainald and Schrauth, Philipp}, title = {Urban pollution}, series = {CEPA Discussion Papers}, journal = {CEPA Discussion Papers}, number = {60}, issn = {2628-653X}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-57204}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-572049}, pages = {48}, year = {2022}, abstract = {We use worldwide satellite data to analyse how population size and density affect urban pollution. We find that density significantly increases pollution exposure. Looking only at urban areas, we find that population size affects exposure more than density. Moreover, the effect is driven mostly by population commuting to core cities rather than the core city population itself. We analyse heterogeneity by geography and income levels. By and large, the influence of population on pollution is greatest in Asia and middle-income countries. A counterfactual simulation shows that PM2.5 exposure would fall by up to 36\% and NO2 exposure up to 53\% if within countries population size were equalized across all cities.}, language = {en} } @techreport{BorckOshiroSatō2022, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Borck, Rainald and Oshiro, Jun and Satō, Yasuhiro}, title = {Property tax competition}, series = {CEPA Discussion Papers}, journal = {CEPA Discussion Papers}, issn = {2628-653X}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-56222}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-562228}, pages = {71}, year = {2022}, abstract = {We develop a model of property taxation and characterize equilibria under three alternative taxa-tion regimes often used in the public finance literature: decentralized taxation, centralized taxation, and "rent seeking" regimes. We show that decentralized taxation results in inefficiently high tax rates, whereas centralized taxation yields a common optimal tax rate, and tax rates in the rent-seeking regime can be either inefficiently high or low. We quantify the effects of switching from the observed tax system to the three regimes for Japan and Germany. The decentralized or rent-seeking regime best describes the Japanese tax system, whereas the centralized regime does so for Germany. We also quantify the welfare effects of regime changes.}, language = {en} } @article{BorckBrueckner2018, author = {Borck, Rainald and Brueckner, Jan K.}, title = {Optimal energy taxation in cities}, series = {Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists : JAERE}, volume = {5}, journal = {Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists : JAERE}, number = {2}, publisher = {University of Chicago Press}, address = {Chicago}, issn = {2333-5955}, doi = {10.1086/695614}, pages = {481 -- 516}, year = {2018}, abstract = {This paper presents the first investigation of the effects of optimal energy taxation in an urban spatial setting, where emissions are produced both by residences and commuting. When levying an optimal direct tax on energy or carbon use is not feasible, the analysis shows that exactly the same adjustments in resource allocation can be generated by the combination of a land tax, a housing tax, and a commuting tax. We then analyze the effects of these taxes on urban spatial structure, showing that they reduce the extent of commuting and the level of housing consumption while increasing building heights, generating a more-compact city with a lower level of emissions per capita.}, language = {en} } @techreport{BorckGohl2021, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Borck, Rainald and Gohl, Niklas}, title = {Gentrification and Affordable Housing Policies}, series = {CEPA Discussion Papers}, journal = {CEPA Discussion Papers}, number = {39}, issn = {2628-653X}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-52930}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-529300}, pages = {51}, year = {2021}, abstract = {We use a quantitative spatial equilibrium model to evaluate the distributional and welfare impacts of a recent temporary rent control policy in Berlin, Germany. We calibrate the model to key features of Berlin's housing market, in particular the recent gentrification of inner city locations. As expected, gentrification benefits rich homeowners, while poor renter households lose. Our counterfactual analysis mimicks the rent control policy. We find that this policy reduces welfare for rich and poor households and in fact, the percentage change in welfare is largest for the poorest households. We also study alternative affordable housing policies such as subsidies and re-zoning policies, which are better suited to address the adverse consequences of gentrification.}, language = {en} } @article{BorckWrede2018, author = {Borck, Rainald and Wrede, Matthias}, title = {Spatial and social mobility}, series = {Journal of Regional Science}, volume = {58}, journal = {Journal of Regional Science}, number = {4}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {0022-4146}, doi = {10.1111/jors.12382}, pages = {688 -- 704}, year = {2018}, abstract = {This paper analyzes the relationship between spatial mobility and social mobility. It develops a two-skill-type spatial equilibrium model of two regions with location preferences where each region consists of an urban area that is home to workplaces and residences and an exclusively residential suburban area. The paper demonstrates that relative regional social mobility is negatively correlated with segregation and inequality. In the model, segregation, income inequality, and social mobility are driven by differences between urban and residential areas in commuting cost differences between high-skilled and low-skilled workers, and also by the magnitude of taste heterogeneity.}, language = {en} } @article{Borck2019, author = {Borck, Rainald}, title = {Public transport and urban pollution}, series = {Regional science and urban economics}, volume = {77}, journal = {Regional science and urban economics}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0166-0462}, doi = {10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.06.005}, pages = {356 -- 366}, year = {2019}, abstract = {This paper studies the effect of public transport policies on urban pollution. It uses a quantitative equilibrium model with residential choice and mode choice. Pollution comes from commuting and residential energy use. The model parameters are calibrated to replicate key variables for American metropolitan areas. In the counterfactual, I study how free public transport coupled with increasing transit speed affects the equilibrium. In the baseline simulation, total pollution falls by 0.4\%, as decreasing emissions from transport are partly offset by rising residential emissions. A second counterfactual compares a city with and without public transit. This large investment decreases pollution by 1.7\%. When jobs are decentralized, emissions fall by 0.5\% in the first and by 3\% in the second counterfactual.}, language = {en} } @article{BorckPflueger2019, author = {Borck, Rainald and Pfl{\"u}ger, Michael}, title = {Green cities? Urbanization, trade, and the environment}, series = {Journal of regional science}, volume = {59}, journal = {Journal of regional science}, number = {4}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {0022-4146}, doi = {10.1111/jors.12423}, pages = {743 -- 766}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Is urbanization good for the environment? This paper establishes a simple core-periphery model with monocentric cities, which comprises key forces that shape the structure and interrelation of cities to study the impact of the urban evolution on the environment. We focus on global warming and the potential of unfettered market forces to economize on emissions. The model parameters are chosen to match the dichotomy between average "large" and "small" cities in the urban geography of the United States, and the sectoral greenhouse gas emissions recorded for the United States. Based on numerical analyzes we find that a forced switch to a system with equally sized cities reduces total emissions. Second, any city driver which pronounces the asymmetry between the core and the periphery drives up emissions in the total city system, too, and the endogenous adjustment of the urban system accounts for the bulk of the change in emissions. Third, none of the city drivers gives rise to an urban environmental Kuznets curve according to our numerical simulations. Finally, the welfare-maximizing allocation tends to involve dispersion of cities and the more so the higher is the marginal damage from pollution.}, language = {en} }