@article{BoernertRinglebWestphalZarubaetal.2020, author = {B{\"o}rnert-Ringleb, Moritz and Westphal, Andrea and Zaruba, Nicole and Gutmann, Franziska and Vock, Miriam}, title = {The relationship between attitudes toward inclusion, beliefs about teaching and learning, and subsequent automatic evaluations amongst student teachers}, series = {Frontiers in education}, volume = {5}, journal = {Frontiers in education}, publisher = {Frontiers Media}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {2504-284X}, doi = {10.3389/feduc.2020.584464}, pages = {11}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Teachers' attitudes toward inclusion are frequently cited as being an important predictor of how successfully a given inclusive school system is implemented. At the same time, beliefs about the nature of teaching and learning are discussed as a possible predictor of attitudes toward inclusion. However, more recent research emphasizes the need of considering implicit processes, such as automatic evaluations, when describing attitudes and beliefs. Previous evidence on the association of attitudes toward inclusion and beliefs about teaching and learning is solely based on explicit reports. Therefore, this study aims to examine the relationship between attitudes toward inclusion, beliefs about teaching and learning, and the subsequent automatic evaluations of pre-service teachers (N = 197). The results revealed differences between pre-service teachers' explicit attitudes/beliefs and their subsequent automatic evaluations. Differences in the relationship between attitudes toward inclusion and beliefs about teaching and learning occur when teachers focus either on explicit measures or automatic evaluations. These differences might be due to different facets of the same attitude object being represented. Relying solely on either explicit measures or automatic evaluations at the exclusion of the other might lead to erroneous assumptions about the relation of attitudes toward inclusion and beliefs about teaching and learning.}, language = {en} } @misc{WilbertBoernertRinglebLueke2022, author = {Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and B{\"o}rnert-Ringleb, Moritz and L{\"u}ke, Timo}, title = {Statistical Power of Piecewise Regression Analyses of Single-Case Experimental Studies Addressing Behavior Problems}, series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {814}, issn = {1866-8364}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-58115}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-581150}, pages = {13}, year = {2022}, abstract = {In intervention research, single-case experimental designs are an important way to gain insights into the causes of individual changes that yield high internal validity. They are commonly applied to examine the effectiveness of classroom-based interventions to reduce problem behavior in schools. At the same time, there is no consensus on good design characteristics of single-case experimental designs when dealing with behavioral problems in schools. Moreover, specific challenges arise concerning appropriate approaches to analyzing behavioral data. Our study addresses the interplay between the test power of piecewise regression analysis and important design specifications of single-case research designs. Here, we focus on the influence of the following specifications of single-case research designs: number of measurement times, the initial frequency of the behavior, intervention effect, and data trend. We conducted a Monte-Carlo study. First, simulated datasets were created with specific design conditions based on reviews of published single-case intervention studies. Following, data were analyzed using piecewise Poisson-regression models, and the influence of specific design specifications on the test power was investigated. Our results indicate that piecewise regressions have a high potential of adequately identifying the effects of interventions for single-case studies. At the same time, test power is strongly related to the specific design specifications of the single-case study: Few measurement times, especially in phase A, and low initial frequencies of the behavior make it impossible to detect even large intervention effects. Research designs with a high number of measurement times show robust power. The insights gained are highly relevant for researchers in the field, as decisions during the early stage of conceptualizing and planning single-case experimental design studies may impact the chance to identify an existing intervention effect during the research process correctly.}, language = {en} } @article{WilbertBoernertRinglebLueke2022, author = {Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and B{\"o}rnert-Ringleb, Moritz and L{\"u}ke, Timo}, title = {Statistical Power of Piecewise Regression Analyses of Single-Case Experimental Studies Addressing Behavior Problems}, series = {Frontiers in Education}, volume = {7}, journal = {Frontiers in Education}, publisher = {Frontiers Media}, address = {Lausanne, Schweiz}, issn = {2504-284X}, doi = {10.3389/feduc.2022.917944}, pages = {1 -- 13}, year = {2022}, abstract = {In intervention research, single-case experimental designs are an important way to gain insights into the causes of individual changes that yield high internal validity. They are commonly applied to examine the effectiveness of classroom-based interventions to reduce problem behavior in schools. At the same time, there is no consensus on good design characteristics of single-case experimental designs when dealing with behavioral problems in schools. Moreover, specific challenges arise concerning appropriate approaches to analyzing behavioral data. Our study addresses the interplay between the test power of piecewise regression analysis and important design specifications of single-case research designs. Here, we focus on the influence of the following specifications of single-case research designs: number of measurement times, the initial frequency of the behavior, intervention effect, and data trend. We conducted a Monte-Carlo study. First, simulated datasets were created with specific design conditions based on reviews of published single-case intervention studies. Following, data were analyzed using piecewise Poisson-regression models, and the influence of specific design specifications on the test power was investigated. Our results indicate that piecewise regressions have a high potential of adequately identifying the effects of interventions for single-case studies. At the same time, test power is strongly related to the specific design specifications of the single-case study: Few measurement times, especially in phase A, and low initial frequencies of the behavior make it impossible to detect even large intervention effects. Research designs with a high number of measurement times show robust power. The insights gained are highly relevant for researchers in the field, as decisions during the early stage of conceptualizing and planning single-case experimental design studies may impact the chance to identify an existing intervention effect during the research process correctly.}, language = {en} } @article{KulawiakWilbertSchlacketal.2020, author = {Kulawiak, Pawel R. and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Schlack, Robert and B{\"o}rnert-Ringleb, Moritz}, title = {Prediction of child and adolescent outcomes with broadband and narrowband dimensions of internalizing and externalizing behavior using the child and adolescent version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire}, series = {PLOS ONE}, volume = {15}, journal = {PLOS ONE}, number = {10}, publisher = {PLOS}, address = {San Francisco, California}, issn = {1932-6203}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0240312}, pages = {17}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a frequently used screening instrument for behavioral problems in children and adolescents. There is an ongoing controversy—not only in educational research—regarding the factor structure of the SDQ. Research results speak for a 3-factor as well as a 5-factor structure. The narrowband scales (5-factor structure) can be combined into broadband scales (3-factor structure). The question remains: Which factors (narrowband vs. broadband) are better predictors? With the prediction of child and adolescent outcomes (academic grades, well-being, and self-belief), we evaluated whether the broadband scales of internalizing and externalizing behavior (3-factor structure) or narrowband scales of behavior (5-factor structure) are better suited for predictive purposes in a cross-sectional study setting. The sample includes students in grades 5 to 9 (N = 4642) from the representative German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS study). The results of model comparisons (broadband scale vs. narrowband scales) did not support the superiority of the broadband scales with regard to the prediction of child and adolescent outcomes. There is no benefit from subsuming narrowband scales (5-factor structure) into broadband scales (3-factor structure). The application of narrowband scales, providing a more differentiated picture of students' academic and social situation, was more appropriate for predictive purposes. For the purpose of identifying students at risk of struggling in educational contexts, using the set of narrowband dimensions of behavior seems to be more suitable.}, language = {en} } @misc{KulawiakWilbertSchlacketal.2020, author = {Kulawiak, Pawel R. and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Schlack, Robert and B{\"o}rnert-Ringleb, Moritz}, title = {Prediction of child and adolescent outcomes with broadband and narrowband dimensions of internalizing and externalizing behavior using the child and adolescent version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {669}, issn = {1866-8364}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-48515}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-485156}, pages = {19}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a frequently used screening instrument for behavioral problems in children and adolescents. There is an ongoing controversy—not only in educational research—regarding the factor structure of the SDQ. Research results speak for a 3-factor as well as a 5-factor structure. The narrowband scales (5-factor structure) can be combined into broadband scales (3-factor structure). The question remains: Which factors (narrowband vs. broadband) are better predictors? With the prediction of child and adolescent outcomes (academic grades, well-being, and self-belief), we evaluated whether the broadband scales of internalizing and externalizing behavior (3-factor structure) or narrowband scales of behavior (5-factor structure) are better suited for predictive purposes in a cross-sectional study setting. The sample includes students in grades 5 to 9 (N = 4642) from the representative German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS study). The results of model comparisons (broadband scale vs. narrowband scales) did not support the superiority of the broadband scales with regard to the prediction of child and adolescent outcomes. There is no benefit from subsuming narrowband scales (5-factor structure) into broadband scales (3-factor structure). The application of narrowband scales, providing a more differentiated picture of students' academic and social situation, was more appropriate for predictive purposes. For the purpose of identifying students at risk of struggling in educational contexts, using the set of narrowband dimensions of behavior seems to be more suitable.}, language = {en} } @article{GrubertKulawiakSchwalbeetal.2018, author = {Grubert, Jana and Kulawiak, Pawel R. and Schwalbe, Anja and Scherreiks, Lynn and B{\"o}rnert-Ringleb, Moritz and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen}, title = {Fragebogen zur Erfassung diagnostischer Kompetenzen hinsichtlich psychischer Auff{\"a}lligkeiten von Sch{\"u}ler_innen}, series = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung}, journal = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-442-5}, issn = {2626-4722}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-420167}, pages = {17 -- 27}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Die Diagnostik lernrelevanter Eigenschaften von Sch{\"u}ler_innen ist eine zentrale Kompetenz angehender und aktiver Lehrkr{\"a}fte. Auch psychische Auff{\"a}lligkeiten, also emotional-soziale Schwierigkeiten wie internalisierende und externalisierende Verhaltensweisen, k{\"o}nnen die betroffenen Sch{\"u}ler_innen belasten und somit deren akademische sowie emotional-soziale Entwicklung beeintr{\"a}chtigen. Grundlage einer angemessenen p{\"a}dagogischen und/oder psychotherapeutischen Intervention ist das fr{\"u}hzeitige und sachgerechte Erkennen von psychischen Auff{\"a}lligkeiten. Der vorliegende Beitrag thematisiert daher die diagnostischen Kompetenzen von Lehrkr{\"a}ften hinsichtlich psychischer Auff{\"a}lligkeiten von Sch{\"u}ler_innen sowie fachliche Gelingensbedingungen f{\"u}r diese diagnostischen Kompetenzen (Wissen, Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung, Verantwortungsempfinden). Darauf aufbauend wird ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung der diagnostischen Kompetenzen hinsichtlich psychischer Auff{\"a}lligkeiten vorgestellt und Einsatzm{\"o}glichkeiten des Fragebogenverfahrens diskutiert.}, language = {de} } @book{AckermannAhlgrimmApelojgetal.2018, author = {Ackermann, Peter and Ahlgrimm, Frederik and Apelojg, Benjamin and B{\"o}rnert-Ringleb, Moritz and Borowski, Andreas and Ehlert, Antje and Eichler, Constanze and Frohn, Julia and Gehrmann, Marie-Luise and Gerlach, Erin and Goetz, Ilka and Goral, Johanna and Gronostaj, Anna and Grubert, Jana and G{\"u}lery{\"u}z, Burak and Hacke, Alexander and Heck, Sebastian and Hermanns, Jolanda and Hochmuth, J{\"o}rg and Jennek, Julia and Jostes, Brigitte and Jurczok, Anne and Kleemann, Katrin and Kortenkamp, Ulrich and Krauskopf, Karsten and K{\"u}choll, Denise and Kulawiak, Pawel R. and Lauterbach, Wolfgang and Lazarides, Rebecca and Linka, Tim and L{\"o}weke, Sebastian and Lohse-Bossenz, Hendrik and Maar, Verena and Nowak, Anna and Ratzlaff, Olaf and Reitz-Koncebovski, Karen and Rother, Stefanie and Scherreiks, Lynn and Schroeder, Christoph and Schwalbe, Anja and Schwill, Andreas and Tosch, Frank and Vock, Miriam and Wagner, Luisa and Westphal, Andrea and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen}, title = {PSI-Potsdam}, series = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung}, journal = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung}, number = {1}, editor = {Borowski, Andreas and Ehlert, Antje and Prechtl, Helmut}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-442-5}, issn = {2626-3556}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-414542}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {354}, year = {2018}, abstract = {In Brandenburg kommt der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam eine besondere Rolle zu: Sie ist die einzige, an der zuk{\"u}nftige Lehrerinnen und Lehrer die erste Phase ihres Werdegangs - das Lehramtsstudium - absolvieren k{\"o}nnen. Vor diesem Hintergrund wurde bereits kurz nach der Gr{\"u}ndung im Jahr 1991 das „Potsdamer Modell der Lehrerbildung" entwickelt. Dieses Modell strebt fortlaufend eine enge Verzahnung von Theorie und Praxis {\"u}ber das gesamte Studium hinweg an und bindet hierf{\"u}r die schulpraktischen Studienanteile in besonderer Weise ein. Eine erneute St{\"a}rkung erfuhr die Lehrerbildung im Dezember 2014 mit der Gr{\"u}ndung des Zentrums f{\"u}r Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung (ZeLB). Aus der koordinierenden Arbeit des Zentrums entstand das fakult{\"a}ts{\"u}bergreifende Projekt „Professionalisierung - Schulpraktische Studien - Inklusion" (PSI-Potsdam) das im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung des Bundesministeriums f{\"u}r Bildung und Forschung erfolgreich gef{\"o}rdert wurde (2015-2018) und dessen Verl{\"a}ngerung (2019-2023) bewilligt ist. Der vorliegende Band vermittelt in den drei großen Kapiteln „Erhebungsinstrumente", „Seminarkonzepte" und „Vernetzungen" einen {\"U}berblick {\"u}ber einige der praxisnahen Forschungszug{\"a}nge, hochschuldidaktischen Ans{\"a}tze und Strategien zur Vernetzung innerhalb der Lehrerbildung, die im Rahmen von PSI-Potsdam entwickelt und umgesetzt wurden. Die Beitr{\"a}ge wurden mit dem Ziel verfasst, Kolleginnen und Kollegen an Universit{\"a}ten und Hochschulen, Akteur_innen des Vorbereitungsdiensts sowie der Fort- und Weiterbildung von Lehrkr{\"a}ften m{\"o}glichst konkrete Einblicke zu gew{\"a}hren. Unter der Herausgeberschaft von Prof. Dr. Andreas Borowski (Fachdidaktik Physik), Prof. Dr. Antje Ehlert (Inklusionsp{\"a}dagogik mit dem F{\"o}rderschwerpunkt Lernen) und Prof. Dr. Helmut Prechtl (Fachdidaktik Biologie) vereinen sich Autor_innen mit breit gestreuter fachdidaktischer und bildungswissenschaftlicher Expertise.}, language = {de} } @article{BoernertRinglebWilbert2018, author = {B{\"o}rnert-Ringleb, Moritz and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen}, title = {The Association of Strategy Use and Concrete-Operational Thinking in Primary School}, series = {Frontiers in Education}, volume = {3}, journal = {Frontiers in Education}, publisher = {Frontiers Media}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {2504-284X}, doi = {10.3389/feduc.2018.00038}, pages = {1 -- 11}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Concrete-operational thinking depicts an important aspect of cognitive development. A promising approach in promoting these skills is the instruction of strategies. The construction of such instructional programs requires insights into the mental operations involved in problem-solving. In the present paper, we address the question to which extent variations of the effect of isolated and combined mental operations (strategies) on correct solution of concrete-operational concepts can be observed. Therefore, a cross-sectional design was applied. The use of mental operations was measured by thinking-aloud reports from 80 first- and second-graders (N = 80) while solving tasks depicting concrete-operational thinking. Concrete-operational thinking was assessed using the subscales conservation of numbers, classification and sequences of the TEKO. The verbal reports were transcribed and coded with regard to the mental operations applied per task. Data analyses focused on tasks level, resulting in the analyses of N = 240 tasks per subscale. Differences regarding the contribution of isolated and combined mental operations (strategies) to correct solution were observed. Thereby, the results indicate the necessity of selection and integration of appropriate mental operations as strategies. The results offer insights in involved mental operations while solving concrete-operational tasks and depict a contribution to the construction of instructional programs.}, language = {en} } @misc{BoernertRinglebWilbert2018, author = {B{\"o}rnert-Ringleb, Moritz and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen}, title = {The Association of Strategy Use and Concrete-Operational Thinking in Primary School}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {431}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-162010}, pages = {11}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Concrete-operational thinking depicts an important aspect of cognitive development. A promising approach in promoting these skills is the instruction of strategies. The construction of such instructional programs requires insights into the mental operations involved in problem-solving. In the present paper, we address the question to which extent variations of the effect of isolated and combined mental operations (strategies) on correct solution of concrete-operational concepts can be observed. Therefore, a cross-sectional design was applied. The use of mental operations was measured by thinking-aloud reports from 80 first- and second-graders (N = 80) while solving tasks depicting concrete-operational thinking. Concrete-operational thinking was assessed using the subscales conservation of numbers, classification and sequences of the TEKO. The verbal reports were transcribed and coded with regard to the mental operations applied per task. Data analyses focused on tasks level, resulting in the analyses of N = 240 tasks per subscale. Differences regarding the contribution of isolated and combined mental operations (strategies) to correct solution were observed. Thereby, the results indicate the necessity of selection and integration of appropriate mental operations as strategies. The results offer insights in involved mental operations while solving concrete-operational tasks and depict a contribution to the construction of instructional programs.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{BoernertRingleb2017, author = {B{\"o}rnert-Ringleb, Moritz}, title = {Dynamisches Testen in der sonderp{\"a}dagogischen Diagnostik}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {114}, year = {2017}, language = {de} }