@article{SchubertJonssonChangetal.2014,
  author    = {Schubert, Mikkel and Jonsson, Hakon and Chang, Dan and Sarkissian, Clio Der and Ermini, Luca and Ginolhac, Aurelien and Albrechtsen, Anders and Dupanloup, Isabelle and Foucal, Adrien and Petersen, Bent Larsen and Fumagalli, Matteo and Raghavan, Maanasa and Seguin-Orlando, Andaine and Korneliussen, Thorfinn S. and Velazquez, Amhed M. V. and Stenderup, Jesper and Hoover, Cindi A. and Rubin, Carl-Johan and Alfarhan, Ahmed H. and Alquraishi, Saleh A. and Al-Rasheid, Khaled A. S. and MacHugh, David E. and Kalbfleisch, Ted and MacLeod, James N. and Rubin, Edward M. and Sicheritz-Ponten, Thomas and Andersson, Leif and Hofreiter, Michael and Marques-Bonet, Tomas and Gilbert, M. Thomas P. and Nielsen, Rasmus and Excoffier, Laurent and Willerslev, Eske and Shapiro, Beth and Orlando, Ludovic},
  title     = {Prehistoric genomes reveal the genetic foundation and cost of horse domestication},
  series = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
  volume    = {111},
  journal   = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
  number    = {52},
  publisher = {National Acad. of Sciences},
  address   = {Washington},
  issn      = {0027-8424},
  doi       = {10.1073/pnas.1416991111},
  pages     = {E5661 -- E5669},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BarnettWestburySandovalVelascoetal.2020,
  author    = {Barnett, Ross and Westbury, Michael V. and Sandoval-Velasco, Marcela and Vieira, Filipe Garrett and Jeon, Sungwon and Zazula, Grant and Martin, Michael D. and Ho, Simon Y. W. and Mather, Niklas and Gopalakrishnan, Shyam and Ramos-Madrigal, Jazmin and de Manuel, Marc and Zepeda-Mendoza, M. Lisandra and Antunes, Agostinho and Baez, Aldo Carmona and De Cahsan, Binia and Larson, Greger and O'Brien, Stephen J. and Eizirik, Eduardo and Johnson, Warren E. and Koepfli, Klaus-Peter and Wilting, Andreas and Fickel, J{\"o}rns and Dalen, Love and Lorenzen, Eline D. and Marques-Bonet, Tomas and Hansen, Anders J. and Zhang, Guojie and Bhak, Jong and Yamaguchi, Nobuyuki and Gilbert, M. Thomas P.},
  title     = {Genomic adaptations and evolutionary history of the extinct scimitar-toothed cat},
  series = {Current biology},
  volume    = {30},
  journal   = {Current biology},
  number    = {24},
  publisher = {Cell Press},
  address   = {Cambridge},
  issn      = {0960-9822},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.cub.2020.09.051},
  pages     = {14},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Homotherium was a genus of large-bodied scimitar-toothed cats, morphologically distinct from any extant felid species, that went extinct at the end of the Pleistocene [1-4]. They possessed large, saber-form serrated canine teeth, powerful forelimbs, a sloping back, and an enlarged optic bulb, all of which were key characteristics for predation on Pleistocene megafauna [5]. Previous mitochondrial DNA phylogenies suggested that it was a highly divergent sister lineage to all extant cat species [6-8]. However, mitochondrial phylogenies can be misled by hybridization [9], incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), or sex-biased dispersal patterns [10], which might be especially relevant for Homotherium since widespread mito-nuclear discrepancies have been uncovered in modern cats [10]. To examine the evolutionary history of Homotherium, we generated a -7x nuclear genome and a similar to 38x exome from H. latidens using shotgun and target-capture sequencing approaches. Phylogenetic analyses reveal Homotherium as highly divergent (similar to 22.5 Ma) from living cat species, with no detectable signs of gene flow. Comparative genomic analyses found signatures of positive selection in several genes, including those involved in vision, cognitive function, and energy consumption, putatively consistent with diurnal activity, well-developed social behavior, and cursorial hunting [5]. Finally, we uncover relatively high levels of genetic diversity, suggesting that Homotherium may have been more abundant than the limited fossil record suggests [3, 4, 11-14]. Our findings complement and extend previous inferences from both the fossil record and initial molecular studies, enhancing our understanding of the evolution and ecology of this remarkable lineage.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{PaijmansBarnettGilbertetal.2017,
  author    = {Paijmans, Johanna L. A. and Barnett, Ross and Gilbert, M. Thomas P. and Zepeda-Mendoza, M. Lisandra and Reumer, Jelle W. F. and de Vos, John and Zazula, Grant and Nagel, Doris and Baryshnikov, Gennady F. and Leonard, Jennifer A. and Rohland, Nadin and Westbury, Michael V. and Barlow, Axel and Hofreiter, Michael},
  title     = {Evolutionary History of Saber-Toothed Cats Based on Ancient Mitogenomics},
  series = {Current biology},
  volume    = {27},
  journal   = {Current biology},
  publisher = {Cell Press},
  address   = {Cambridge},
  issn      = {0960-9822},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.033},
  pages     = {3330 -- +},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Saber-toothed cats (Machairodontinae) are among the most widely recognized representatives of the now largely extinct Pleistocene megafauna. However, many aspects of their ecology, evolution, and extinction remain uncertain. Although ancient-DNA studies have led to huge advances in our knowledge of these aspects of many other megafauna species (e.g., mammoths and cave bears), relatively few ancient-DNA studies have focused on saber-toothed cats [1-3], and they have been restricted to short fragments of mitochondrial DNA. Here we investigate the evolutionary history of two lineages of saber-toothed cats (Smilodon and Homotherium) in relation to living carnivores and find that the Machairodontinae form a well-supported clade that is distinct from all living felids. We present partial mitochondrial genomes from one S. populator sample and three Homotherium sp. samples, including the only Late Pleistocene Homotherium sample from Eurasia [4]. We confirm the identification of the unique Late Pleistocene European fossil through ancient-DNA analyses, thus strengthening the evidence that Homotherium occurred in Europe over 200,000 years later than previously believed. This in turn forces a re-evaluation of its demography and extinction dynamics. Within the Machairodontinae, we find a deep divergence between Smilodon and Homotherium (similar to 18 million years) but limited diversity between the American and European Homotherium specimens. The genetic data support the hypothesis that all Late Pleistocene (or post-Villafrancian) Homotherium should be considered a single species, H. latidens, which was previously proposed based on morphological data [5, 6].},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ThomasCarvalhoHaileetal.2019,
  author    = {Thomas, Jessica E. and Carvalho, Gary R. and Haile, James and Rawlence, Nicolas J. and Martin, Michael D. and Ho, Simon Y. W. and Sigfusson, Arnor P. and Josefsson, Vigfus A. and Frederiksen, Morten and Linnebjerg, Jannie F. and Castruita, Jose A. Samaniego and Niemann, Jonas and Sinding, Mikkel-Holger S. and Sandoval-Velasco, Marcela and Soares, Andre E. R. and Lacy, Robert and Barilaro, Christina and Best, Juila and Brandis, Dirk and Cavallo, Chiara and Elorza, Mikelo and Garrett, Kimball L. and Groot, Maaike and Johansson, Friederike and Lifjeld, Jan T. and Nilson, Goran and Serjeanston, Dale and Sweet, Paul and Fuller, Errol and Hufthammer, Anne Karin and Meldgaard, Morten and Fjeldsa, Jon and Shapiro, Beth and Hofreiter, Michael and Stewart, John R. and Gilbert, M. Thomas P. and Knapp, Michael},
  title     = {Demographic reconstruction from ancient DNA supports rapid extinction of the great auk},
  series = {eLife},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {eLife},
  publisher = {eLife Sciences Publications},
  address   = {Cambridge},
  issn      = {2050-084X},
  doi       = {10.7554/eLife.47509},
  pages     = {35},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {The great auk was once abundant and distributed across the North Atlantic. It is now extinct, having been heavily exploited for its eggs, meat, and feathers. We investigated the impact of human hunting on its demise by integrating genetic data, GPS-based ocean current data, and analyses of population viability. We sequenced complete mitochondrial genomes of 41 individuals from across the species' geographic range and reconstructed population structure and population dynamics throughout the Holocene. Taken together, our data do not provide any evidence that great auks were at risk of extinction prior to the onset of intensive human hunting in the early 16th century. In addition, our population viability analyses reveal that even if the great auk had not been under threat by environmental change, human hunting alone could have been sufficient to cause its extinction. Our results emphasise the vulnerability of even abundant and widespread species to intense and localised exploitation.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ThomasCarvalhoHaileetal.2017,
  author    = {Thomas, Jessica E. and Carvalho, Gary R. and Haile, James and Martin, Michael D. and Castruita, Jose A. Samaniego and Niemann, Jonas and Sinding, Mikkel-Holger S. and Sandoval-Velasco, Marcela and Rawlence, Nicolas J. and Fuller, Errol and Fjeldsa, Jon and Hofreiter, Michael and Stewart, John R. and Gilbert, M. Thomas P. and Knapp, Michael},
  title     = {An ‛Aukward' tale},
  series = {Genes},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Genes},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {MDPI},
  address   = {Basel},
  issn      = {2073-4425},
  doi       = {10.3390/genes8060164},
  pages     = {164},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {One hundred and seventy-three years ago, the last two Great Auks, Pinguinus impennis, ever reliably seen were killed. Their internal organs can be found in the collections of the Natural History Museum of Denmark, but the location of their skins has remained a mystery. In 1999, Great Auk expert Errol Fuller proposed a list of five potential candidate skins in museums around the world. Here we take a palaeogenomic approach to test which—if any—of Fuller's candidate skins likely belong to either of the two birds. Using mitochondrial genomes from the five candidate birds (housed in museums in Bremen, Brussels, Kiel, Los Angeles, and Oldenburg) and the organs of the last two known individuals, we partially solve the mystery that has been on Great Auk scholars' minds for generations and make new suggestions as to the whereabouts of the still-missing skin from these two birds.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SallehRamosMadrigalPenalozaetal.2017,
  author    = {Salleh, Faezah Mohd and Ramos-Madrigal, Jazmin and Penaloza, Fernando and Liu, Shanlin and Sinding, Mikkel-Holger S. and Patel, Riddhi P. and Martins, Renata and Lenz, Dorina and Fickel, J{\"o}rns and Roos, Christian and Shamsir, Mohd Shahir and Azman, Mohammad Shahfiz and Lim, Burton K. and Rossiter, Stephen J. and Wilting, Andreas and Gilbert, M. Thomas P.},
  title     = {An expanded mammal mitogenome dataset from Southeast Asia},
  series = {Gigascience},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {Gigascience},
  number    = {8},
  publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {2047-217X},
  pages     = {1 -- 19},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Background: Findings: Approximately 55 gigabases of raw sequence were generated. From this data we assembled 72 complete mitogenome sequences, with an average depth of coverage of 102.9x and 55.2x for modern samples and historical samples, respectively. This dataset represents 52 species, of which 30 species had no previous mitogenome data available. The mitogenomes were geotagged to their sampling location, where known, to display a detailed geographical distribution of the species. Conclusion:},
  language  = {en}
}